cantonear1968
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,657
Rodriguez Commission testimony was unavailable until NARA released the records early last year. Exactly the same thing applied to many people, though. "Behind closed doors" is a phrase used to make it sound like something significant is being hidden; now his testimony is available we can see that isn't the case.
Thanks MikeW. Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but wouldn't a rational person look at that bit of misdirection, if I feel like being kind, or lie, if I don't, and not conclude that these people who are being held up as either leaders of the truth movement or eyewitnesses to the actual event are merely perpetuating a story, something they have no proof of, for their own gain?
Since I posted this I looked more into Rodriguez's claims on Mark Robert's website. It seems to me he never started making any claims about "bombs in the basement" until well after 2004 (probably even later). It reminds me of Kevin "countdown" McPhadden(sp?) who doesn't seem to make any claims about hearing a "countdown to implosion" until well into 2007, after the "Mike the EMT" emails came out. RKOwens posted a video of McPhadden(again, sp?) at the large 9/11/06 rally where he actually talked in front of the crowd AND MADE NO MENTION OF A COUNTDOWN!!
Which leads me back to what this thread is about: how can these people be used by Ventura when a minimum of research completely discredits them or at the very least makes their claims suspicious enough not to be used? That's what I meant in my first post about how Ventura seemed to have stepped back into 2006! He seems to be going with every tried and true truther argument that hasn't withstood any scrutiny in 8 years. And, oh how many more there are: squibs, molten "steel", pulverized concrete, pyroclastic flow, oxygen starved fire, fly over, 16' hole, Lloyd England.
I guess we can expect to see a "9/11 show" about fourth episode!