• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Continuation - Discussion of the Amanda Knox case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alt+F4 said:
Well he might have gotten the towels after he stabbed her. The point is that if he went to the bathroom to get the towels he would have left bloody shoe prints leading to the bathroom. There were none.

He also would have left bloody shoe prints when he went in went into the bathroom to wash up. There were none.
Click to expand...

I believe the shoe prints at the end of the bad as well as the knife print are indicative of him taking his shoes off before he went to the bathroom.
 
Jungle Jim said:
Regarding the diaries of Rudy, Amanda and Raffaele...Do prison cells in Italy come furnished with paper and pen, or does one have to request same?
Click to expand...

IIRC, the police gave Amanda a pen and paper and said words to the effect, "You are a writer, you should write." It was still naive of her and Raffaele. However, if one reads Raffaele's diary as a whole, one gets a vastly different impression than one might get by only reading and quoting a few sentences about the knife.
 
RoseMontague said:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20000577-504083.html
Click to expand...

No he didn't :)

That's a load of complete rubbish made up by FOA Paul Ciolino. I notice Paul neglects to mention he was also working for the FOA as part as their campaign. That's despicable journalistic ethics.

Where's the quote from Giobbi? If he said it, why aren't they quoting his words?

I don't believe a damn thing 48 hours says about this case. All they have done is tell lie after lie after lie. It's interesting how many people seem to get suckered though.

So, unless you have a better source then Paul Ciolino and 48 hours and an actual quote from Giobbi, forget it.
 
Katody Matrass said:
What about that Spezi's doorstop, that to Mignini was a satanic artefact of dark magic? I vaguely remember there were also nutjob theories of swapped bodies and vast satanic conspiracy which lead Mignini to accuse like 20 people, that were later freed. Lunacy, isn't it :)?

And yes, we don't care what Nadeau says ;)
Click to expand...
Do you always dismiss opinions that differ from your own in this manner?
 
RoseMontague said:
I believe the shoe prints at the end of the bad as well as the knife print are indicative of him taking his shoes off before he went to the bathroom.
Click to expand...

You could be right, but then there should be his bloody foot prints leading from the bedroom to the bathroom. It's my understanding that the only bloody foot prints found were Rudy's from the bedroom leading out the front door.
 
Katody Matrass said:
Well, you're wrong. The evidence was discredited and the verdict was discredited. That you can only defend the evidence by circular reasoning of constant and repetitious appeal to the "authority" of the discredited verdict is telling.
Click to expand...
How do you arrive at the conclusion that the evidence was discredited?
 
Michael said:
I see, so now he was holding a knife, a towel, both Meredith's arms and sexually assaulting her all at the same time. The man's an octopus!
Click to expand...
RoseMontague said:
My opinion is at the time she was sexually assaulted she was in no condition to resist.
Click to expand...

Thank's for the swift mole-whacking :)

I can't believe Fulcanelli so shamelessly pops up a mole of that particularly ridiculous talking point. We discussed it thoroughly before his last suspension and he completely couldn't substantiate that claim.
 
moodstream said:
At that time, the police fully expected to find evidence of Knox, Sollecito, and Lumumba inside of Meredth's room. There was plenty of evidence in that room, but none of it, not one bit of it, was pointing in their direction. No evidence at all. In fact, it was all pointing towards a completely different person! Moreover, Lumumba was providing a first class alibi and would soon have to be released.

As for the quotes from Sollecito and Knox, were they made to the police or before the court? Because otherwise you seem to be stripping them of their right to speak and write privately as they please.

It seems to me that the problem for both of them is that they trusted the authorities too much. They trusted that if they were told a knife existed that had DNA evidence of both Meredith and Knox on it, they believed it. Being innocent, the question for them to explain was how could that be? Sollecito offered he thought maybe Meredith had cooked with it at his house.
Click to expand...


We can't really accuse them of bias then, can we?

Although, you are forgetting the bra clasp.
 
Katody Matrass said:
What about that Spezi's doorstop, that to Mignini was a satanic artefact of dark magic? I vaguely remember there were also nutjob theories of swapped bodies and vast satanic conspiracy which lead Mignini to accuse like 20 people, that were later freed. Lunacy, isn't it :)?

And yes, we don't care what Nadeau says ;)
Click to expand...

Since this claim was made by Spezi and Preston, I don't put much stock in it.
 
halides1 said:
IIRC, the police gave Amanda a pen and paper and said words to the effect, "You are a writer, you should write." It was still naive of her and Raffaele. However, if one reads Raffaele's diary as a whole, one gets a vastly different impression than one might get by only reading and quoting a few sentences about the knife.
Click to expand...
How do you know the police said "You are a writer, you should write?"
Your imnagination perhaps?
 
Fulcanelli said:
No he didn't :)

That's a load of complete rubbish made up by FOA Paul Ciolino. I notice Paul neglects to mention he was also working for the FOA as part as their campaign. That's despicable journalistic ethics.

Where's the quote from Giobbi? If he said it, why aren't they quoting his words?

I don't believe a damn thing 48 hours says about this case. All they have done is tell lie after lie after lie. It's interesting how many people seem to get suckered though.

So, unless you have a better source then Paul Ciolino and 48 hours and an actual quote from Giobbi, forget it.
Click to expand...

It seems you don't take anyone as a source if it is a source that favors innocence. That is too bad. I believe it and I won't forget it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom