It appears that the fascist wants a united Europe, probably without the Jews, I'm guessing? Shame that was already tried. Guess who lost.
While I don't normally advocate Wikipedia as a source for academic work, I feel this page is highly informative on the nature of the
German-Soviet talks. It's exceedingly well sourced and quite in depth. Not something that gets mentioned much, especially not by the fascist here. I'll respond to the one semi-intellectual point made by him though.
Pack of lies. In Yalta it was decided that Eastern-Europa shoud remain under the Soviet sphere of influence. It was Roosevelt who de facto agreed with it, regardless of what he 'believed' or 'wanted'. In his utter naivite Uzzy deplores that the alliance between the Anglo's and the Soviets came to an end, enforcing the idea that JREF harbors mainly crypto-communists.
While my voting history would seem to counter the idea that I'm a 'crypto-communist', I suppose the fascist would consider anyone slightly to the left of Hitler as one, so it's not really an issue. No matter.
Once again the fascist gets history wrong, and misses my point. Roosevelt had always publically demanded the right of self-determination in Eastern Europe, insisting that Stalin should abide by it. Privately he may have felt differently, but when it came to the Yalta negotiations, the text said, and I quote.. "to create democratic institutions of their own choice. This is a principle of the Atlantic Charter -- the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live". Roosevelt still had faith that Stalin would come to a compromise, at the very least to look good on the international stage, and allow some sort of elections within the Eastern European nations that the Soviets currently controlled. Even Churchill felt that Stalin would keep his promises over Poland.
As it turned out, Stalin didn't keep his promises. The trial of the sixteen, and the sham elections carried out in 1947 showed that Stalin wouldn't work with the West. By that point, Stalin had de facto control over those areas, and short of provoking a full scale war, the west couldn't do anything about it. Regardless, it's one of the reasons why relations between Stalin and the West broke down after the war, which led to the Cold War.
Anyway, it's clear that you, being a fascist, can't physically understand complex history. No wonder you have to reduce every major event to 'Joo's did it!'.
By the way, here's another fascist killing weapon we Brits know how to use well. Shame we missed a few, but I think on the whole we did rather well. All the United Nations did well, by the way. Funny how fascists had very few countries under their control and found fewer friends, while liberal democracies have allies all around the world.