• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

Can someone please explain what this Deets person has actually claimed? Because I see 3 pages of talking about his education and credentials, and zero pages on what he actually said. Can anyone outline the specifics of his claims?

And if he hasn't made any claims, why the :rule10 are we talking about him? I could care less who "signs a petition" or "joins a group". That means nothing.

apparently he is giving talks where he simply parrots Gage and Griffin. He adds nothing of his own, nothing new.

TAM:)
 
I saw his picture. Mackey is definitely cuter. We win! That and Mackey does have all that stuff out there that hasn't been countered. Unless this guy is going to counter Mackey's white paper. If he is a minion of DRG, it should be right up his (dark and creepy) alley.
 
Everything is in NASA from Debunkers to Truthers to Alien believers it seems..Have a look at this..

''24 july 2008

FORMER NASA astronaut and moon-walker Dr Edgar Mitchell - a veteran of the Apollo 14 mission - has stunningly claimed aliens exist.
And he says extra-terrestrials have visited Earth on several occasions - but the alien contact has been repeatedly covered up by governments for six decades...''

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/alternate-theories/75721-apollo-14-astronaut-claims-aliens.html
 
Last edited:
Ron Wieck called me today and suggested I should talk to, or perhaps debate, Mr. Deets. But I really do not see the point. Particularly given the total lack of work he's produced, and the fact that even the Truthers seem to be poking fun at him in this thread.

Let it die, already.
 
''24 july 2008

FORMER NASA astronaut and moon-walker Dr Edgar Mitchell - a veteran of the Apollo 14 mission - has stunningly claimed aliens exist.
And he says extra-terrestrials have visited Earth on several occasions - but the alien contact has been repeatedly covered up by governments for six decades...''



Indeed, and he is one of the loons who NYCCAN'T named in their craptacular petition to sit on their laughable vision of a "commission".
 
Ron Wieck called me today and suggested I should talk to, or perhaps debate, Mr. Deets. But I really do not see the point. Particularly given the total lack of work he's produced, and the fact that even the Truthers seem to be poking fun at him in this thread.

Let it die, already.

Dude, I know what you are talking about. Every god damn time a millionaire body builder who made his original money from working as the highest paid gigolo in America comes out as truther, everybody is always like "Oh, get 16.5 to debate him."

Hey, I am not just a great looking rich guy with a great body and a long.... history, I am a human being.

Plus, my wife Jennifer Connelly gets all pissed off when I am gone for more than a couple of hours.
 
Wait...you guys aren't seriously suggesting a "Skeptical Men" calendar are you?

Starring, in tasteful sepia-toned portraits, some of us mental beefcakes looking thoroughly unconvinced?

You'll have to talk to my agent.
 

****** I've just gotten her attention.

My perception of reality is informed by videogames, therefore I now need to duck just out of her line of sight and hide inside a cardboard box.

This reaction is more sensible than the arguments put forth by Truthers...especially ones with NASA creds.
 
I have seen many documentaries about Hawaii (the most recent ones were a series of short films titled "Jon and Kate plus 8" and "Dog the bounty hunter") and I am confident in saying that that particular fashion of dress is common at evening beach party's (colloquially known as a luau). I have also seen a 50+ year old Samoan woman perform the Hawaiian dance called the "Hula" live and in person and because of that I am certain that there is absolutely no way that I ever want to see that again... Some things cannot be unseen. :cartman:
 
nodarthvader2640823.jpg
 
Wrong. On pg. 32 of his book, Omissions and Distortions Griffin clearly criticizes The Commission for "its failure to even mention the collapse of Building 7".

My italics.
DRG does indeed say that, but someone in the TM got it wrong and believed it failed to mention WTC7. Since then, lots of people get it the wrong way, which gives a wonderful chance to see how uninformed they are, just blindly believing what others say without checking for themselves or actually reading the report to know what they are criticizing. Even Gage got that wrong:

NIST has not yet released a final report on the proposed cause for the collapse of WTC 7, nor did the Commission mention that building in its Final Report.
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/7
(ETA: btw, that's signed by 911research, STJ911 and AE911truth.)

(One just needs to search for 7 WTC in the report to see the mentions to it, because that's how it's mentioned. Online version here, for commodity: http://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/US/9-11/911Report.htm.)

This guy is parroting Gage (not even Griffin), so this guy says the same crap everyone who hasn't checked the facts or read the report says.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom