KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked
- Thread starter Galileo
- Start date
Galileo
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,368
Mass murder isn't funny. It's funny to the necons, but not to most of us. Do you have any intelligent comments on the article?
When I'm snacking, like when I'm watching the upcoming Super Bowl, I like to munch on more pungent cheeses, preferably with those rice-based, crunchy crackers, or Carr's Water Crackers. That way, you don't overpower the cheese taste, yet you still get a little crunch. Favorites include Emmenthaler, Havarti, Manchego and the occasional brie.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
It's not an intelligent article. The responses are "in kind".
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
My favorite cheese is Emmenthal/Swiss.
On a related note, Kraft™ Three Cheese Ranch is my favorite dressing. I use it all the time, sometimes even on salad!
On a related note, Kraft™ Three Cheese Ranch is my favorite dressing. I use it all the time, sometimes even on salad!
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
You know buying Kraft supports our Patriots.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
As a 40+ year fan, I can handle this "speed bump".
Lol @ the Patriots.
If I had to guess, the favorite cheeses of the cast from Scooby Doo would be as follows:
Full milkfat, imported brie
Stinky, overripe Tilsiter
Portwine cheese spread on ritz
Elegant, aged cheddar
Cheezy dog bones, or maybe Kraft singles
If scrappy-doo is still around, probably famunda.
Full milkfat, imported brie Stinky, overripe Tilsiter Portwine cheese spread on ritz Elegant, aged cheddar Cheezy dog bones, or maybe Kraft singlesIf scrappy-doo is still around, probably famunda.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
But using your standards of "reasonable doubt" and logic no one would ever be convicted of anything. That's why the paper is not intelligent. It's a series of excuses.
BasqueArch
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,871
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty applies in a court of law only, not in the court of public opinion like here at JREF. The evidence for his guilt is conclusive. Truthers presume KSM innocent before the trial as shown in the OP, using this same court of public opinion standard. It is not surprising truthers are hypocritical and mistaken to accuse the public of not assuming innocence after the evidence is available and before the trial. For example truthers believe Bush and Chaney are guilty of crimes before any charges are brought or trials taken place. No presumption of innocence here.
“The presumption of innocence, an ancient tenet of criminal law, is actually a misnomer. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the presumption of the innocence of a criminal defendant is best described as an assumption of innocence that is indulged in the absence of contrary evidence (Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 98 S. Ct. 1930, 56 L. Ed. 2d 468 [1978]). It is not considered evidence of the defendant's innocence, and it does not require that a mandatory inference favorable to the defendant be drawn from any facts in evidence. …
Aside from the related requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the presumption of innocence is largely symbolic. The reality is that no defendant would face trial unless somebody — the crime victim, the prosecutor, a police officer — believed that the defendant was guilty of a crime. After the government has presented enough evidence to constitute probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed a crime, the accused need not be treated as if he or she was innocent of a crime, and the defendant may be jailed with the approval of the court.”
http://www.answers.com/topic/presumption-of-innocence
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty applies in a court of law only, not in the court of public opinion like here at JREF.
Evidence of KSM ‘s guilt:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/CSRT_Summary_of_Evidence_memo_for_Khalid_Sheikh_Mohammed
KSM is guilty.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Indeed, but I've never met a truther who lets a little thing like a double standard get in the way of anything.
Parmesan cheese was first referenced in the Parma area of Italy in the 1300's. Given this fact, it is quite possible that a certain Italian physicist, mathematician, astronomer, and philosopher may have enjoyed this fine cheese.
BasqueArch
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,871
Galileo Galilei’s passing fancy with parma-chen was unmatched by his passion for Spanish anchovies if we are to believe his nun-daughter’s salty memoirs where she reproaches the Pope for mistaking her father with the coetaneous Galileo Goober, the Dionysian, Inquisition Denier.
=================================================
You can lead a truther to facts but you can’t reason him out of something he was not reasoned into. - Nutso Swift.
Last edited:
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Indeed, just like you have presumed Bush and Cheney and Firefighters and first responders and eye witnesses and justaboutanybodywhodisageeswithyou as guilty until proven innocent so I wouldn't whine too much
Oh, and I LOVE a nice Stilton with Red Flame grapes!
Last edited:
Macgyver1968
Philosopher
Cheese Wiz...directly sprayed into the mouth from the can. It's better than cheese...it's "cheese-food". Any cheese that doesn't require refridgeration totally pwns your "real" cheese.