Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
Well if you ask DC he will certainly tell you that there is a first time for everything.

[some moving goal posts snipped]
Click to expand...

That was not my question.
Just wanted to know how you know what a nano-thermite-induced building collapse looks and sounds like. It's just in your imagination, right?

Do you beliebe that nano-thermite is an explosive, as some truthers believe, or do you think is is an incendiary, as others seem to imply?

Oh, and while we're at it. Wouldn't a building that had many of its columns an joints made to disappear by fairy dust look and sound the same, too? :D
 
bill smith said:
Well if you ask DC he will certainly tell you that there is a first time for everything.

But apart from that we have the two-year study by the team of 8 scientists (some of them Ph.d's ) that have proven in their seminal peer-reviewed paper that nanothermite was used copiously at the WTC. They actually have unexploded remnant fragments that they can ignite to this day.

We also know through Kevin Bacon's work that NIST was deeply involved in the developement of nanothermite as was the military..

I have the videos to a lot of this stuff if you want me to post them..
Click to expand...

for everything?

make sure to make a thread once it is peer reviewed, i will surely read it.
 
Oystein said:
That was not my question.
Just wanted to know how you know what a nano-thermite-induced building collapse looks and sounds like. It's just in your imagination, right?

Do you beliebe that nano-thermite is an explosive, as some truthers believe, or do you think is is an incendiary, as others seem to imply?

Oh, and while we're at it. Wouldn't a building that had many of its columns an joints made to disappear by fairy dust look and sound the same, too? :D
Click to expand...

Nanothermite is extremely versatile. It can be manufactured at various particle sizes for different effects. In one iteration it is exclusively a non-gas producing incendiary and in another and with the addition of some hi-tech gas-producing polymers can be made into a high-explosive.

If nanothermite incendiary was used in WTC7 it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive controlled demolition that we all know and love, But it would look pretty much exactly the same. Just no explosions.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Nanothermite is extremely versatile. It can be manufactured at various particle sizes for different effects. In one iteration it is exclusively a non-gas producing incendiary and in another and with the addition of some hi-tech gas-producing polymers can be made into a high-explosive.

If nanothermite incendiary was used in WTC7 it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive controlled demolition that we all know and love, But it would look pretty much exactly the same. Just no explosions.
Click to expand...

Wrong again Bill. All forms of thermite are self-oxidizing. And there is not source besides you kooks who say its explosive or can demonstrate that fact. And you have no idea what it wold look or sound like. No one has ever done it. Your imagination does not constitute fact.
 
grandmastershek said:
Wrong again Bill. All forms of thermite are self-oxidizing. And there is not source besides you kooks who say its explosive or can demonstrate that fact. And you have no idea what it wold look or sound like. No one has ever done it. Your imagination does not constitute fact.
Click to expand...

It's cool, gms,

Bill has pretty much explained to us that, if nanothermite was used, it can't have been the explosive kind (if that existed at all). Only the incendiary kind needs to be considered. ETA: We should recruit Bill's help the next time someone makes a claim about explosives.
 
bill smith said:
Nanothermite is extremely versatile. It can be manufactured at various particle sizes for different effects. In one iteration it is exclusively a non-gas producing incendiary and in another and with the addition of some hi-tech gas-producing polymers can be made into a high-explosive.

If nanothermite incendiary was used in WTC7 it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive controlled demolition that we all know and love, But it would look pretty much exactly the same. Just no explosions.
Click to expand...
Did you pull this all out of your arse, or can you back this up?

I'm particularly interested in the part about "it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive".
 
Oystein said:
That was not my question.
Just wanted to know how you know what a nano-thermite-induced building collapse looks and sounds like. It's just in your imagination, right?

Do you beliebe that nano-thermite is an explosive, as some truthers believe, or do you think is is an incendiary, as others seem to imply?

Oh, and while we're at it. Wouldn't a building that had many of its columns an joints made to disappear by fairy dust look and sound the same, too? :D
Click to expand...

Nanothermite is extremely versatile. It can be manufactured at various particle sizes for different effects. In one iteration it is exclusively a non-gas producing incendiary and in another and with the addition of some hi-tech gas-producing polymers can be made into a high-explosive.

If nanothermite incendiary was used in WTC7 it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive controlled demolition that we all know and love, But it would look pretty much exactly the same. Just no explosions.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Did you pull this all out of your arse, or can you back this up?

I'm particularly interested in the part about "it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive".
Click to expand...

Nanothermite incendiary just goes 'ssssssssssss' Normal explosive like C-4 or RDX go 'BANG'.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Nanothermite is extremely versatile. It can be manufactured at various particle sizes for different effects. In one iteration it is exclusively a non-gas producing incendiary and in another and with the addition of some hi-tech gas-producing polymers can be made into a high-explosive.

If nanothermite incendiary was used in WTC7 it would not sound at all like the conventional explosive controlled demolition that we all know and love, But it would look pretty much exactly the same. Just no explosions.
Click to expand...

Awesome...what example are you basing this off of?
 
Fourbrick said:
Come on, Tam. You don't really think that the Wright Brothers were the first to fly a "man made construction" do you? There's even doubt that they were the first to fly a "powered heavier than air" machine.
Click to expand...

I haven't been shown any legitimate proof to the contrary. We are talking sustained flight...lots of people jumped off bridges, for those few moments, they took flight. Put them in a box while they do it, and call the box a plane.

TAM;)
 
bill smith said:
I think so yes. When Shyam Sunder made such a positive statement about there being no explosive sound at WTC7 I guess that he was satisfied that he could prove it. He didn't have to go out on a limb about it but he did..

For instance he had to know about the firefighters-at-the-phone video Therefore that is probably a plant that he knew he could easily discredit or explain.
Click to expand...

God bill, you make my day filled with laughter sometimes.

...meanwhile, back here on planet earth...

TAM:D
 
Well those two things (hunger and making mistakes) may be the only two things we have in common bill.

TAM:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom