I saw this on VisionFromFeeling's website:
I can't see how this type of interview advances skepticism. In my mind once a claimant fails the test, they should be granted no more publicity at the expense of skeptics. We've seen post hoc rationalizations from VFF and pretty much every claimant who has failed a test. The idea behind these challenges is to get them to stop talking and start proving. On the rare occasion we get one to step up to the challenge, what good can come from giving them a platform for talking again?
Her IIG test has been talked to death. The video tape is there for those who missed it. The IIG has been interviewed about it. What is the purpose of giving her a platform, especially when the interviewees seemingly don't participate in the discussions here? That's just the type of thing that can be exploited.
What are your thoughts on this?
www.VisionFromFeeling.com
I will be making a guest appearance on the Radio Show at the Rational Alchemy, starring Skeptics Jeff Wagg, Brian Walsh, and Nigel Aves. We discuss my IIG test for an entire hour!
I can't see how this type of interview advances skepticism. In my mind once a claimant fails the test, they should be granted no more publicity at the expense of skeptics. We've seen post hoc rationalizations from VFF and pretty much every claimant who has failed a test. The idea behind these challenges is to get them to stop talking and start proving. On the rare occasion we get one to step up to the challenge, what good can come from giving them a platform for talking again?
Her IIG test has been talked to death. The video tape is there for those who missed it. The IIG has been interviewed about it. What is the purpose of giving her a platform, especially when the interviewees seemingly don't participate in the discussions here? That's just the type of thing that can be exploited.
What are your thoughts on this?
Last edited:
