Brainster Versus Dylan Avery Debate September 10, 2009

[TexasJack]

Now I'm at the part where Breckenridge tries to use Greening to Debunk Jones. Classic. Breckenridge should come here and see how Greening was treated by the debunkers. And how exactly Greening thought about the debunkers here.

Really? Were you here when Greening was here? LOL

 

[WUBRINY63]

Sounds like Pats debunking of the dust collected has it's own conspiracy theroy. Either that or some insane coincidence which isn't surprising coming from a debunker. Are you kidding me?

 

[WUBRINY63]

The chain of custody? Yeah that's what we want to know about parts of your story Pat. In fact where is the custody of most of it at all never mind the chain? This whole thing is nonsense.

 

[WUBRINY63]

Why don't you get off your arse and file FOIA requests and tell us what your hard work produces? Why so lazy?

Because I can't read through black magic marker?

 

[DGM]

Because I can't read through black magic marker?

So you have filed FOIA requests. I'm sorry I doubted you. Would you mind posting these "blacked out" papers? Or are you just assuming that's what you'll get?

 

[WUBRINY63]

Oh now their on to the one of the PNAC authors as if this sycophant nobody and his identity is significant. It was the signers that agreed with the statement that were later part of the Bush administration and the push for war using 9/11 as an excuse. Does someone not understand this?

 

[DGM]

Oh now their on to the one of the PNAC authors as if this sycophant nobody and his identity is significant. It was the signers that agreed with the statement that were later part of the Bush administration and the push for war using 9/11 as an excuse. Does someone not understand this?

In English, plaease.

 

[WUBRINY63]

So you have filed FOIA requests. I'm sorry I doubted you. Would you mind posting these "blacked out" papers? Or are you just assuming that's what you'll get?

Just buy a black magic marker, draw some lines with "The" and "it." for bookends and you'll be all set.

 

[DGM]

Just buy a black magic marker, draw some lines with "The" and "it." for bookends and you'll be all set.

So your pulling this all out of your arse. Why comment on something you have no clue about? Do you really think the FBI is "in on it" too? Is everyone "in on it" (except you of course)?

 

[WUBRINY63]

Wow. Pat is criticizing the evidence collecting techniques of Steven Jones. I guess Professor Jones isn't Scoop and Dump savvy Pat.

 

[WUBRINY63]

This is hilarious. Pat goes on and on about chain of custody only to point out in the end that the WTC evidence was sifted and searched for down at the dump not at the crime scene.

 

[WUBRINY63]

I think what Dylan meant about the steel and the Nist report was that I believe NIST claimed no pieces were recovered from the impact zone on the towers. I could be wrong. It's been awhile.

 

[DGM]

This is hilarious. Pat goes on and on about chain of custody only to point out in the end that the WTC evidence was sifted and searched for down at the dump not at the crime scene.

And your point?

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Awesome. I can't believe we didn't think of freight elevators. Those would run from the top down to the basement.

Thanks a bunch, Foolmewunz!

Here's a better picture, from Wikipedia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Design_with_Floor_and_Elevator_Arrangment.svg

Or the JPG version if you can't view the above.

 

[WUBRINY63]

That's right Pat. Someone collecting WTC dust off a bridge where it landed and putting it in a plastic bag is not a chain of custody according to debunkers. They should have scooped it up with a backhoe, thrown it in a dump truck with a bunch of other scooped up crap, carted it across town, bring it to the dump and drop it with the rest of the garbage down at the dump, and then try to find it and bag it. Then and only then will you have have debunker approved chain of custody.

 

[WUBRINY63]

Who is the 12 year old asking about KSM? So what? Did all we need to do was pick any terrorist who bragged about possibly being part of 9/11 and that's enough? Truthers don't need to do anything to try and set free KSM. The Government needs to charge him with something and get a conviction. That's it. What are debunkers doing to get that conviction? Certainly not finding any hard evidence he was involved with 9/11. Next.

 

[T.A.M.]

Now I'm at the part where Breckenridge tries to use Greening to Debunk Jones. Classic. Breckenridge should come here and see how Greening was treated by the debunkers. And how exactly Greening thought about the debunkers here.

Wow that is interesting. So you were lurking that long ago, and only joined a couple of months ago eh?

Give it up Sock.

TAM

 

[TokenMac]

Who is the 12 year old asking about KSM? So what? Did all we need to do was pick any terrorist who bragged about possibly being part of 9/11 and that's enough? Truthers don't need to do anything to try and set free KSM. The Government needs to charge him with something and get a conviction. That's it. What are debunkers doing to get that conviction? Certainly not finding any hard evidence he was involved with 9/11. Next.

You are a sick sick person.

 

[WUBRINY63]

Wow. Now there is a whole tag team of debunkers trying to get Dylan on something involving the FDNY that they can't seem to prove he even claimed. So they bring up Alex Jones and Bermus. Does Dylan even need to be there?

Hey Pat, do you ever go one on one? Or do you and your tough guy friends just jump people only to still get your butts kicked? I mean if you're going to get your butt kicked anyway why not go down honorably instead of just lamely trying to save face after the fact amongst your friends here? At least then you could say it was one on one. Most of the time you're not even talking on this.

 

[TexasJack]

Did all we need to do was pick any terrorist who bragged about possibly being part of 9/11 and that's enough?

No, but can you name any other terrorists that are bragging about it besides your buddies KSM and OBL?