In other words, we don't trust any first hand information we have but trust your opinion.
What do you mean by "first hand information"? Any eyewitness report is second hand information. First hand information would be a physical measurement or recording of the event as it takes place.
So yes, we as skeptics do not trust any information just because it is there. We always try to corroborate and assemble all of the information - first, second, third hand - into a theory. That is something that the Truth Movement has utterly failed to do to this day - there is no theory anywhere, much less one that a significant portion of the TM could agree upon.
We try to assess any information in terms of reliabilty and know for example that eyewitness testimony must always be scrutinizes, always always always, as it is very much subject to errors of perception, expectation, memorization, recollection, manipulation by interviewers and all the doortraps of language.
Well, and there is no proof of a fuel conflagration vs. any type of explosion that was capable to completely destruct 2+basement floors in a radius reaching down one more floor and caving in the subway path.
Wrong. It has been reported by local press, who generally tend to get this sort of information directly from local hospitals, that many people were treated who had wounds that are consistent with conflagration and fire, but none were treated for wounds that are typical of the kinds of shockwaves bombs produce. No hearing loss, for example, no shrapnell that penetrated deeply into bodies.
Strangely enough the effect to the lobby was completely off center regarding the express shafts but destructed banks of local elevators with blown out doors and twisted cabins in the shaft.
I must admit I have difficultie assessing this narrative.
I thought it is consensus that the towers fell due to extreme loading conditions? How do you get it?
It is - extreme loading conditions brought about by fires and plane crashed high up in the towers, not loading conditions brought about by anything that happened in the basement. That's why bombs in the basement would have been redundant.
Hmm, the alleged floor 22 "fuel conflagration" was indeed the major obstacle to fire fighting or rescue activities. No one could enter the MER floors. No one could open the roof access. The fire fighters had no proper communication system anymore. ...destroyed by some intelligent fuel that decided to reach the proper conditions at 22 not 23 or 21.
Would you say that it is consistent with an explosion or a fuel conflagration? Sorry for citing an "unreliable" witness once again but express shafts 6 and 7 had no doors or framing at that floor. And 50 had no cables anymore. Which elevators is the fire fighter talking about? The rest about the consequences of the destruction of the OCC at 22 can be found in the report. (NIST NCSTAR 1-7, Chapter 6)
Again, I cannot tell you all scenrios this observation would be consistent with. That is because a) I have no sound basis of expertise or science to base my opinion upon; just trying to imagine things doesn't cut it and b) I must take into consideration that whatever the firemen tell from recollection is not what really happened. Reasons see above.
