'Told you so': psychic predicted Babs surgery

Technically correct, I'm sure, but because the valves control the direction of blood flow through the heart, Van Praagh's claim that there was an "issue" with Walters' blood might seem to her more like a hit than a miss at this point.

By that logic, if she'd been shot that could also be a success, since there'd be a problem with the blood as it keeps escaping from the wound.
 
Let's see if I have this straight.

He guessed there was something currently wrong with her blood and is proven wrong.

10 months later, there is something wrong with a muscle.

Is that about the size of it?
The article quoted in the OP is wrong.

Van Praagh's "diagnosis" was made in July 2008.
Here's a YouTube vid of her appearance on The View where she discusses what Van Praagh said to her.


He was "concerned" about a lower back problem and a high white blood cell count.

Nothing to do with a dodgy heart valve.

Massive FAIL.
 
Last edited:
The article quoted in the OP is wrong.

Van Praagh's "diagnosis" was made in July 2008.
Here's a YouTube vid of her appearance on The View where she discusses what Van Praagh said to her.
Details. He made the prediction in 2010...plus minus 5years.
 
Did he also say that he really, really, really knew she had a problem with her heart, but that he didn't say anything about it because he thought he must be wrong, and didn't want to appear to be less than perfect in every way? Bonus points for that footage. :D
 
Everything is a hit to a psychic. It's rather silly for the press to cover such non-stories. Must have been a slow news day.
 
Did he also say that he really, really, really knew she had a problem with her heart, but that he didn't say anything about it because he thought he must be wrong, and didn't want to appear to be less than perfect in every way? Bonus points for that footage. :D

I believe he did - he mentioned that his logic overcame his instinct and he failed to mention it, but he definitely did see it and it is interesting nonetheless and there should be further testing.
Then he said something about kidneys, shoes and a napkin.
 
Technically correct, I'm sure, but because the valves control the direction of blood flow through the heart, Van Praagh's claim that there was an "issue" with Walters' blood might seem to her more like a hit than a miss at this point.

Can you honestly read that back and not see how feeble it sounds? Really? Genuinely?
 
Everything is a hit to a psychic. It's rather silly for the press to cover such non-stories. Must have been a slow news day.
I've seen slow news days. On the slowest of the slow news days, this would not be news.

Now I admit, I am somewhat old-fashioned in this respect, treating "news" with a certain respect that evokes notions of civic importance and public education. I believe it was Jay Leno who pointedly illustrated that this sort of respect was lost when the major TV networks (and many major newspapers) in 1993 began reporting a story about a woman who cut off her husband's wang. Leno remarked rhetorically something like, "Can you IMAGINE Walter Cronkite reporting THAT story??"

There still exists, I think, a general concept of what is "newsworthy," and I would bet that reputable schools of journalism still teach about it. There are plenty of publicity seekers and folks who want free advertising and con men and ignoramuses and blowhards and general nutcases out there, and those who report what they want to pass off as "news" NEED to filter out the news from the garbage.

The story with Van Praagh belongs in the "garbage" category.


129022457830830327.jpg
 
I believe he did - he mentioned that his logic overcame his instinct and he failed to mention it, but he definitely did see it and it is interesting nonetheless and there should be further testing.
Then he said something about kidneys, shoes and a napkin.
Is he now channelling Anita?
 
It's amazing how desperate psychics get to be. I'm sure that his groupies were entranced before he made up the rest of the story.
 
The article quoted in the OP is wrong.

Van Praagh's "diagnosis" was made in July 2008.
Here's a YouTube vid of her appearance on The View where she discusses what Van Praagh said to her.


He was "concerned" about a lower back problem and a high white blood cell count.

Nothing to do with a dodgy heart valve.

Massive FAIL.
Good catch!
 
Actually, from what I heard, somewhere around July of last year (2009) give or take a few months, doctors predicted that Barbara was going to need surgery "before June" of this year (what I heard was that it was about a year ago that she was told that). Then she went in for a checkup and they told her it needs to be now.

The host on Dr Radio (Kimberly Deore - not one of my favorites, but that is a different issue) went with the, "Wow, what happened to indicate that it had to be NOW?" route, and had a cardiologist talk about that. My view was more of, "Well, they said it had to be done BEFORE June, and we are in May...."

Hey, chalk up another successful prediction for the medical community.
 
Technically correct, I'm sure, but because the valves control the direction of blood flow through the heart, Van Praagh's claim that there was an "issue" with Walters' blood might seem to her more like a hit than a miss at this point. Perhaps she'll provide her perspective after she recovers.
Have you ever thought about applying for the MDC? Not having an ounce of shame or self-respect has got to be supernatural.
 
Actually, from what I heard, somewhere around July of last year (2009) give or take a few months, doctors predicted that Barbara was going to need surgery "before June" of this year...


Wow! The doctors are psychic as well! ;)
 
White blood cell counts have nothing to do with heart function, at least apropos of what is being referred to with Mrs. Walters.


Screw the centrifuge! Call Van Praugh!
 
The article quoted in the OP is wrong.

Van Praagh's "diagnosis" was made in July 2008.
Here's a YouTube vid of her appearance on The View where she discusses what Van Praagh said to her.


He was "concerned" about a lower back problem and a high white blood cell count.

Nothing to do with a dodgy heart valve.

Massive FAIL.



Typical comment by the psychic at the end of the clip, "I was trying to help" and "how dare she tell me off on her television show."
 
From May 12, 2010 New York Post:

Backstage, Van Praagh told Walters that he believed there was an issue with her blood.


See http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/told_you_so_psychic_predicted_babs_8IlKPCQ8c04AlhWVQEIGFJ

Technically correct, I'm sure, but because the valves control the direction of blood flow through the heart, Van Praagh's claim that there was an "issue" with Walters' blood might seem to her more like a hit than a miss at this point. Perhaps she'll provide her perspective after she recovers.

If you look hard enough, couldn't you find that everyone has some sort of issue with their blood? Slightly below normal blood sugar level, slightly higher than normal blood pressure, etc. "Issue" is so vague and all-inclusive as to be meaningless. Somebody should tell him that.:D


According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the leading causes of death in the USA for 2006 were, in order, the following:


Heart disease
Cancer
Stroke
Chronic lower respiratory diseases
Accidents
Alzheimer's disease
Influenza and pneumonia
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, nephrosis
Septicemia.

In all of the above, excepting Alzheimer's, patients "have issues with their blood".


http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
 
--- He was "concerned" about a lower back problem and a high white blood cell count.

Nothing to do with a dodgy heart valve.

Massive FAIL.


Ah, but the heart pumps blood to the lower back, so...

so...

James Van Praagh is an idiot.
 

Back
Top Bottom