I wonder if the CITiots are fully aware of the extent of their fraud, or if they have somehow deluded themselves into not seeing it.
I'm sure they think they're doing it for a Higher Cause. Kinda like the liars for Jesus.

Well, I think it all goes back to the complete inability to admit making mistakes that has been seen repeatedly when dealing with 9/11 CTists. I am guessing that at the beginning, the Dyspeptic Duo saw the money being made by people like Avery and thought they could replicate that success. Even though they are most likely losing money over this whole nonsense, they simply cannot admit that it was a mistake from the get-go.
They are NWO operatives tasked with discrediting the 911 Truth Movement by making it look like a bunch of crazy morons. They have been very successful in their assignment and I was told at the last NWO meeting that they might be promoted to run the Memphis NWO operation.![]()
Are you John Farmer/911files? If so, I didn't notice that you were back until now. Good to see you again.
Did I blow my cover?Interesting!
Although this is where he draws the path of the plane it would put the plane more than twice its wingspan north of the VDOT tower which the next day Paik speculates may have been clipped by the plane.
¨Pickering: Did you actually SEE it hit the tower or you THOUGHT it hit the tower...Did you see the repair guys working on it?
Ed Paik: I DIDN´T SEE IT HIT THE TOWER, I SAW THE GUYS WORKING AT IT THE NEXT MORNING¨
We note that if Paik was in the parking lot where the CiT interviewed him he cannot see the roof of the Annex but he can see the VDOT tower.
At best this suggests that Paik's drawing is incorrect. It is unlikely that he would have wondered if the plane had clipped the tower if he never saw the plane anywhere close top the tower and especially if it were more than a wingspan north. However given that he cannot see the Annex from where he was he could easily be incorrect in his estimation of where the Annex is.
Now if the port wing actually was within a few feet of the Sheraton (as Alauf's literal statement suggests) AND the center of the fuselage within 75 feet of the VDOT tower (which would certainly allow Paik's next day consideration to be a valid speculation) it would mean that the plane was essentially following Columbia Pike, along a path that would take it south of the Citgo.
´..and then at the time feeling like IT ALMOST HIT MY ROOF´
,and possibly the Annex? 55 feet is only 5 stories
Who is telling the truth here?
Mudlark?
Why do 5 of the 13 witnesses place the plane's flightpath over the annex and everyone else puts the flightpath north of the annex?
you know, if truthers spent as much time working for a new investigation, as they spend debating with debunkers on JREF, there would have been a new investigation by now.
***** and giggles. that's all this is about. just ***** and giggles.