Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

[Belz...]

Forget my idea about that. I hadn't thought it through. A better version is that

A better version is that you didn't read what I said about this "better version" of yours. You consistently skip other people's posts. No wonder you keep digging that hole.

Your new version is idiotic because the passengers would STILL know they were on that flight. Some of them would be bound to remember the original number.

Anders, seriously, you need to stop and consider what you're doing: you are doing everything in your power to alter your version of events to suit your conclusion; when indeed it's the conclusion you should be worried about. That's what scientists would do, and that's NOT what you're doing.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Maybe they didn't. Maybe they only carried out the attack on the WTC. And as for the towers, I have presented a hypothesis that they were built to collapse like they did. I'm too lazy to find where I have posted about that, but it's on this forum.

I have an idea: How about we all decide we're too lazy to feed the ego of this puppy anymore?

I'll start: Anders, welcome to my ignore list.

Hans

 

[Belz...]

But are you sure the people who knew the victims are not actors?

Are you sure reality even exists ?

We can play this game all year with all sorts of topics, Anders. The fact of the matter is, at the end of the day it's just mental masturbation.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Maybe they didn't. Maybe they only carried out the attack on the WTC.

And, just coincidentally, somebody else happened to attack the Pentagon and crash a plane in Shanksville on the same morning?

And as for the towers, I have presented a hypothesis that they were built to collapse like they did. I'm too lazy to find where I have posted about that, but it's on this forum.

So now the coverup involved the designers of the Twin Towers and goes back to the 1960's. Right.

Look, I'm sorry to be yet another person breaking this to you, but do you realise you're probably insane?

Dave

 

[twinstead]

If crazy people knew they were insane, they wouldn't be insane.

 

[uke2se]

No, it's simple. Remember that my hypothesis is that the shadowy power group is separate from all the people who were forced to do the cover-up after the attack. The shadowy power group only needed to stage the initial fake planes inserted into the live video feeds that were sent to the large television networks plus a few staged amateur videos. Plus maybe some planted parts from airplanes such as the landing gear found. That's all they needed to do! Very few people needed for that.

Then why did you claim the conspiracy was vast with thousands and thousands of people only a page or two back? As I said, you're all over the place, grasping on to whatever to hold on to your delusion.

Now, could you please answer if you think your version of events is equally or more credible to the official version?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Then why did you claim the conspiracy was vast with thousands and thousands of people only a page or two back? As I said, you're all over the place, grasping on to whatever to hold on to your delusion.

Now, could you please answer if you think your version of events is equally or more credible to the official version?

My hypothesis involves two separate phases: I) The 9/11 attack and II) The cover-up. In my scenario, these are two separate things. See this post for a somewhat more detailed description: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6386210&postcount=1219

 

[uke2se]

My hypothesis involves two separate phases: I) The 9/11 attack and II) The cover-up. In my scenario, these are two separate things. See this post for a somewhat more detailed description: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6386210&postcount=1219

That didn't answer either of my questions.

1. If you are now claiming a small conspiracy, why did you claim a large one one or two pages ago in this thread?

2. Could you please answer my repeatedly posed question about whether you find your version of events more credible than the official one?

I will keep repeating these questions until you either answer them or until you admit that you're talking out of your derrière.

 

[Belz...]

But surely some truthers are experts, or?

No. If they were experts they wouldn't be truthers because experts know what they're talking about, and truthers don't.

 

[Belz...]

Then why do I believe it really was a separate shadow power group that carried out the 9/11 attack as a false flag operation? Because it would have been incredibly stupid of the U.S. government to put themselves in a situation where they were forced to do an enormously messy and large cover-up after the attack.

So your conspiracy theory exists only to cover up your other conspiracy theory ? Again: does that sound reasonable to you ?

 

[Dave Rogers]

But surely some truthers are experts, or?

Funnily enough, truthers seem to try very hard to avoid the parts of the conspiracy theories that overlap with their areas of expertise, in the rare instance that they have one.

Dave

 

[Anders Lindman]

That didn't answer either of my questions.

1. If you are now claiming a small conspiracy, why did you claim a large one one or two pages ago in this thread?

2. Could you please answer my repeatedly posed question about whether you find your version of events more credible than the official one?

I will keep repeating these questions until you either answer them or until you admit that you're talking out of your derrière.

Well, I guess you could call the cover-up a conspiracy. But the cover-up is miles apart from the actual 9/11 attack. Please don't look at the cover-up as your ordinary conspiracy, because it isn't. It's the initial false flag attack that is the conspiracy at hand, unless, of course, you are so gullible as to believe in the official story. Have I made myself clear?

 

[Disbelief]

I am having trouble determining if this thread is realistice or not.

 

[uke2se]

Well, I guess you could call the cover-up a conspiracy. But the cover-up is miles apart from the actual 9/11 attack. Please don't look at the cover-up as your ordinary conspiracy, because it isn't. It's the initial false flag attack that is the conspiracy at hand, unless, of course, you are so gullible as to believe in the official story. Have I made myself clear?

Ok, that's one question answered. There was a huge conspiracy and a small conspiracy. Congratulations, you just managed to complicate your version even more.

Now, how about you answer the second question? Without insults, please.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So your conspiracy theory exists only to cover up your other conspiracy theory ? Again: does that sound reasonable to you ?

Let me clarify: The 9/11 attack was a conspiracy. The cover-up is not.

 

[uke2se]

Let me clarify: The 9/11 attack was a conspiracy. The cover-up is not.

So where is the vast conspiracy you talked about a couple of pages back?

I don't think you could be back peddling any harder if you tried.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Ok, that's one question answered. There was a huge conspiracy and a small conspiracy. Congratulations, you just managed to complicate your version even more.

Now, how about you answer the second question? Without insults, please.

Is the conspiracy scenario I have presented more plausible than the official story? In the light of the fairy tale concoctions presented by the official sources, yes I believe it is.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So where is the vast conspiracy you talked about a couple of pages back?

I don't think you could be back peddling any harder if you tried.

Can you please point me to this vast conspiracy you claim I have described? Either my memory fails me, or I have never made such a claim.

 

[uke2se]

Is the conspiracy scenario I have presented more plausible than the official story? In the light of the fairy tale concoctions presented by the official sources, yes I believe it is.

Ok, just to recap:

You think

- that planes were edited in during live broadcast, that thousands, if not a million or more people who saw the attacks unfold before their very eyes in NYC didn't actually see any planes and lied about it/were peer-pressured into believing it, that the friends and families of victims aboard the hijacked planes are lying/were lied to about their loved ones who actually live in incognito having pinky-sworn never to speak to anyone in their former lives "until the situation is cleared up", including several young children -

is more likely than the official version which is supported by scientists, witnesses and family members of the victims.

Good grief!

 

[uke2se]

I admit that it would require a HUGE cover-up, involving thousands and thousands of people. Yet, that's what I believe was done, and is still being done.

Here's where you claim a vast conspiracy, Anders. Just because it drops off the last page in the thread doesn't mean it disappears.