Split Thread 'Nose-out' footage

[TJM]

AJM WAS REPLYING TO ME WITH THE WRONG PHOTOS? IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? WHAT'S UP?

I've posted the two different photos enough times. Do you still not get it?

Wow. That was a horrible effort. Even for HI.

Amen. He's earned another timeout and apparently it's a well needed one.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Planted wreckage. Couldn't be more obvious.

Oh really?? How are you able to come to this conclusion?

 

[carlitos]

Maybe he's the one that "planted" it?

 

[twinstead]

I suspect he assumes the plane parts were planted because the plane never hit the Pentagon, and he assumes the plane never hit the Pentagon because the plane parts were planted.

It's a win-win situation.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Maybe he's the one that "planted" it?

Seems to be the usual truther story..and he's sticking to it.

 

[carlitos]

Circular arguments rock!

 

[Arus808]

Why is it obvious?

Yeah...so obvious....hundreds of odd sized pieces ranging from the size of a hand to as big as a person. all planted..on the roof of a building..

bardamu, tell us how many people it took to carry all these pieces without anyone in the building the wreckage was found on, not noticing these strange people carrying what looks like airplane facade up the stairs or in the elevators...

truthers are really not good at grasping reality.

 

[TruthersLie]

This image is different than...

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/3.jpg[/qimg]

this image.

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/2.jpg[/qimg]

That's all I was trying to say.

Some debunkers obviously missed that those are two different pictures.

In this one...

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/2.jpg[/qimg]

it looks like the white paint of the "6" intersects the window.

It doesn't look like that in this image.

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/3.jpg[/qimg]

Is that spoon fed enough for the debunkers?

Again and again... it is called perspective.

you are using a 2d picture and not understanding that when you move in three dimension, it makes the new 2d picture look a little different. Do you need glasses? Maybe you can get some on your newest vacation.

 

[TruthersLie]

I know they are not shot from the same angle. I've known this unlike some debunkers here from the beginning.

Where the paint is in one image looks different than the other. It goes right up to the window hole in the one.

Umm no it does not.

The top picture (your first one) you can see that the piece of debris is RIPPED right below the number.

when you move to a new perspective in the second picture it makes it seem like there is no rip in the debris.

It is called perspective. You should look that up, like RADAR, if the FDR is part of the plane and the contact information from AA and UA to find out exactly what was recovered and what they will do with the debris.

Now that you have the time, look it up.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

What I love is the supposed claim by no planers that there are no real witnesses, but at the same time they refuse to accept any witness that actually says they saw planes hit. Oh that and the fact they would more than likely harass anyone that didn't agree with them.

Plus when witnesses are produced,the 'No planers' immediately dismiss them as liars (without proof of course)

How can these No Planers think nobody in NY or NJ saw the planes hit the towers????

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/aircraftpartsnyc911

No plane parts huh? here are pics of plane parts, including American Airlines parts and accessories.

'No Planers' think the plane wreckage was planted.
They're idiots.