• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Jesse Ventura 9/11 Conspiracy Theories On TruTV

Walter Ego

Illuminator
Walter Ego
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
3,377
Location
Dixie
Ventura took on 9/11 conspiracies on his new show on TruTv. The 9/11 episode was aired last Wednesday, December 9.

The TruTV Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura website is here.

The entire show on 9/11 can be viewed on my blog here.

(For those wondering, the original thread on this topic is in AAH here. Let's hope this one fairs better.)
 
Walter Ego said:
Ventura took on 9/11 conspiracies on his new show on TruTv. The 9/11 episode was aired last Wednesday, December 9.

The TruTV Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura website is here.

The entire show on 9/11 can be viewed on my blog here.

(For those wondering, the original thread on this topic is in AAH here. Let's hope this one fairs better.)
Click to expand...

I thought that the part about the blackboxes was interesting. And the claims about the hijackers being in the cockpit before takeoff considering this article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A6892-2004May6
Controllers' 9/11 Tape Destroyed, Report Says

Interesting but not validated in any meaningful way. In any case what if there was a hijack situation going on before takeoff that they thought at the time could be negotiated later on? Only to watch the plane fly into a building? Would they try to cover it up after the fact as to when they knew the plane was hijacked? I know. What if right? Just thought it was interesting.
 
Algebra34 said:
I thought that the part about the blackboxes was interesting. And the claims about the hijackers being in the cockpit before takeoff considering this article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A6892-2004May6
Controllers' 9/11 Tape Destroyed, Report Says

Interesting but not validated in any meaningful way. In any case what if there was a hijack situation going on before takeoff that they thought at the time could be negotiated later on? Only to watch the plane fly into a building? Would they try to cover it up after the fact as to when they knew the plane was hijacked? I know. What if right? Just thought it was interesting.
Click to expand...

Why "cover-up" something which was already happening, with witnesses every where & in the planes, who were calling their loved 1's & United Airlines & American Airlines at the time of the hijacking?

Can you explain this 1 to everybody?

That article was from 5 yrs. ago! Got anything that's updated?
 
Last edited:
This is our second chance on this topic and we're off to a bad start. :(

The issue of the the destroyed FAA tapes is addressed here.

Is there anything else about the Ventura show that anyone would like to discuss?

(He said somewhat hopefully.)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Walter Ego said:
This is our second chance on this topic and we're off to a bad start. :(

The issue of the the destroyed FAA tapes is addressed here.

Is there anything else about the Ventura show that anyone would like to discuss?

(He said somewhat hopefully.)
Click to expand...

I'm trying to discuss it and told you what I found interesting and what it made me think of. Is there anything particular about the show you would like to discuss? I watched the whole thing. I thought it did a good job but was obviously sensational in it's delivery.
 
i bet the show sucked. it was hosted by a has-been ex-wrestler and a failed governor.
 
Walter Ego said:
It's sucked canal water. Mainly it was stupid. The entire show is on YouTube here. Have you watched it?
Click to expand...

i don't watch conspiracy theory Youtube videos. haven't in more then a year.

exercise is known to create new healthy brain cells, and I don't want them ruined with truther garbage.
 
I didn't know this thread went down the drain the first time, but I'm not surprised. Again, it was just so fake to see Jesse ask with such surprise every time a stupid truther revelation came up. It made his days as a wrestler look real. He truly is an idiot.
 
parky76 said:
i don't watch conspiracy theory Youtube videos. haven't in more then a year.
Click to expand...

The show was not some skanky truther video premiered on YouTube. I was on a basic cable tv channel last week, the same channel were you can watch reruns of CoPs and Amazing Police Chases. Surely that venue must give it some caché? I mean, it's even called TruTv. What more could you want? :rolleyes:
 
The show would be better if they had Tonya Harding and Todd Bridges comment at the end of each segment.
 
DGM said:
OK Algebra:
How did you like the "thermite" experiment? Not exactly what he claims it to be ,was it?
Click to expand...

I thought it was bizarre. Van Romero? The guy who first claimed he thought there were explosive devices in the towers after watching the collapses, but then later retracted his expert opinion? Why would he even get involved with this after that? As far as the test goes it looked like it burned really hot for paint on a small spot. Is there any history of using thermite paint anywhere? How did Van Romero know how to do that?
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
OK Algebra:
How did you like the "thermite" experiment? Not exactly what he claims it to be ,was it?
Click to expand...

The National Geographic Channel did an experiment to show that a jet-fueled fire was sufficient to cause structural failure of the WTC columns.

Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center (EMRTC) designed explosives to test the effects of burning jet fuel on steel. EMRTC used a bare steel beam because the National Institute of Standards and Technology reports that much of the any fireproofing material would have been knocked off at the moment of impact. Within two minutes of igniting the fuel, the temperature peaked just above 2,000 Fahrenheit and complete structural failure occurred in less than four minutes.

Read more: http://channel.nationalgeographic.c...-4067#tab-conspiracy-vs-science#ixzz0ZWMlUtQ5
Click to expand...

This conclusion was rejected out of hand by the truthers. Not because it wasn't true, but because it didn't agree with their confirmation biases.

 
Algebra34 said:
I thought it was bizarre. Van Romero? The guy who first claimed he thought there were explosive devices in the towers after watching the collapses, but then later retracted his expert opinion? Why would he even get involved with this after that? As far as the test goes it looked like it burned really hot for paint on a small spot. Is there any history of using thermite paint anywhere? How did Van Romero know how to do that?
Click to expand...
You could make it six inches thick and you'd get about the same effect on the steel it was painted on. Even Dr Jones admits it wouldn't work as demolition device, only as a fuse to light conventional explosives (lots of them).
 
I really wonder why Jesse didn't mention Van Romero's first opinion of the tower collapses.

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said. Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures. Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts. Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures. "It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that,"
Click to expand...

Why would Van Romero even participate in this show?
 
AJM8125 said:
They paid him to.
Click to expand...

Well that very well may be true. He did quickly retract his initial expert opinion and then coincidentally got a presidential appointment. So you may be correct on your insinuation about his character.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom