Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
I wonder if some of the usual suspects like Oystein, Grizzly. Sarge etc would like to make statements that they also believe that WTC7 looked like a Controlled Demolition at this point ? You should call on them too TAM. Call it an honesty check..

All debunkers welcome..
Click to expand...

Oh, no problem.
Yes, superficially, and with the sound off, and being a non-expert, WTC7 looks like a CD.

The sun looks like a yello disk in the sky, and looks like it flies around the earth. it isn't and it doesn't.
You look like a hot young lady in sexy high heels. You aren't.
A destroying angel looks like a white mushroom. It isn't (hopefully).
My brother-in-law looks like Tom Hanks. He isn't.


There is a good reason why WTC7 looks like a CD:
- WTC7 is, to 95% or so, a gravitational collapse
- A CD is, to 95% or so, a gravitational collapse

So, really, WTC7 looks like a gravitional collapse, because it is.
And a CD looks like a gravitional collapse, because it is.






Question back at you, to check your honesty:

Would you like to make a statement that you know that things aren't always what they look like?
Would you also like to make a statement that you think WTC7 is largely a gravitational collapse, as is a CD?
 
Oystein said:
Oh, no problem.
Yes, superficially, and with the sound off, and being a non-expert, WTC7 looks like a CD.

The sun looks like a yello disk in the sky, and looks like it flies around the earth. it isn't and it doesn't.
You look like a hot young lady in sexy high heels. You aren't.
A destroying angel looks like a white mushroom. It isn't (hopefully).
My brother-in-law looks like Tom Hanks. He isn't.


There is a good reason why WTC7 looks like a CD:
- WTC7 is, to 95% or so, a gravitational collapse
- A CD is, to 95% or so, a gravitational collapse

So, really, WTC7 looks like a gravitional collapse, because it is.
And a CD looks like a gravitional collapse, because it is.






Question back at you, to check your honesty:

Would you like to make a statement that you know that things aren't always what they look like?
Would you also like to make a statement that you think WTC7 is largely a gravitational collapse, as is a CD?
Click to expand...

Yes..I think we can add that one to the list..

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oystein wrote 07.09.2010

''Yes, superficially, and with the sound off, and being a non-expert, WTC7 looks like a CD.''

NOTE: The only look anybody got of the collapse of WTC7 was superficial. There was no explosive sound in any video of WTC7. We are almost all non-experts.

Therefore, with those points eliminated, Oystein, just as the others believes that WTC7 looked like a controlled demolition.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6306839&postcount=59 Hyperlink

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
I love it when people link to wikipedia articles that are covered in "needs verification" labels, and "This is contraversial" within the first few lines...well done.

TAM
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Come on, Tam. You don't really think that the Wright Brothers were the first to fly a "man made construction" do you? There's even doubt that they were the first to fly a "powered heavier than air" machine.
 
Oystein said:
Question back at you, to check your honesty:

Would you like to make a statement that you know that things aren't always what they look like?
Would you also like to make a statement that you think WTC7 is largely a gravitational collapse, as is a CD?
Click to expand...

In the sense that when joints and support columns are melted or explosively removed then the building will go into a collapse that is gravity driven from that point on.
 
bill smith said:
Yes..I think we can add that one to the list..

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oystein wrote 07.09.2010

''Yes, superficially, and with the sound off, and being a non-expert, WTC7 looks like a CD.''

NOTE: The only look anybody got of the collapse of WTC7 was superficial. There was no sound in any video. We are almost all non-experts.

Therefore, with those points eliminated, Oystein, just as the others believes that WTC7 looked like a controlled demolition.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6306839&postcount=59 Hyperlink

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...

what do you mean with there was no sound?
 
Fourbrick said:
Come on, Tam. You don't really think that the Wright Brothers were the first to fly a "man made construction" do you? There's even doubt that they were the first to fly a "powered heavier than air" machine.
Click to expand...

they where the first to build an construction enabling enduring, steered and motorized flight.
 
Scott Jurgenson said:
Why do the Trolls turn every thread into a debate? This thread was asking for videos helping him find a video showing debris hitting wtc7, not "please debate wheither or not wtc7 was brought down by CD or not".

Ya'll come back now, ya'hrrr
Click to expand...

Oystein said:
It would really help if people stopped responding particularly to Bill Smith.
Click to expand...

Quoting for truth.
 
bill smith said:
...
NOTE: The only look anybody got of the collapse of WTC7 was superficial. There was no explosive sound in any video of WTC7. We are almost all non-experts.
...
Click to expand...

Ok. Would you be ready to make a statement that the collapse of WTC did not sound like a Controlled Demolition?
 
DC said:
So you agree on that there was no Explosive sound? you are into Thermite then?
Click to expand...

I think so yes. When Shyam Sunder made such a positive statement about there being no explosive sound at WTC7 I guess that he was satisfied that he could prove it. He didn't have to go out on a limb about it but he did..

For instance he had to know about the firefighters-at-the-phone video Therefore that is probably a plant that he knew he could easily discredit or explain.
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
Ok. Would you be ready to make a statement that the collapse of WTC did not sound like a Controlled Demolition?
Click to expand...

Sure...WTC7 did not sound like an explosive controlled demolition no. It resembled much more a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite.
 
Last edited:
But never before in recorded history was nanothermite causing a collapse
 
Fourbrick said:
Come on, Tam. You don't really think that the Wright Brothers were the first to fly a "man made construction" do you? There's even doubt that they were the first to fly a "powered heavier than air" machine.
Click to expand...

Does it really matter who had the first heavier than air powered flight? There really was a first time in history that it happened, no matter who accomplished it first.
 
Fourbrick said:
Even that's debatable, but re your first comment, still no cigar.
Click to expand...

ok it was a debatable claim. doesn't change the fact, that there was a time when never before anybody flew a construction he made, and then there was someone who did it the first time.
 
bill smith said:
Sure...WTC7 did not sound like an explosive controlled demolition no. It resembled much more a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite.
Click to expand...

How do you know?
Have you ever witnessed "a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite"?
Or have you ever seen a video of "a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite"?
Have you even ever heard of any "collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite" at all?

These are 3 questions. Would the answers be "no", "no", and "no"?
 
Oystein said:
How do you know?
Have you ever witnessed "a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite"?
Or have you ever seen a video of "a collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite"?
Have you even ever heard of any "collapse in which critical parts of all the main columns and many many joints were melted by nanothermite" at all?

These are 3 questions. Would the answers be "no", "no", and "no"?
Click to expand...

Well if you ask DC he will certainly tell you that there is a first time for everything.

But apart from that we have the two-year study by the team of 8 scientists (some of them Ph.d's ) that have proven in their seminal peer-reviewed paper that nanothermite was used copiously at the WTC. They actually have unexploded remnant fragments that they can ignite to this day.

We also know through Kevin Bacon's work that NIST was deeply involved in the developement of nanothermite as was the military..

I have the videos to a lot of this stuff if you want me to post them..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom