Whoopeee. Tomorrow is the big day to launch our p0ress conference celebrating the first brave 1,000 Architects, Engineers and associates from around the world who signed the ae911truth petition. I hope that some of the 80 American licensed civil/structural engineers who have signed the petition will show and some of the 3 Structural Engineers petition signers from California.
You forgot to mention that ae911truthers are a joyful bunch, who know how to party. "Stop and smell the roses", all of that. Compare that to the NIST fuddy duddies, who just write big books of unverified and unverifiable flubber.
I hope there's a videographer at their big shindig. I'd like to see Richard Gage and Dr. Stephen Jones doing the macarena.
Watch for the big spread in your local and national paper over the weekend. We have had consistent growth of about one a day since we started, so we will hit 2,000 in late 2012 and 5,000 late 2023. By 2100 we will have 34,000 architects and engineers from around the world. Its a pretty big number even if you consider that in Maine there are about 20,000PE's and probably twice that including unlicensed PE's, and double again for architects.
I can't think of any famous architects or engineers from Maine, so while comparison with A&E populations in Maine are usually so enlightening, we can't always rely on that bellwether state.
Unfortunately once you have signed there is no way to remove your name unless you write in and request your name be removed, even if you are dead. So eventually we will have more members than there are engineers, but it may take a while.
In case of sudden, unexpected death, deceased members can make requests for removal from the ae911truth membership list through mediums. To prove their identity, they need only provide some tidbits of information that only they and their significant others could know. Just saying "Hugo says, ...... 911 was an inside job" won't cut it - everybody knows that.
Engineers and architects solve problems for a living, so figuring out a solution this easy when they, errr, ain't, should be a piece of cake. They've had a lifetime of practice. Literally.
Lack of support from real architects and engineers doesn't mean to say that we are wrong.
Lack of disparagement of NIST's WTC7 report by comedians doesn't mean to say that NIST is, in fact, correct - or even serious. It could simply mean that NIST'ians have a bad sense of humor. Maybe if they'd learn to relax..... Hmmmm.
Say, maybe Gage can teach the bad comedians from NIST the macarena!
