• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brainster Versus Dylan Avery Debate September 10, 2009

KJC said:
This was a poor debate. Too much time was spent on the chain of custody argument which really lets Avery off with having to explain how this stuff could have demolished the towers in the first place.
Click to expand...

I think if what a proper chain of custody is was explained, that part of the debate would have worked out a lot more.

I don't know if it was bad though, just weird. Avery telling Pat that he should go and do the research was just bizarre...
 
WUBRINY63 said:
That's right Pat. Someone collecting WTC dust they think came from the WTC off a bridge where they think it landed and putting it in a plastic bag is not a chain of custody according to debunkers. They should have documented the fact that they had scooped it up with a backhoe from the WTC collapse site, thrown it in a dump truck with a bunch of other scooped up crap properly identified WTC debris, carted it across town, bring it to the dump landfill site designated as a crime scene for the purposes of analysis and drop it with the rest of the garbage identified debris from the WTC down at the dump analysis site, and then try to find it and bag it. Then and only then will you have have debunker approved a properly defined chain of custody.
Click to expand...

There were one or two errors in WUBRINY63's post, but it turned out to make perfect sense once I'd fixed them.

Dave
 
Last edited:
WUBRINY63 said:
Oh now their on to the one of the PNAC authors as if this sycophant nobody and his identity is significant. It was the signers that agreed with the statement that were later part of the Bush administration and the push for war using 9/11 as an excuse. Does someone not understand this?
Click to expand...

Have you ever bothered to READ the PNAC document? The "new pearl harbor?" Have you?

It is about updating the communications equipment for the military. doh. So are you now suggesting that the bush administration used the rube goldberg (damn dem jooooooz) conspiracy machine in order to get new walkie talkies for the army? Really?

I love it when the whole reading for comprehension thing is important. Not just datamining quotes sockie.
 
Somebody called in to the show and said (or perhaps it was brainster) that several scientists have examined and debunked Jones paper. Is this true? If so could someone tell me the names of the scientists so I can read up?
 
Just finished listening to it. While i'm not a big fan of Dylan Avery, if i would have been in his position and managed to click together the first viral internet video - i would have moved after the first million hits. Now, lack of empathy is a clear sign of pathological disorders and that may be an accuse for many of you, but i hope Mr. Curley ends up where he belongs - in jail.
 
liverleef said:
Somebody called in to the show and said (or perhaps it was brainster) that several scientists have examined and debunked Jones paper. Is this true? If so could someone tell me the names of the scientists so I can read up?
Click to expand...


that was alienentity. The scientists are from Norway, that's all I can say.


I re-listened to this yesterday and I love how Avery started off a few of his responses like, "Well first, .... and then B ...." I think in an outline the proper way to go is Roman numerals, capitalized letters and then numbers, right?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Just finished listening to it. While i'm not a big fan of Dylan Avery, if i would have been in his position and managed to click together the first viral internet video - i would have moved after the first million hits. Now, lack of empathy is a clear sign of pathological disorders and that may be an accuse for many of you, but i hope Mr. Curley ends up where he belongs - in jail.
Click to expand...


WTF? what do you mean lack of empathy is a clear sign of pathological disorders.. and why direct this at at Brainster? ITS CLEAR that its dYLAN during the last 8 years who has shown lack of empathy. HE over the last 8 years, accused the Bernard Brown of putting his SON aboard Flight 77, knowing that it was going to CRASH. Dont even get us started on his lack of empathy of the victims by calling them "secondary".


but you know what, lack of empathy doesn't show "a clear sign of pathological disorders" . so stop pulling that crap from where the sun dont shine. and no one goes to "jail" for pathological disorders. In this country, you have every right to be clearly insane, as its not a criminal condition
 
Hey guys is there a link to the debate? I've been through the thread but if there's a link I must have missed it.

I visited both am770chqr.com and noliesradio.org without luck.
 
Nice job, brainster. Changing the subject and avoiding the question is a lot more obvious on live radio than it is online. I wish these guys did more interviews; it might put this whole nonsense to bed more quickly.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Just finished listening to it. While i'm not a big fan of Dylan Avery, if i would have been in his position and managed to click together the first viral internet video - i would have moved after the first million hits. Now, lack of empathy is a clear sign of pathological disorders and that may be an accuse for many of you, but i hope Mr. Curley ends up where he belongs - in jail.
Click to expand...

If there is a sequitur hidden somewhere in this post, I am unable to devine it.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Just finished listening to it. While i'm not a big fan of Dylan Avery, if i would have been in his position and managed to click together the first viral internet video - i would have moved after the first million hits. Now, lack of empathy is a clear sign of pathological disorders and that may be an accuse for many of you, but i hope Mr. Curley ends up where he belongs - in jail.
Click to expand...

Well, that's an improvement over Kevin Barrett's fantasy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom