Ya think?
Yes, mudlark has linked to the Balsamo/Desideri paper many times. Several of us have pointed out that pages 1 and 4 of that paper contain mistakes. Instead of addressing the math, mudlark's been telling us to take it up with Balsamo, whose 11.2g/10.14g/2223g/58g calculations were off by a factor of 5 to 1000+ and have become a running joke.
Oh dear: mudlark appears to be telling fibs.
Several people here have provided links to legitimate mathematics that refute mudlark's and/or Balsamo's assertions. It is mudlark who has steadfastly refused to discuss mathematics or physics here.
Smith, you keep SAYING that the math has been debunked but
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5489387&postcount=647
Smith said:
¨Unfortunately, you have also given the impression of denying those logical consequences of your argument. Hence it would be a waste of time for PfT or us or anybody to run the math on those specific 8 or 9 flight paths. Your logical inconsistency already refutes your argument.¨
You wanted
specific parameters from witness testimonies.
You asked for the impossible yet Balsamo tried to compensate by running various witness compatible flightpaths AND at the official 540mph speed.
You want to argue math with somebody who has already admitted that it would be above their head on the technicalities but you haven´t the cojones to argue your point with the people who actually presented the math.
You mention the 11.2 g in the full knowledge that Pilotsfor911truth have publically admitted their mistake.
I have personally asked Rob balsamo if you are barred from the site and he said ´No´
He told me that you are more than welcome to argue your points with him. Either at the forum or in public.
Your excuse that you would be treated unfairly is a cop-out.
I´m here taking abuse and reading your and other´s snide comments but that doesn´t deter me.
Mudlark said:
Originally Posted by mudlark
You can't calculate where the shadow would be without knowing the altitude of the plane. If the plane "almost hit my roof" as Edward claimed and was "only about 3 feet above the Navy Annex" as claimed by Darius Prather there is no reason it couldn't have cast a shadow over Shinki's shop from the north path.
North of the Tropic of Cancer, it would be quite remarkable for any object's solar shadow to fall south of the object itself. I'm talking about planet Earth, of course; shadows may behave differently on TrutherWorld.
What do you not understand about that post??
Are you telling me that a shadow could NOT have been cast on Ed Paik´s shop given the low altitude Ed paik described and NOT 450ft agl as suggested by BCR.
He claimed that he thought the plane was going to hit the ROOF.
What angle are you suggesting the sun was at that a shadow would have MISSED??
haha
It just tastes sweeter that you made a smartass comment to follow your illogical argument. Thanks. I knew i could count on you.
As an old friend, whatever his name is, used to say
kthxbye
