So how did the passenger's DNA get from Newark to Shanksville in 120 minutes?
ahm
You cannot presume what has not been proven. Rational adults starting with those having average intelligence know that you cannot do that and they would not allow baited or loaded or presumptuous questions to be asked of them in most contexts.
The 9/11 myth creates an exception, though.
People are willing to believe in the 9/11 myth without the normal standards of proof being applied and without the normal ways of confirming events took place being used, let alone examined or tested.
Questioning of the 9/11 myth offends those who have a vested interest in not putting the reputation of the US for common decency at risk. That, too, is based on a presumption. I do not know who or what entity or entities did 9/11 and I do not blame anyone or any entity or any country. I do not think it possible to formulate a valid hypothesis on who did 9/11 until we have a firmer grasp of what happened.
That is a much longer discussion and going there would take us off topic.
As to the topic of this thread, there's no mystery here. I know why you and Big Al are miffed. You go along, unquestioningly, with the common myth of FL 93. You can do that. What you cannot do is demand that I do the same. I require proof of each aspect of the 9/11 myth as it relates to FL 93 and will not proceed to the next layer of the deception in the absence of proof of the prior one.
Your question is no different than the question:
"When did you stop beating your spouse?"
On a good day, AW, having that penchant for defining fallacies, will know that this thread is chock full of presumption when it comes to the question of whether or not a jetliner crashed in Shanksville. I doubt AW will admit this openly, however.
Most people understand that you cannot presume what hasn't been proven when you put the question as above in the spouse beating context. That is, most people understand it is a dirty trick to ask someone when they stopped doing something for which there's no prior proof the person did that to which the "when did you stop..." premise applies. Asking about passengers on planes that haven't been shown to have crashed in Shanksville is the exact same thing.
And, people here know that, but cannot bring themselves to admit it.
Here in this thread, people do not realize they are asking the exact same kind of question when they jump to the issue of passengers without ever having proven a jetliner crashed. Because they cannot realize they are doing that, the discussion of the FBI botching the investigation and thereby putting us in the position where we cannot know what happened simply doesn't bother those who are participating in this thread.
That you are not bothered by presumption does not excuse or condone the use of it.
The emotion of 9/11 clouds and in many instances defeats the capacity for application of the ordinary rules of reason.
