• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Encountered my first "Truther" today

Thank you gravy.

No, I would turn down a made for TV movie, as I do not want fame. All I wanna do is help, that is it. Plus, I can't stand my own kids, why would I adopt more??

J/k, I absoluetly love my children.

Red,

Care to explain why you lied about my story being a proven lie?? I would LOVE to see this ................

These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:

Now, he is being charged with a felony, and a misdemeanor. He is still in jail under no bail, as the judge deamed him a threat to the community. So, they gave him no bond.

to this:

They will be filing charges for the following charges, due to my opinion on the case.

Obstructing the flow of traffic
Harassment of a LEO/Firefighter/EMT
 
Why do I have an image of this resulting in a TV movie based on the life of triforcharity and his brood of 12 ex-truther adoptees?

"Ladder Eight is Enough?"


anyway, good on you. I've said before, most Truthers just plain need help. I only with I knew how to help them.
 
These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:

Now, he is being charged with a felony, and a misdemeanor. He is still in jail under no bail, as the judge deamed him a threat to the community. So, they gave him no bond.

to this:

They will be filing charges for the following charges, due to my opinion on the case.

Obstructing the flow of traffic
Harassment of a LEO/Firefighter/EMT

Why is that suspicious in your opinion?

Charges get reduced all the time, for a variety of reasons.
 
These are both misdemeanors, as I urged them to reduce his charges to that level. I did not want to see a VERY stupid misstake ruining this kids whole entire life. A felony would do exactly that.


Who did you speak with about reducing the charges? Not looking for names, just their title/position.
 
These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:



to this:

None of that changes the fact that you told a demonstrable lie.
 
Who did you speak with about reducing the charges? Not looking for names, just their title/position.

The very first sentence from the post you quoted:
I spoke to the SAO today regarding this case.


I know you're all excited to play debunker-buster super sleuth, but sometimes the case-cracker can be found by simply reading the information already provided.
 
Why is that suspicious in your opinion?

Charges get reduced all the time, for a variety of reasons.
Remember Red has no idea what reality is. You know where first time offenses get slaps on the wrist; and non-violent acts usually gets the offender on a probation type of status; and community service or the like would be issued.

aS stated by Tri - the kid had no record to speak of (meaning he either never got caught in doing any of the stuff he did that was criminal, or he just never did any criminal act).

But good on Tri to step in and give his opinion. WHy should he continue to make this kid's already troubled life, more trouble that it needed?
 
When you post something as fact, and it is proven without a shadow of a doubt to be a lie, it is best to retract that statement. It is the honorable thing to do.

Red Ibis does not know what honorable is.

He slanders people with impunity. A particularly nasty type of liar.
 
These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:

no new details will make anyone reading this thread think that you arent a liar
RETRACT YOUR STATEMENT

unless you enjoy digging holes
 
No flaming please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who did you speak with about reducing the charges? Not looking for names, just their title/position.

That would be the state prosecutor for the State's Attorney's Office.

Who else would I talk to?? Maybe Fidel Castro?? Or maybe Alex Jones?? Come on, don't be dumb.
 
These new details are really touching, but you haven't proven anything. In fact I find this getting more bizarre as time goes on. You went from this:



to this:


You seem to be having trouble understanding a very straightforward question several people have put to you. You wrote that Tri's story was exposed as a fabrication. In reality, nothing of the sort happened. You are now reduced to claiming that it hasn't been proved beyond doubt. But, let us agree that your new position is far from your old one. Your original statement qualifies as a lie in that it is a) untrue, and b) was known by you to be untrue when you made it.
What is stopping you from offering an overdue apology?
 

Back
Top Bottom