• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Care to Comment

Miragememories said:
You toss a vast net as to your qualifications.

Your clue judgement is only exceeded by your arrogance.

MM
Click to expand...
What was your take on the moronic video? Why did the idiot who made the video ignore gravity? How do your delusion on 911 dovetail with the idiotic video, or are you unable to comment on topic?


What do you think about the video's failed models?
 
MM,

R.Mackey said:
The presence of tilt will "smear" a jolt, possibly making it invisible. In the case of the WTC Towers we don't expect much of one.
Click to expand...

Miragememories said:
Since this is not your area of expertise, please explain, rather than state your opinion as if it were a fact.
Click to expand...

Miragememories said:
When someone (R. Mackey), is not professionally qualified to state categorically that another person's statement is in error, then they should produce documentation to support their argument.
Click to expand...


Exactly what qualifications do you believe are required to make the statement that Ryan made?

Which of those qualifications do you believe he lacks?

As demonstrated by the (probably apocryphal) story of the structural engineers stumped as to how to extract the semi truck wedged under the overpass, and a boy in the crowd providing the "why don't you let some air out of the tires" solution, sometimes self-contained logic trumps expertise.

What part of Ryan's assessment of "tilt will smear out jolts" do you find logically inconsistent?

tom
 
Last edited:
tfk said:
MM,....
Exactly what qualifications do you believe are required to make the statement that Ryan made?

Which of those qualifications do you believe he lacks?

As demonstrated by the (probably apocryphal) story of the structural engineers stumped as to how to extract the semi truck wedged under the overpass, and a boy in the crowd providing the "why don't you let some air out of the tires" solution, sometimes self-contained logic trumps expertise.

What part of Ryan's assessment of "tilt will smear out jolts" do you find logically inconsistent?

tom
Click to expand...
Despite all the snide commentary and personal insults from MM the true test of any claim is "is it right". If the claim is right it matters not what the qualifications of the person making the claim. And possession of multiple Doctorates will not rescue a claim which is wrong.
 
ozeco41 said:
Despite all the snide commentary and personal insults from MM the true test of any claim is "is it right". If the claim is right it matters not what the qualifications of the person making the claim. And possession of multiple Doctorates will not rescue a claim which is wrong.
Click to expand...

I frequently use Judy Wood (Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering) as an example of a person, possessing at least one relevant doctorate, who frequently makes claims that are quite obviously wrong.
 
ozeco41 said:
Despite all the snide commentary and personal insults from MM the true test of any claim is "is it right". If the claim is right it matters not what the qualifications of the person making the claim. And possession of multiple Doctorates will not rescue a claim which is wrong.
Click to expand...


Correct or incorrect is obviously the ultimate goal.

But that was not the issue at hand.

The issue was "was Ryan's statement about 'tilt smearing out jolts' an amateur opinion or a (opposite of amateur) professional opinion?"

I asked MM what specific expertise he believes is required to tip that balance in this specific instance.
I asked him what logical inconsistencies he found in Ryan's analysis of the situation.

My questions to MM stand. I'd like an answer to them.
 
Last edited:
Answered what question?

Some idiot nattering about "credentials" again? That's an ad Hominem logical fallacy. It merits no attention.

But if you insist, you can find my CV online without much difficulty. Many have.
 
Patriots4Truth said:
If that is your typical response then I don't know why anyone would bother asking you anything
Click to expand...

The sheer irony of that statement gave me quite a giggle.

Sorry, I usually Ignore all Truthers categorically. Don't know how I missed you. Please see here for my policy statement, and the test that not a single one of you has ever been able to pass. Cheerio.
 
You never checked Enik's FEA.. possibly because you don't want to do your own FEA. So what's so great about your little contest?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom