Split Thread 'Nose-out' footage

[Slayhamlet]

One picture the paint looks like where it should be.

Another picture the paint looks like it intersects with the window.

Two different pictures.

Despite your lies to the contrary, no one said or in any other way indicated that they thought the two pictures were the same.

Some debunkers didn't even realize these were two different pictures as they were calling me stupid. Even though they now pretend they did know. lol

Repeating a lie doesn't make it true. Quote the post(s) which you think indicate that someone does not realize that the two utterly different photos are the same or admit you're lying.

But I still want to know. Why does the paint in the one picture look like it is in a different spot than it is in the other picture? That's all I ever asked.

It looks that way because you are not interpreting the photo correctly.

Are there one or two pieces of fuselage in this photo?

Do some debunkers just pretend to be stupid as a last resort?

I was about to say the same about you, but then I remembered that pretending to be stupid is your only resort ever.

 

[Slayhamlet]

Come on Slay. If you knew that then why did you post this? lol! And still. You don't address what I asked.

Because the assertion is so mind-bogglingly stupid that I didn't think even you were capable of plumbing such depths of stupid.

And I did answer the question, btw, which is why you didn't even respond to that post. I'm doubtful you even read it.

 

[Algebra34]

Because the assertion is so mind-bogglingly stupid that I didn't think even you were capable of plumbing such depths of stupid.

And I did answer the question, btw, which is why you didn't even respond to that post. I'm doubtful you even read it.

That's why you posted the wrong picture right? Because you knew exactly what I was talking about right?

lol Go away.

 

[Mancman]

It's the same debris from a different angle.

End of story, timewasting troll.

 

[Algebra34]

Holey Mackeral. It doesn't get any denser than this.

 

[Slayhamlet]

Yeah right Slay. That's why you posted the wrong picture. lol

Here's the exchange:

One piece of debris. Two pieces of skin still connected by a section of former.

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/3.jpg[/qimg]

The red outline shows this debris in it's original location.

[qimg]http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/6.jpg[/qimg]

You can see the lower right hand corner of the 2 in this photo, right where it's suppose to be.

Not that any of this matters, I was just curious. Why does what looks like should be the "6" there in the bottom picture, intersect with the window hole?

Anyone? Well not just anyone. Debunkers?

Same picture.

It's pretty obvious which picture AJM is claiming is the same as the one he posted, namely the one you mentioned in your post, which I have bolded.

 

[332nd]

Holey Mackeral. It doesn't get any denser than this.

Do you need the answers explained (in more detail) to you?

 

[Algebra34]

Here's the exchange:


It's pretty obvious which picture AJM is claiming is the same as the one he posted, namely the one you mentioned in your post, which I have bolded.

Those aren't the two pictures I was comparing. I wasn't comparing a closeup to a far away shot. Do you not get this? This is hilarious.

 

[Slayhamlet]

That's why you posted the wrong picture right? Because you knew exactly what I was talking about right?

lol Go away.

I correctly posted the two pictures that AJM was comparing.

Is there only one piece or are there two separate pieces of the fuselage in this picture?

http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/2.jpg

 

[Algebra34]

I correctly posted the two pictures that AJM was comparing.

Is there only one piece or are there two separate pieces of the fuselage in this picture?

http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af74/waypastvne/2.jpg

AJM WAS REPLYING TO ME WITH THE WRONG PHOTOS? IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? WHAT'S UP?

I've posted the two different photos enough times. Do you still not get it?

 

[332nd]

AJM WAS REPLYING TO ME WITH THE WRONG PHOTOS? IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? WHAT'S UP?

I've posted the two different photos enough times. Do you still not get it?

... Should we explain why it's the same pic guys? I really don't think he's going to get it.

 

[DavidJames]

... Should we explain why it's the same pic guys? I really don't think he's going to get it.

It's not that he doesn't get it, it's that he's trolling. Someone had to pick up the slack with Bill Smith took a hike.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Once again. Debunkers never answer.

Once again, your perception is lacking.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Holey Mackeral. It doesn't get any denser than this.

So your lack of perception leads you into suspicion of planted plane debris?

Look at the photo again..CLOSELY!! Those are 2 seprate pieces; Do you get it? That section is broken into seprate pieces. The one photo you're enamored with makes the section appear as one whole piece like, you know, from one piece setting on top of another because of the camera angle.
But again, THIS SECTION IS BROKEN INTO PIECES.

ETA: Now are you going to acknowledge this fact or just remain obtuse?

 

[332nd]

It's not that he doesn't get it, it's that he's trolling. Someone had to pick up the slack with Bill Smith took a hike.

Oh I agree he's trolling, but I really think he doesn't see why it's the same pic. Kinda funny.

 

[DavidJames]

Oh I agree he's trolling, but I really think he doesn't see why it's the same pic.

I don't think he cares. He's baiting the hook and casting.

And keeps reeling them in.

 

[Reactor drone]

One picture the paint looks like where it should be.

Another picture the paint looks like it intersects with the window.

Two different pictures.

But I still want to know. Why does the paint in the one picture look like it is in a different spot than it is in the other picture? That's all I ever asked.

IS THIS SPOON FED ENOUGH FOR DEBUNKERS? YET???

Do some debunkers just pretend to be stupid as a last resort?

This is about as simple as I can show the perspective of the parts.

Spoon fed enough for you?

 

[bardamu]

Planted wreckage. Couldn't be more obvious.

 

[332nd]

Planted wreckage. Couldn't be more obvious.

Why is it obvious?

 

[dtugg]

Wow. That was a horrible effort. Even for HI.