• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Dylan Avery WRIF interview about Nat Geo 9/11 Special

WUBRINY63 said:
<snip>

You don't speak for all 9/11 families and victims. In fact you can't even backup most of the claims that come out of your mouth.
Click to expand...

Another brave internet warrior, hiding behind a computer monitor.

I believe Tri has already posted an invitation to another big-mouthed miscreant to visit Station 10 with him on 9/11 this year. Would you like to go down and explain to The Bravest how you speak for their brothers and brothers' families?
 
knife fight colobus said:
Dylan is speaking at a Truther rally in LA on 9/11. I look forward to asking him about all the errors he made in his claims in this interview.


This was pretty much two of the Zoo Crew (ring the cowbell really loud) ganging up on an idiot for 45 minutes. Dylan did not handle himself well but I also kind of couldn't blame him, those guys get under people's skin for a living.

It was still great because people like Dylan need to get knocked off their high horse.
Click to expand...

Hey KFC. Ask him if he regrets his comments about Bernard Brown and his son. Ask him how he can say the vile things about people who lost loved ones and if he has ever apologized to them.
 
orphia nay said:
:) Agreed. Welcome to the forum! :welcome4

Have you been watching the antics of the twoof movement for long? Did you ever believe any of their theories?
Click to expand...


I've been watching the antics for a long time, and never, ever believed one jot of it. I cannot think of any one claim the "Truth" movement has proven. I wont hold my breath either.

As for the kitty litter isn't kitty house-trained yet? Whats going on at HQ?

Compus
 
It's a shock to go from minimum wage or slightly above to an upper 5-figure income.

Would you want to go back to making a nickel an hour after having lived the good life?

Interviewer: "What are you doing for a job these days?"

Avery: "I'm making pizzas."

Interviewer: "Really? You shocked the world with your Loose Change videos and brought the US power structure to its knees. Do you mean to tell me that you work in a fast food restaurant?"

Avery: "Yes. Would you like one topping or two?
 
triforcharity said:
Not really chump.
So, the next time someone decides to break into my car, I should demand that the police for my area be fired because they didn't stop the break-in?? This is just too dumb for words.
Click to expand...


WUBRINY63 said:
No but if there was someone specifically hired to protect your car from being broken into then yes they would be responsible to some degree. In fact if the knew they wouldn't be held responsible for not doing their job they might as well rob your car themselves. Especially if you gave them the keys.
Click to expand...


The car wasn't robbed, it was smashed up and set on fire. The car protectors paid compensation and replaced the car, what would be the motive? They did what they could but the smasher-uppers were determined, they only needed sledgehammer, some petrol and a Zippo. Multiple witnesses watched them commit the crime and they left evidence like confetti all over the shop. Then, to cap it off, they went on Jerry ****ing Springer and bragged about it FFS.

You can't even get a simple analogy straight.

Compus
 
WUBRINY63 said:
So is it back to OBL for debunkers now? Because I thought it was KSM these days. Will it be KFC next week?
Click to expand...

So let's get this straight: you're proposing a conspiracy that would require tens of thousands of conspirators, and at the same time you're complaining that the actual attacks couldn't possibly have required as many as two?

Dave
 
knife fight colobus said:
I relistened to this interview (I don't recommend it) so I could find some good material to form a question out of if there is a Q&A.

This question is in the top 3 possible questions I plan on asking for sure.

I'm interested in his claim that the victim's families are still calling for an investigation because IMO, that is the best argument he throws at people and I don't know enough info about it to tell whether or not those claims hold any validity.
Click to expand...

It would also be interesting to learn what he's been doing for income for the last 2 years....tie that right into how much he's made off of LC, LC2, LCFC, etc.

There's an interesting quote from Dylan here, in which he states in no uncertain terms that Final Cut was the end of the Loose Change saga. He says he's done making 9/11 films. I'd be interested to know why he did a complete 180.

My guess would be financial reasons....Dylan probably thought the LC thing was over. Then somehow he was offered a distribution deal. The only way to have an exclusive distribution deal would be if it was different than what's been previously released, so he had to re-make it. Of course, being who he is, Dylan would never admit this so I would expect some type of evasive answer, probably pandering to the unnamed victims which he claims to support.
 
Last edited:
nicepants said:
There's an interesting quote from Dylan here, in which he states in no uncertain terms that Final Cut was the end of the Loose Change saga. I haven't been able to find the original source for this quote but if you could locate that, it would be worth asking him why he had such a drastic change of heart.
Click to expand...

I provided it in this post.
 
dtugg said:
I provided it in this post.
Click to expand...

Thanks :) Google didn't have it cached until today.

I took the liberty of downloading a copy of that video just in case it manages to disappear like every other web page on which Dylan said final cut was the end of the LC films.
 
triforcharity said:
So, its the governments fault 100% that this happened?? Not really chump.

So, the next time someone decides to break into my car, I should demand that the police for my area be fired because they didn't stop the break-in?? This is just too dumb for words.
Click to expand...

I tried this once, when I was younger.

My car was broken into right in front of my house, and my radio and cell phone were stolen. The perpetrator left sunglasses, a half pack of Newports, a screwdriver, and a (mostly) empty bag of Arby's in my car. I called the police the following morning to report it, and to tell them about all the evidence he left behind. Apparently, I had been watching far too much CSI because I was under the impression that they would be down there to take fingerprints and such.

When the officer seemed to be wrapping up the conversation (Again, thank you for calling the Kansas City Police Department . . .) I asked if or when I could expect an officer to arrive to check it out. They laughed at me and informed me that it would be substantially less expensive for the KCPD to simply replace my items when compared to a forensic analysis.

I told them that sounded fair, gave them the make and model of my stereo and phone, and repeated my name and address, so that they could make arrangements.


The next morning I had a parking ticket.
 
WUBRINY63 said:
No one has been even 1% held accountable for not doing their job on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Who should have been held accountable?? If we held every person accountable, we would have of fired nearly 1,000,0000 . While I will agree that some things shouldn't have been an issue, like sharing information between agencies. Now, if you notice, this has been one of the things that the 9/11 Comission addressed at length. It also has been implemented.

WUBRINY63 said:
No but if there was someone specifically hired to protect your car from being broken into then yes they would be responsible to some degree. In fact if the knew they wouldn't be held responsible for not doing their job they might as well rob your car themselves. Especially if you gave them the keys.
Click to expand...

No, they would not, because they cannot be everywhere all the time, but good job over-analizing it.

WUBRINY63 said:
What has been done to stop another 9/11 like attack or worse?
Click to expand...
Like, no more knifes on planes? More stringent inspections at security checkpoints in airports? Inter-agency information sharing?? You mean, like those??


WUBRINY63 said:
Bull. Investigators have already breached security post 9/11 with fake bombs that could be used to hijack a plane much like what is claimed to have happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

They used BOMBS on the planes?? I thought they used knifes?? Yeah, thought so. BTW, are you talking about the small IED that some UCs smuggled into some federal buildings?? Yeah, we have discussed that to death before. If not, will you please provide a link?? Thanks.

WUBRINY63 said:
You don't speak for all 9/11 families and victims. In fact you can't even backup most of the claims that come out of your mouth.
Click to expand...

REally?? Like what?? Please quote me in your responses. And I have NEVER claimed to speak for ALL the survivors, but, me being one, I do have some opinion, and my opinion is your little movement is the most detestable bunch of people on the face of the planet, and most others will agree.
 
Hey Tri.

We have already discussed the IED thing with this sock puppet of HI. He knows it, we know it.

Next he will try bringing up the shut off transponders, or the 11 distress calls over the atlantic... don't worry... he'll get banned soon enough.
 
One could only hope.

HI was preticularly fun to poke with sticks. Some of the BS that he spewed was rather amusing. Especially the HE in Fed buildings thing, that was fun.

But, on a more serious note, these scumbags who try to use MY name to appeal to emotion is sickening. I always find it funny that thei NYCCAAN('T) petition could ONLY get ONE survivor to stand up with them. Out of HOW MANY?? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom