The U.S ranking slips considerably due to cost and access, not the quality of the care received.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0934556.html
USA: $6096 per capita
Canada: $3173 per capita.
Personally, I'd prefer a two tiered system. A base Health Care coverage for everyone, regardless of income, no refusal, but that can be supplemented by additional insurance. private rooms, less waiting times, access to perhaps experimental drugs. That sort of thing. A blending of the Canadian and US systems .. might work well.
Just curious, but are those not important issues? If it was efficient shouldn't it provide the best care possible for the lowest price possible? The US system seems horribly inefficient to me.
Tell that to Albertans who lived during the NEP.As a Canadian I'm more interested in US politics than my own because the ups and downs of the US economy have a greater affect on my wallet than anything my government does.
[qimg]http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Phantoms-500x387.jpg[/qimg]
Timely post here.
Tell that to Albertans who lived during the NEP.
I don't get the OP's rage. His cadre is ruling the roost up here these days. Taxes are down. Military spending is up. Civil servants are demonized. Science is second fiddle to ideology. Shouldn't he be reveling in righty righteousness?
Absolutely, but why are costs so high?
Malpractice and insurance?
If an illegal immigrant is denied care does that equate to poor access?
Just some things to think about, wish I had all the answers.
It was probably all of your angry posts.Rage? What would make you think I was angry?
Now back to the OP, it seems the Democratic Socialists of America were part of the march and they have clear links to the Democratic party which can be found here:
http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Democratic_Socialists_of_America
Also it's evident that the groups organizing and promoting this event (link provided in a previous post) are democratic supporters and voters for the most part.
From my understanding it's mostly the insurance companies.
And, personally, I think it's in our best interest to treat anyone, even illegal aliens. Concepts like herd immunity come to mind.
It was probably all of your angry posts.
If an illegal immigrant is denied care does that equate to poor access?
Why did you post a link to a New Zealand website? Couldn't find anyone else to support your delusions?
It's probably because of the angry language you use.You can infer I'm angry from posts written in this thread?
Damn Snowbacks. We should turn 'em back at the border.

It's probably because of the angry language you use.
Actually, I think the problem is really more along the lines of a snotty Canadian trolling Americans about America.Maybe I should use more smileys like BAC. Then again some people have a problem with that too.![]()
Treating non-payers might have bad consequences and may be one of the reasons costs are so high. Cutting off your nose to spite your face, comes to mind. Saying that, I couldn't imagine turning away a sick person.
Actually, I think the problem is really more along the lines of a snotty Canadian trolling Americans about America.
Didn't you get the memo? We're polite.
Thank you.
(Reading more of Rep. Bobby's bills).
The southern USA is made of crazy. How do people like this get elected?