Split Thread 'Nose-out' footage

[TJM]

Anyone? Well not just anyone. Debunkers?

Same picture.

 

[TruthersLie]

Not that any of this matters, I was just curious. Why does what looks like should be the "6" there in the bottom picture, intersect with the window hole?

It is called perspective in a 2 dimensional photo...

you know something else you don't understand.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Not that any of this matters, I was just curious. Why does what looks like should be the "6" there in the bottom picture, intersect with the window hole?

You have not studied that photo enough. Look closer and see how those 2 sections fit by lining up the top parts of the window.

 

[TJM]

You have not studied that photo enough. Look closer and see how those 2 sections fit by lining up the top parts of the window.

I'm sensing a common thread here, and I wasn't trying to be cruel when I said:

No insult intended Algebra, but you really should have your eyes checked if you're being sincere.

And I'm not be cruel by repeating it. Seriously Algebra, get'em checked.

 

[MIKILLINI]

And I'm not be cruel by repeating it. Seriously Algebra, get'em checked.

It's not difficult to line up the sections and see the "6" is above the window. It's also easy to see that Alge doesn't want to acknowledge this by his disclaimer, which I have highlited in bold below;

Not that any of this matters, I was just curious. Why does what looks like should be the "6" there in the bottom picture, intersect with the window hole?

 

[Algebra34]

This image is different than...

this image.

That's all I was trying to say.

Some debunkers obviously missed that those are two different pictures.

In this one...

it looks like the white paint of the "6" intersects the window.

It doesn't look like that in this image.

Is that spoon fed enough for the debunkers?

 

[beachnut]

The color balance is interesting.

This image is different than...

this image.

That's all I was trying to say.

Some debunkers obviously missed that those are two different pictures.

In this one...

it looks like the white paint of the "6" intersects the window.

It doesn't look like that in this image.

Is that spoon fed enough for the debunkers?

Better check again, the photos have the same stuff, different perspective. This was funny. Failure is common in your posts, why? Are you discrediting 911 truth on purpose?

 

[Algebra34]

The color balance is interesting.

Better check again, the photos have the same stuff, different perspective. This was funny. Failure is common in your posts, why? Are you discrediting 911 truth on purpose?

I know they are not shot from the same angle. I've known this unlike some debunkers here from the beginning.

Where the paint is in one image looks different than the other. It goes right up to the window hole in the one.

 

[Furcifer]

He doesn't see the obvious difference in the pictures?

Is this some comedy routine?

 

[Algebra34]

He doesn't see the obvious difference in the pictures?

Is this some comedy routine?

Who me? Am I the only one who does see it?

 

[beachnut]

I know they are not shot from the same angle. I've known this unlike some debunkers here from the beginning.

Where the paint is in one image looks different than the other. It goes right up to the window hole in the one.

Are you supporting the lie of no plane? Why do you support the delusions of liars? If you have some evidence have you contacted the FBI? Do you understand this is a skeptic forum and you have zero evidence to support the lies you seem to poorly support?

 

[Algebra34]

Are you supporting the lie of no plane? Why do you support the delusions of liars? If you have some evidence have you contacted the FBI? Do you understand this is a skeptic forum and you have zero evidence to support the lies you seem to poorly support?

Why are you avoiding what I pointed out. Don't worry about what I might think or believe. Just address what I pointed out.

 

[tsig]

Why are you avoiding what I pointed out. Don't worry about what I might think or believe. Just address what I pointed out.

Same scene, two pictures from different locations.

 

[Algebra34]

Once again. Debunkers never answer.

 

[TJM]

Why are you avoiding what I pointed out. Don't worry about what I might think or believe. Just address what I pointed out.

Two different pictures from two different perspectives. We don't even know if they're from the same photographer or if anything has been moved between shots.

You fail again.

 

[Algebra34]

Two different pictures from two different perspectives. We don't even know if they're from the same photographer or if anything has been moved between shots.

You fail again.

You're telling me exactly what I told you and all the debunkers who failed to even realize those were two different pictures.

And still you don't/can't answer what I originally asked.

I would ask debunkers to source these pictures they base their truth on, and tell me exactly when they came out, but lets face it. I'm not delusional.

 

[Slayhamlet]

WTF? Which two pictures have any "debunkers" failed to realize were different?

 

[Algebra34]

WTF? Which two pictures have any "debunkers" failed to realize were different?

In my first post about this I pointed to a specific picture. Go back and look at the debunker response. They obviously didn't ever notice the difference.

Ever.

 

[beachnut]

Why are you avoiding what I pointed out. Don't worry about what I might think or believe. Just address what I pointed out.

This is a nose-out delusions bashing thread. A few idiots say the videos are fake, your posts need to bet back on topic or be reported as spam and delusional rants off topic.

Got support for the idiots who spew no plane; on topic please and present some evidence to garner your Pulitzer.

You pointed out you can't analyze photos; what is new?

So you think the nose out no plane dolts are full of junk? Or what?

If you want to support the nose-out loons, you need to bring your A-game if you have one. Step it up and bring some physics, math, you know real science for your photo failure.

 

[Slayhamlet]

In my first post about this I pointed to a specific picture. Go back and look at the debunker response. They obviously didn't ever notice the difference.

Ever.

You're saying that this picture:

Is not the same as this picture:

???