• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

RedIbis said:
DRG's claim is that the collapse of WTC 7 was not mentioned in the Commission Report. Deets was incorrect when he said that the bldg wasn't mentioned at all.

I'd bet he simply meant that the collapse of the bldg was not covered in The Report.
Click to expand...

I doubt it since everything he says is just well worn truther statements which is why he repeated the exact claim by David Ray Griffin which is that the 911 Commission Report didnt even mention Building 7.
 
Last edited:
Ever wonder why all these truther experts never show up here, and leave people like atavisms and RedIbis who can't argue anything to convince all of us sheeple?
 
I used to work for NASA. Technically, I suppose I was an engineer, albeit a software one. There was even a bit of my code on the first space shuttle - that and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee these days (it's probably all been rewritten by now). The only thing I know about buildings and structures is that I once helped build a garage that is still standing. My NASA experience does not automatically qualify me to speak as an expert about architecture, avionics, properties of metals under stress, psychology of terrorists or anything else related to 9/11 except possibly the ability of federal agencies to get themselves mired in bureaucracy.

Tens of thousands of people have worked for NASA in all capacities, and :engineer" covers a wide range. If this person has something new to add, and can back up what he says, more power to him. Otherwise, it's like putting a fresh coat of varnish on the manure pile.
 
WildCat said:
Ever wonder why all these truther experts never show up here, and leave people like atavisms and RedIbis who can't argue anything to convince all of us sheeple?
Click to expand...

Now now, we have Heiwa.

:p
 
I'll bet Mackie is cuter, and the halo effect means he's right. That and all the math stuff.
 
Edx said:
I doubt it since everything he says is just well worn truther statements which is why he repeated the exact claim by David Ray Griffin which is that the 911 Commission Report didnt even mention Building 7.
Click to expand...

Wrong. On pg. 32 of his book, Omissions and Distortions Griffin clearly criticizes The Commission for "its failure to even mention the collapse of Building 7".

My italics.
 
T.A.M. said:
If believes the nonsense that Griffin and Gage produce, I would have to say...yes, or if not a loon and a twoofie, then extremely gullible, or so blinded by hate for the USG or the Bush admin, that he has failed to let rationality and science lead him.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Right, because it couldn't possibly be skepticism.
 
RedIbis said:
Wrong. On pg. 32 of his book, Omissions and Distortions Griffin clearly criticizes The Commission for "its failure to even mention the collapse of Building 7".

My italics.
Click to expand...

Kinda funny that DRG was honest enough to name his book omissions and distortions, when he must have known that the record before the Commission showed quite clearly that the building had collapsed.

Anyway, however, this thread is about how your newest bestest hero lied, not DRG.
 
RedIbis said:
Wrong. On pg. 32 of his book, Omissions and Distortions Griffin clearly criticizes The Commission for "its failure to even mention the collapse of Building 7".

My italics.
Click to expand...
On what page of what paper does your newest hero Deets support any of his claims for OMGINSIDEJOBBYJOB!!1!1?
 
Being an engineer doesn't mean you can't go nuts. Look at Morgan Reynolds. He was a farking Cabinet member, and he went totally off the deep end. I suspect that this guy might fall into the same category. He's certainly not applying any critical thinking to what he's spouting.
 
RedIbis said:
Right, because it couldn't possibly be skepticism.
Click to expand...

Exactly correct. Because intelligent skepticism is based in rational thought, and not the rank stupidity of asking why a report about a terrorist attack failed to mention a building not attacked by terrorists, or promoting the notion that three skyscrapers were blown up in Lower Manhattan without anyone noticing.
 
RedIbis said:
Wrong. On pg. 32 of his book, Omissions and Distortions Griffin clearly criticizes The Commission for "its failure to even mention the collapse of Building 7".
Click to expand...

And Griffin knows full well why it wasn't mentioned. As do you.

So why does your NASA hero make it sound as if it's somehow sinister?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom