leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 18,863
What is the safety flaw in oil rigs that was discovered? Knowingly using a damaged blow-out preventer? Not repairing possibly damaged casings?
Incorrect operator headspace.
What is the safety flaw in oil rigs that was discovered? Knowingly using a damaged blow-out preventer? Not repairing possibly damaged casings?
Incorrect operator headspace.
They can be if they rule in favor of an industry in which they have a financial stake. It's called "corruption."
Lots of that went on in regards to the courts under the misguidance of the previous POTUS.
Is lefty doing a Beck here?Let me know when you can prove this happened.
Let me know when you can prove this happened.
It's been proved at least as of an hour ago. He has stock in the company that built the rig that caused the spill. Paper records shown on air.Now for his, I hope, impeachment/de-barring!!!
Feldman said:If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are? Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? All trains? All mines? That sort of thinking seems heavyhanded, and rather overbearing.
If a new and not well-tested airplane goes down and something about the design of the plane is suspected as the cause of the crash, you're darn right we should ground other planes of that design until we at least know the cause of the crash.
It's been proved at least as of an hour ago. He has stock in the company that built the rig that caused the spill. Paper records shown on air.Now for his, I hope, impeachment/de-barring!!!
so why shut down all drilling if it was BPs lack of safety that led to the accident? why not shut down BP drillingJust checking - was it BP or Obama who violated several of their own safety regs - and - according to their own memos - underplaced safety devices that would likely have prevented any major spill and likely any spill at all. At least our loathing of bush and all his butt buddies had a basis in the real world.
how many of the 3567 remaining rigs are operated by BP? do we know they follow proper safety procedures?And again, the moratorium would only affect 33 out of 3600 oil and natural gas platforms in the Gulf. No way is this the major cause of economic hardship in the region. And BP should pay those affected by it anyway, since their disaster is what led to the moratorium.
but they didnt ground all arcraft, or even all propeller-driven aircraftDuring the operational phase of the Osprey program, they grounded all of them everytime one crashed.
so why shut down all drilling if it was BPs lack of safety that led to the accident? why not shut down BP drilling
so then would the lack of oversight not apply to all offshore drilling, not just deep water? would it apply to all oil drilling not just offshore? would it apply to all mining, not just oil?It wasn't just BP's lack of safety, but the MMS lack of oversight. Because of this, we have no idea if the other drilling operations are safe or not. It would be smart to stop all drilling operations until they can be inspected at this poing. This isn't the first time a moratorium has been issued due to an oil spill, just the first time the conservatives made a big stink about it.
so its just a feel good law with no real effect one way or the other. gotchaTargetting just the deep water rigs makes sense. It is the least adverse action for the industry over-all, because it involves the fewest rigs.
so its just a feel good law with no real effect one way or the other. gotcha
so its just a feel good law with no real effect one way or the other. gotcha
Because we don't know exactly what led to the accident, and we do know that the industry in general has done a poor job with contingency plans (relying instead on "fail safes" that we now know are not).so why shut down all drilling if it was BPs lack of safety that led to the accident? why not shut down BP drilling
The moratorium was only for those in deep water. A blow out in shallow water can be capped. Apparently there are no viable contingency plans for an accident like this in deep water. (Other than letting the oil spew while relief wells are drilled.)how many of the 3567 remaining rigs are operated by BP? do we know they follow proper safety procedures?
And the moratorium wasn't for all oil drilling in the Gulf. It was only for similar platforms (that is, in deep water). The judge is using a faulty analogy suggesting that the moratorium would be analogous to grounding all airplanes. It would be more like grounding all of that same aircraft if a design flaw were suspected--at least until the cause of the crash is determined.but they didnt ground all arcraft, or even all propeller-driven aircraft
Again, problems in shallow water wells can be dealt with. We have learned the hard way that there are no viable contingency plans for problems like this in deep water wells. We have learned that what works in shallow water doesn't work in deep water.so then would the lack of oversight not apply to all offshore drilling, not just deep water? would it apply to all oil drilling not just offshore? would it apply to all mining, not just oil?
And once the cause of the crash were determined NOT to be a design flaw (or in this case, once a viable contingency plan for deep water well problems is developed), the grounding would be lifted. Again, with new aircraft, this happens a lot. We want to err on the side of safety.to go back to the plane crash analogy, if it turns out the problem was a malfuntion in the individual aircraft, or a design flaw in that type of aircraft, but a problem with the FAA or ATC not doing their job, grounding just the one type of plane doesnt really help