Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know that flour factory in Turkey that they tried to demolish recently, but it failed miserably because they didn't use ultramegananotherm*te? You know, this one?


I was waiting for some truther, somewhere, one way or another, to cite it in re their inside jobby job fantasy. Well, I don't have to wait any more.
reddit twoofer said:
here is a good example of what buildings really do when they fall over.....like you might expect one to do if there was some severe damage to it.
Click to expand...

Yes, the WTC buildings should have toppled over at the points of impact and rolled onto their roofs. :mgduh

Bonus from the always intelligent discourse of the youtube comment section of the above video...
youtube twoofer said:
Wonder if column 79 caused this?
Click to expand...

edit: I should have known infowars would be all over this bombshell.
http://www.infowars.com/more-proof-against-wtc-7-lies/
 
Last edited:
eromitlab said:
edit: I should have known infowars would be all over this bombshell.
http://www.infowars.com/more-proof-against-wtc-7-lies/
Click to expand...
Just a random add-on from reading the link, I read this response to it with amazement... while not a spectacular display of rationality this is probably to least stupid thing I've personally ever read anywhere on infowars:

Although I’m with truthers the unfortunate fact is until the exact thing happens (including plane impacts and fire) to a very similar building which EASILY SURVIVES this is not USEFUL ‘evidence’…Not even the Beijing hotel fire. I do believe we were not told the whole truth nor will we ever be. False flag attacks have occured and 9/11 fits the MO. That is all I can say for sure.
Click to expand...

How many bets that the article author's will remove it at some point?
 
bill smith said:
You should listen. Greening has things to say about both sides. One thing I can say is that I'm really glad I liistened to the interview because now I believe that Greening might be clean...though he did co-author one of he Bazant papers.
Click to expand...


You believe Greening when he refutes your explosives moonshine? Why not?

So, if Greening, who rejects your insane movement's bogus science, is "clean," are you saying that the real engineers and physicists who post here are "dirty"? Be more specific.
 
BigAl said:
Franklin thinks Gage is nuts and says so at length. Start listening at 9:00 minutes.

Franklin is a minor player on national radio. While you crow about this one 10 minute spot heard by a few people, The Birthers and the Tea Baggers are on mainstream TV, nationwide.
Click to expand...

Drip drip drip....
 
You may return to your coma. already in progress bill

bill smith said:
A biography of Judy Woods. She seems to be the singlemost technically qualified researcher of them all.
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/bio/Wood_Bio.html
Click to expand...


your an effin riot BS

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=495285&page=2

Like others said, she had good intentions and when she wasn't trying to convince us Bush blew up the WTC she was actually nice, but she wasn't a great teacher. Too many times she starts examples and doesn't finish them. And yes, she was in a coma for 6 years. How crazy is that.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Hey fellas, maybe I'm missing some context here, but like I said, if we're comparing Judy Wood against other truther researchers, then she may very well be the single most technically qualified among them. And as I said earlier, that's exactly the whole problem with the "Truth" movement: That she is the "most qualified". The gal who believes that space weapons brought down the towers, to the point of filing a lawsuit to prove it.
 
A W Smith said:
your an effin riot BS

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=495285&page=2
Click to expand...
a funny thing. I wrote the following post yesterday.

'' Well for the reasons I gave in the post you reference I find it impossible to believe that the fragile delicate aircraft negotiated those massive obstacles by way of bludgeoning it's way tthrough. But at the time time I also find it hard to believe that the perps would NOT have used real planes and resorted to the use of holograms or injected images of planes. That just seems too cmplicated and vulnerable to errors. (even though there is considerable evidence to support the injected images of planes)

So to square this circle you have to start thinking in other directions. The crumbling core columns spring to mind as a possible area of conjecture.''

I wonder........
 
bill smith said:
a funny thing. I wrote the following post yesterday.

'' Well for the reasons I gave in the post you reference I find it impossible to believe that the fragile delicate aircraft negotiated those massive obstacles by way of bludgeoning it's way tthrough. But at the time time I also find it hard to believe that the perps would NOT have used real planes and resorted to the use of holograms or injected images of planes. That just seems too cmplicated and vulnerable to errors. (even though there is considerable evidence to support the injected images of planes)

So to square this circle you have to start thinking in other directions. The crumbling core columns spring to mind as a possible area of conjecture.''

I wonder........
Click to expand...


Why would you recycle a post that was stupid even for you? There is zero evidence supporting the "injected images of planes"--who "injected" those images and for what conceivable purpose? Good grief, you are hopeless!
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
a funny thing. I wrote the following post yesterday.

'' Well for the reasons I gave in the post you reference I find it impossible to believe that the fragile delicate aircraft negotiated those massive obstacles by way of bludgeoning it's way tthrough. But at the time time I also find it hard to believe that the perps would NOT have used real planes and resorted to the use of holograms or injected images of planes. That just seems too cmplicated and vulnerable to errors. (even though there is considerable evidence to support the injected images of planes)
Click to expand...

I'm trying to figure out how the "holograms" made the roar of jet engines heard by people the length of Manhattan Island on the morning of 9/11.
 
BigAl said:
I'm trying to figure out how the "holograms" made the roar of jet engines heard by people the length of Manhattan Island on the morning of 9/11.
Click to expand...

Tut tut Al.You're doing a Dave. You removed the lines that gave my post context. That's not very nice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom