... says the guy whose scientific lexicon includes the term "a ton of bricks!"
Says the poor, deluded commentbot who argued that an impact from a "ton of bricks" wouldn't hurt a bit, because it's just a loose pile of rubble without any structural integrity...
So you're not interested in trying your hand at what is arguably a fundamental engineering tool in order to further your understanding of both engineering physics and a particular situation?Sorry, but your "thinking" I "should draw one" doesn't really inspire me to do so.
I have drawn one - several thousands, actually.If you like them so much, perhaps you should draw one. Yes?
This is incorrect - it is you who seem to have trouble understanding the physics at play in our particular situation. I think you should draw a free body diagram so that you might see more clearly what happened during the collapse.And you still haven't told me what explanation of mine you're having trouble understanding.
Don't forget that this attention-seeker also asserted that a pile of rubble the size of the Earth's moon might not crush a high rise. .
So you're not interested in trying your hand at what is arguably a fundamental engineering tool in order to further your understanding of both engineering physics and a particular situation?
I have drawn one - several thousands, actually.
This is incorrect - it is you who seem to have trouble understanding the physics at play in our particular situation. I think you should draw a free body diagram so that you might see more clearly what happened during the collapse.
I'm sorry also, but for a different reason.No, because I understand the concept. I'm sorry you don't.
I'm an engineer - I'm not happy unless I'm angry.That must make you really happy!![]()
Maybe, but just think - you could use a free body diagram to prove us wrong! Think of how cool that would be.Perhaps because you folks haven't explained it very well. Or you haven't actually used any recognized principles of physics. Just a guess.
Hmm, but if I'm not familiar with drawing free body diagrams, how would that help me?
It's obvious to me you're just dying to do a free body diagram of Newton's Third Law, in order to educate me. Please, please, have at it. I would be very happy to look at it.
You're welcome. Let me know how it goes if you take a stab at it. I'm sorry I don't have any resources for you, but all of mine are hard copies. A lot of us learned on Meriam and Kraige, but I'm sure there are other, equally valuable, books available.I'll think about it. Thanks for the suggestion.
No thanks. The guys at work think I'm weird enough already.Would you like any more poetry tools?
AZ. please leave the bad troll alone. let him sulk under his dark bridge. best not to tempt the troll unless you have the three billy goats gruff with you.
I'd settle for a limerick. A limerick outlining the Bazant crush-down, crush-up hypothesis. I would even offer a reward for the best one. $10 Canadian.
There once were two towers too tall
For their good, so they started to fall
...
It would be nice to make one as tight as this one about 9/11.Ooo, that's pretty good, Bill. It's /even got a bit of haiku feeling to it.
Why would I make a "free body diagram"? Was I claiming to be an expert at technical drawings? If so, please link to the post where I make this claim. Thanks.
Hmm, but if I'm not familiar with drawing free body diagrams, how would that help me?
It's obvious to me you're just dying to do a free body diagram of Newton's Third Law, in order to educate me. Please, please, have at it. I would be very happy to look at it.