Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

roscoe_the_first said:
The evidence is on the first post I made old chum. You knew that, stop deluding yourself.
Click to expand...

No, your first post contains links to YouTube videos. Tell me in which of those videos and on what timeframe the evidence is presented.

And I'm not talking about could have, would have, should have kind of evidence. I'm talking about the 1 (one) piece of evidence that undeniable proofs that 9/11 was an inside job.

But you don't have such evidence and you know that. Stop deluding yourself. And stop trolling.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
You were present at all four plane impacts then?
Click to expand...
No. And yet, I can still explain the events. Similarly, I was not present on D-Day, but I am familiar with many of the particulars of June 6, 1944 on the beaches of Normandy, France.

Is this some kind of solipsism?
 
carlitos said:
No. And yet, I can still explain the events. Similarly, I was not present on D-Day, but I am familiar with many of the particulars of June 6, 1944 on the beaches of Normandy, France.

Is this some kind of solipsism?
Click to expand...

what more so than EYEWITNESSESS?
 
Bell said:
No, your first post contains links to YouTube videos. Tell me in which of those videos and on what timeframe the evidence is presented.,
Click to expand...

All of them

Bell said:
And I'm not talking about could have, would have, should have kind of evidence. I'm talking about the 1 (one) piece of evidence that undeniable proofs that 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

Why don't you (wait for it........)

LOOK AT THE VIDEO.

Bell said:
But you don't have such evidence and you know that. Stop deluding yourself. And stop trolling.
Click to expand...

Hey you're right I don't. But the videos I posted do. I wasn't an eyewitness you see. But the people on those videos were.
 
roscoe the first, do you want to try this again? I think you missed the point.

roscoe_the_first said:
carlitos said:
No. And yet, I can still explain the events. Similarly, I was not present on D-Day, but I am familiar with many of the particulars of June 6, 1944 on the beaches of Normandy, France.

Is this some kind of solipsism?
Click to expand...

what more so than EYEWITNESSESS?
Click to expand...
??? Here is a link in case you missed it earlier - solipsismWP

Now, you are able to, but not willing, to discuss the contents of these earth-shattering videos? That's your story? You couldn't even paste words where I left the blank lines above? I remain unconvinced.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
LOOK AT THE VIDEO.
Click to expand...
Most of us have seen the flyover theory from CIT in some form or another. A case which is based on cherry picking 13 out of 100+ witnesses, and ignoring everything from the recovery of plane debris, damage to the building being consistent with a fast moving 100 ton mass slamming into it, DNA identification, flight data recorders, and radar data tracking the jet, along with the most obvious that the pane no longer exists in use, has already been discussed. People are a little tired of the repetition of quack theories, and you should consider moving onto a more productive phantom chase
 
CIT is just trying to get the hit rate up on their videos. Been up sine June 14, 2009 and part one has just over 4000 views and the last part has just under 800 views.

Compelling stuff there.

YAWNN!
 
Grizzly Bear said:
Most of us have seen the flyover theory from CIT in some form or another. A case which is based on cherry picking 13 out of 100+ witnesses, and ignoring everything from the recovery of plane debris, damage to the building being consistent with a fast moving 100 ton mass slamming into it, DNA identification, flight data recorders, and radar data tracking the jet, along with the most obvious that the pane no longer exists in use, has already been discussed. People are a little tired of the repetition of quack theories, and you should consider moving onto a more productive phantom chase
Click to expand...

And where has that all come from? These eyewitnesses on the other hand are independent and free to tell exactly as they saw it.
 
Which one? Don't believe you. Bluff called. Evidence please.
Click to expand...

A quick search found this, but there are some others.

BCR said:
By now, most people on this forum are familiar with this image from a CIT video.

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/Edwardpointsouth.gif[/qimg]

It has appeared on forum after forum, time and time again, as a ‘recreation’ of Edward Paik’s observation of AAL77 on September 11, 2001 and we are led to believe that this is also where he was when he made it. This is a location outside of the A-One Auto facility on Columbia Pike, about 50 feet in front of the shop.

However, as revealed a few years ago during my interview with his brother Shinki Paik, Ed was INSIDE the shop when the plane flew by.

Shinki Interview

Now, a follow-up with Ed Paik on location shows that indeed Ed was INSIDE the shop when he saw the plane. He recreates his actual POV and direction of sighting in this image.

[qimg]http://zoesflight.com/files/edpaik.JPEG[/qimg]

This demonstrates that CIT has been very deceptive and less than honest in regards to the information they have been promoting. That is why many of us have asked to see and/or hear the entire recorded eyewitness accounts recorded by CIT, NOT the edited and staged versions they have released in their productions.

Craig, it is time to release ALL of the recorded interview footage. It is time for a new investigation and a new movement, or should I say the CIT-Truth Now movement. This is a case of "eyewitness speaks, conspiracy revealed", but the conspirators are Crag and Aldo, and the conspiracy is to conceal the truth.
Click to expand...

one more:
beachnut said:
beachnut said:
Boger tells everyone he watched Flight 77 enter the Pentagon. CIT witness says 77 impacted the Pentagon; all CIT witnesses say 77 impacted the Pentagon while Craig says north and the witnesses point to the south. CIT is comedy if they were not telling lies about dead people.

CIT witnesses point to the south; oops

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/cit10221pointssouth.jpg[/qimg]
Points south and says 77 impacted Pentagon!

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/citw22311pointssouth.jpg[/qimg]
Points south and says 77 impacted Pentagon!

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/cit10222pointssouth.jpg[/qimg]
Points south and says 77 impacted Pentagon! This NWO operative says 77 flew over the Navy annex, and he is right, 77 was at exactly on the real flight path and could be seen over the Annex!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Several posts moved to AAH. Keep it civil, folks, and that also means do not call people by things other than their user names unless it is clear that it is in a friendly way.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
roscoe the first said:
Keep attacking me
Click to expand...
OK, I think I'm done here. Why do so many of these guys have a persecution complex.

roscoe, kindly go through every post in this thread and find the one where I "attacked" you. Geez.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
No you wont look in case you see something you cannot deal with. It's OK it's a common condition and it has a name.
Click to expand...

That's right and the name of the condition is called the 911 twoof movement, common signs are aversion, deception, name calling, cherry picking, quote mining, we have seen it all here before, you are not presenting anything new, not a drop that has not been discussed here already, its 2010 nine years sonny, get that new investigation going already! I believe you said it best when you stated to put up or shut up, well champ, the floor is yours, enlighten, please, we are all waiting for you to show us the error in our ways of thinking and rationalization. I mean we all know YouTube videos are the be all end all of pwoof of da twoof.
 
OK, roscoe the first, I will give it one last try.

Please explain what you meant about "my" government lying about a plane's location. Be specific.

Please have a gander at this post and give us your thoughts.
 
carlitos said:
OK, roscoe the first, I will give it one last try.

Please explain what you meant about "my" government lying about a plane's location. Be specific.

Please have a gander at this post and give us your thoughts.
Click to expand...

You want me to be specific? OK

Look at the video and concentrate on the phrase. The Official story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom