Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL. bs thinks he's going to trap you into something. What exactly, I have no idea. But he clearly isn't smart enough to trick anybody.
No tricks dtugg. THis is the original footage. I just want to be sure that there will be no going back on that. Always close the gates first.
 
What the hell exactly is your point? Let me guess ... the footage proves inside jobby job. In twoofer fantasyland, everything does.
 
That's a possibiity.
Have you considered that it is not theirs to archive? In other words they aired a video clip (under agreement) that was not owned by Fox (?). Happens all the time you know.

I see no reason to doubt they showed it on 9/11.
 
Last edited:
Have you considered that it is not theirs to archive? In other words they aired a video clip (under agreement) that was not owned by Fox (?). Happens all the time you know.

I see no reason to doubt they showed it on 9/11.

Listen to the whole video. The FOX cameraman in the FOX chopper agrees that he shot the footage. That makes it Foxs' live 9/11 footage.
 
Last edited:
LOL!!!! That's what you're going on about? That some Fox affiliate is (apparently) missing some footage? Couldn't be more pathetic. Literally.
 
No it doesn't. Local stations routinely hire subcontractor to do these things. What's your point?

I am waiting for an answer from our sworn-to-be-honest friend. Perhaps the permission has come through.
 
I am waiting for an answer from our sworn-to-be-honest friend. Perhaps the permission has come through.
Whatever.
I have a friend that flew a news helicopter. There was a couple remote cameras and one reporter on board. The one reporter was for traffic for three or four different TV and radio stations. He was told where to fly by his boss that was independent from all the stations.

So, What makes you think Fox actually owns the footage.
 
Whatever.
I have a friend that flew a news helicopter. There was a couple remote cameras and one reporter on board. The one reporter was for traffic for three or four different TV and radio stations. He was told where to fly by his boss that was independent from all the stations.

So, What makes you think Fox actually owns the footage.

What makes you think they don't ?

This is as mealy-mouthed as your acceptance that the nose in - nose out footage is the authentic video record of the day.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, how this started. I asked Bill to stop trolling on the thread quoted below.

That's it with you, you never argue specifics. You deal in generalisations, speculation and bad "facts". For instance your failure to condemn the "vicsims" drivel. It just adds to your troll CV.

Show me a post you've made, where you stated some thing specific about 9/11 events. We'll use the General Discussion thread as you request. Don't want to derail this thread any further.

Please, try and find something that hasn't been thoroughly debunked here already. That is, I really don't want to waste my time on nonsense like "pull it" "freefall" "thermite, thermate, super nanothermite" "DEW" etc etc.

Please bring something new to the table, something we can all have a good honest debate about.

Compus


As you can see. I asked for specificity, quality and honesty.

Bill why, already, do you have to snipe?


Bill Smith said:
Who did you request permission from ? GCHQ ?


Bill Smith said:
I am aiting for an answer from our sworn-to-be-honest friend. Perhaps the permission has come through.


Bill Smith said:
See you on the General Discussion thread shortly. I will be watching carefully for when you begin to obfuscate.


Can't you resist your trollish habits for just one moment?

Compus

PS
Gimme 10 minutes. I'll address your nose through the tower post soon. I'm halfway through Sunday dinner.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, how this started. I asked Bill to stop trolling on the thread quoted below.




As you can see. I asked for specificity, quality and honesty.

Bill why, already, do you have to snipe?











Can't you resist your trollish habits for just one moment?

Compus

PS
Gimme 10 minutes. I'll address your nose through the tower post soon. I'm halfway through Sunday dinner.

Bon apetit. i have to pop out myself.
 
What makes you think they don't ?.

Do you actually read what people post? It's routine for stations to sub-contract this sort of thing.

This is as mealy-mouthed as yoor acceptance that the nose in - nose out footage is the authentic video record of the day.

What does this mean?:boggled: I said I have no reason to doubt it real. How certain do you think I can be? I didn't watch Fox that day.

Besides, What's your point? That Fox is "in on it"? What difference does it make? According to "truthers" everyone is.
 
Last edited:
Do you actually read what people post? It's routine for stations to sub-contract this sort of thing.



What does this mean?:boggled: I said I have no reason to doubt it real. How certain do you think I can be? I didn't watch Fox that day.

Besides, What's your point? That Fox is "in on it"? What difference does it make? According to "truthers" everyone is.

You don't need to be so defensive.
 
Okay. To start off here is a video that shows the nose of the plane that hit WTC2 apparently going through the building. Some people say that it was only debris. The only point I want to make with this video is that the actual shot of the nose/debris going through the building is the original authentic footage as seen on 9/11. I know this to be so because I remember seeing it myself on 9/11. A few posters here have confirmed it too. I need to lock this down before laying out the case. This is where your honesty comes into the spotlight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE
Do you agree that this is the original footage ? Check Google if you have to.



OK. So the only question is "Is this the original footage?"

I can't state whether it is with utmost certainty. I haven't checked it out. Do you think it's original? It does "look" legit to me.


Compus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom