• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie Nominations

9/11 Investigator makes another attempt at a Stundie with his favorite 'The Jews Are Out To Take Over" rant:

You don't really know where to begin, but Roosevelt was NOT a Jew is as good a place as any.

Our support of the Bolsheviks, huh. I guess if one has already decided to deny the Holocaust, denying our support of White Russian forces in the Russian Civil War is a fairly small bit of revisionism... :boggled:
 
There's a race on to jump the shark right now, but Heiwa has beaten NWO Kitty by a comfortable margin.

But are you really sure that the momentum of the bicyclist was transferred to the Earth affecting its momentum? Maybe the momentum became heat - global warming, you know?

Heiwa, the self-proclaimed expert on damage analysis, doesn't even know the difference between energy and momentum. That's a high school physics fail.

Dave
 
Well, I don't mind a jewish take-over as long as we get the New York Pastrami-on-Rye division sent to take control of Sweden... :P

Damnit, now I need to go make myself a sandwich.
 
And 9/11 Investigator is back on how the Euros will invade the US to save their white Brethren kick:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148049&page=27

and Precisely:

it's easy to imagine that the euro-americans are going to need a lot of help from their european pals in the future. Who would have thought that americans would land in normandie in 1944? Who can imagine that european troops someday will go ashore in florida?

Gee.And I thought that paratroopers in Colorado would open the Invasion....
 
Who would have thought that americans would land in normandie in 1944?


Gee, maybe anyone who paid attention during WWI? Or anyone who noticed the Canadians wandering about England from 1939-1941?
 
And 9/11 Investigator is back on how the Euros will invade the US to save their white Brethren kick:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148049&page=27

and Precisely:



Gee.And I thought that paratroopers in Colorado would open the Invasion....

No, it's the Cubans that will be landing in Colorado. They will be part of the second wave attempting to steal back the parts of Hispanic culture that our corporate interests have almost totally destroyed.
 
Heiwa is getting further and further from reality.

The reaction force is applied on part C by part A. That reaction force does nothing to part A (as A applies it on C). It only affects part C as per Newton 3.

Only Heiwa could cite Newton's Third Law as proof of a violation of Newton's Third Law.

Dave
 
JoanEdwards2 said:
ROTFL, KHOD! How is it I've been cooking for decades on a gas stove and NOTHING, no pots or pans, bakeware, oven racks or broiler pans, have ever "WEAKENED" from the INTENSE heat? And it got pretty intensely hot in my kitchen when I used to cook family Thanksgiving dinners. I've experienced no STRUCTURAL FAILURE in my kitchen due to INTENSE HEAT--ever.

I've long advocated some accurate scale models of the Twin Towers be constructed and aluminum airplanes, loaded with kerosene or jet fuel, be shot at the Towers at 500 MPH, and see what happens. I can picture it now. The plane will smash up and fall to the ground, sputtering. The building will remain intact--maybe a few windows and outside perimeter columns will be bent, but nothing more. Then, I'd like to see some jet fuel poured on the model and see it it flows down the elevator shaft and explodes in the lobby.

http://messageboards.aol.com/aol/en_us/articles.php?boardId=564809&articleId=48947&func=5&channel=

There are no words.
 
Very good. Two books. Technical. And you read them. I believe you.

Evidently dropping a weight from above that hits something below may produce local failures. I have seen it multiple times. Honestly!

BUT, that a little piece of a structure high up in it dropping down may produce total destruction of the complete structure below is simply not possible. I have explained it in other famous JREF threads, which pls consult.

He forgot some experiments...
 
It's not a CT, and you have to have some familiarity with quantum mechanics, but this ...

You cannot have a real spin, because for a pointlike object to rotate back to their original orientations would require to make
latex.php
, so it would need to spin twice as fast, meaning it would also have to spin faster than the speed of light, which is currently not allowed.

I can't even count the number of fails Singularitarian has in that thread, but "currently not allowed" is certainly the funniest.
 
I hear that due to the housing bubble, Congress is willing to reconsider the regulations on the universal speed limit. I myself think that's populistic liberal hippie pandering.
 
I hear that due to the housing bubble, Congress is willing to reconsider the regulations on the universal speed limit. I myself think that's populistic liberal hippie pandering.

Everyone knows the speed limit of light kills more people than it saves.
 
Since he came in here degrading me, i creamed his ass people.

He obviously thought i was making this stuff up.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151197

I have no problem letting the readers decide for themselves who got creamed.

So I nominate Mr.D for a stundie based on this post in which he obviously thinks Singularitarian is making "this stuff" up.

Even if that's what you meant, it still makes no sense in the context of Dorfl's post regarding interpreting the spin of a particle as the classical angular momentum of a rotating three-dimensional object.
 

Back
Top Bottom