9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[9/11-investigator]

The war in the West was planned and approved long before any interest in Norway was present This is revisionist history -- and it is a lie.

Not before Britain declared war on Germany because Britain was so stupid to give carte blanche to the Poles regarding the Danzig issue. Very likely the Germans developed contingency plans for the case that Britain would mutate the drôle de guerre into a real one. And that's what happened when Britain started to prepare to invade Norway to push through to Sweden to cut of the German Iron supply from Giruna. Only then the Germans started to act in their characteristic ruthless way, much to the disadvantage of my country who wanted to remain neutral like in WW1. But the Germans never wanted war in the West. They had very bad memories to such a situation from WW1. And this desperate move by Hess is a perfect illustration of that fact. And it was Britain who provoked the Germans into a Blitz after repeated attacks on Germany by the RAF ordered by Churchill, the best politician Jewish money can buy, see this article:

The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London's wealthiest businessmen. Principally, businessmen organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, whose chairman was a man called Sir Bemard Waley Cohen. Sir Bernard Waley Cohen held a private dinner party at his apartment on July 29, 1936. This is in Waley Cohen's memoirs ... The 29th of July, 1936, Waley Cohen set up a slush fund of 50,000 pounds for The Focus, the Churchill pressure group. Now, 50,000 pounds in 1936, multiply that by ten, at least, to get today's figures. By another three or four to multiply that into Canadian dollars. So, 40 times 50,000 pounds -- about $2 million in Canadian terms -- was given by Bernard Waley Cohen to this secret pressure group of Churchill in July 1936. The purpose was, the tune that Churchill had to play was, fight Germany. Start warning the world about Gennany, about Nazi Germany. Churchill, of course, one of our most brilliant orators, a magnificent writer, did precisely that.

Rotterdam was an air strike with the expressed desire of inflicting casualties on civilians with the desire to force the surrender of the Netherlands.

That's true.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Where are the laughing dogs...
First: Nicolas Sarkozy is not a jew.
Second: Obama runs America since 01/20/2009.
Third: it's spelled "Kouchner"
Fourth: He was a member of the French Socialist Party and doesn't have any link with Besancenot.

1st - Baloney. He has Jewish blood and he acts accordingly, witnessed by his pro-neocon- and turning away from the classic Gaulist policies.
2nd - no kidding!
3rd - you got me there
4ft - ???

 

[Aepervius]

References please.

"A Study of the Cyanide Compounds Content in the Walls of the Gas Chambers in the Former Auschwitz and Birkenau Concentration Camps". The Institute for Forensic Research, Cracow. 2000-01-15. http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml. Retrieved on 2008-09-12.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Germany hit civilian targets first. It is that simple. The Allies responded in kind. That it was not Poles or the Dutch that carried it out matters little, but it would have invalidated your arguement in the eyes of most Nazis, I am sure.

The only reason that the Poles or the Dutch did not respond in kind was that, after the bombings, they had no real capacity to do so. The English did. It was tit-for-tat. Hitler brought it on himself.

The classic uninformed opinion after decades of brain-washing by Jewish owned media.

http://www.codoh.com/newrevoices/nrcitybomb.html

The Blitz on London in 1940 came in response to the initiation of city bombing by Britain some months earlier. Few now accept this rudimentary fact, central to Britain’s role in initiating World War II. Britons nowadays – or, all of them that I ever talk to – just see the Blitz as proof of Hitler’s wickedness and do not acknowledge the cause-and-effect connection. Winston Churchill and the War Department set up a situation where London would be blitzed, without telling the people that Britain had started the process several months earlier.

Even once-communist court historians like A.J.P. Taylor confides as much:

‘ … the almost universal belief that Hitler started the indiscriminate bombing of civilians, whereas it was started by the directors of British strategy, as some of the more honest among them have boasted.’

This is what you get when the victors start to write history: one big pack of self-serving lies. And now that the West is dying, as Buchanan puts it (with America as front runner as I kindly want to stress), it is no longer in our interest (not even in the interest of Euro-Americans) to support these lies any longer, these lies that are used to bring the Death of the West about. I know that it will hurt bleeding heart John-Boy Walton look-a-likes like leftysergeant but so be it.

 

[timhau]

1st - Baloney. He has Jewish blood and he acts accordingly

Yeah. Sarkozy's grandpa was a Jew-turned-Catholic, so he's an Untermensch with tainted blood and bent on World domination.

 

[Simon39759]

Considering the other side of his family tree was pro-Nazi Hungarian aristocrats... One would have hoped the two would have cancelled each other.

 

[dudalb]

9/11 Investigator, why do you hate the Jews so much?

 

[Uzzy]

You're right that there is no photo of Hitler and Stalin together, but that's easily explained by the fact that Hitler wouldn't want to fly over Poland et al mere days before invading. Or maybe Hitler, who was amazingly lazy, didn't really want to travel. Still, Ribbentrop and Stalin met and shook hands. Hitler and Stalin were friendly enough for Stalin to consider joining the Axis, and signed several agreements with Hitler, debating things along the lines of boundaries and commercial agreements. Up until 1941 and Operation Barbarossa, both the Nazis and the Soviets seemed happy to co-exist.

On the other hand, the Soviet-American-British relations were a wartime necessity. Nothing more, nothing less. Sadly, the divisions between them led to the Cold War, which came about due to Roosevelt's desire not to abandon the Poles and other Eastern European nations to the Soviets, due to his belief in self-determination (and possibly the fact that Poles and other Eastern European immigrants in America voted Democrat). This naturally antagonised the Soviets, who desired to keep a firm grip on those nations so that they would be, in effect, a security buffer from invasion. Russia had been invaded three times in a hundred and fifty years through Poland, after all.

Another stumbling block revolved around the future of Germany. America eventually came to the conclusion that they would have to rehabilitate Germany, so they went back on agreements that gave the Allies around about $20 Billion, mainly in heavy industry. Those agreements were changed to allowing each nation (American, Britain, France and the Soviets) to take reparations from their own zones, something the Soviets took to mean that political control could be established over their own zones, which up till then were little more then temporary militarily controlled zones.

There are many more reasons as to why the Cold War came about, deep and complex reasons that historians are still working out. Of course, these complex reasons are too much for your typical fascist knuckledragger, who unsurprisingly blame the Jews, as the fascists protobrains can't really understand politics or society. Thankfully, being British, I know what works at fighting off the fascists.

 

[I Ratant]

Thankfully, being British, I know what works at fighting off the fascists.

[qimg]http://www.wwiivehicles.com/unitedkingdom/aircraft/fighter/supermarine-spitfire/supermarine-spitfire-02.jpg[/qimg]

.
I believe these had a hand in it.. (skillfully photoshopped by yrs' trly.)
Talking to one of Lockheed's "Captured German Scientists" at work after the '71 Sylmar Earthquake, the noise of the quake was mentioned.
He said "A tausand B-17s made more noise!"

 

[9/11-investigator]

You're right that there is no photo of Hitler and Stalin together, but that's easily explained by the fact that Hitler wouldn't want to fly over Poland et al mere days before invading. Or maybe Hitler, who was amazingly lazy, didn't really want to travel. Still, Ribbentrop and Stalin met and shook hands. Hitler and Stalin were friendly enough for Stalin to consider joining the Axis, and signed several agreements with Hitler, debating things along the lines of boundaries and commercial agreements. Up until 1941 and Operation Barbarossa, both the Nazis and the Soviets seemed happy to co-exist.

Hitler hated Stalin and the communists. That's the reason. The Soviet-Union joining the Axis is a ludicrous idea, never was an issue. You say it, they seemed to happily co-exist. In reality they were both preparing for war.

On the other hand, the Soviet-American-British relations were a wartime necessity. Nothing more, nothing less.

The point Buchanan makes in 'Churchill, Hitler and the unnecessary war' is that there was no necessity for the West to come to the aide of the Soviets. What they should have done is let these two juggernauts destroy each other and maybe help a party if he should have threatened to win. But no, the 'advisors' around Churchill and Roosevelt had only Jewish interests on their mind and were hell bent on destroying that nation that had managed to escape Jewish domination.. That was the issue.

Sadly, the divisions between them led to the Cold War, which came about due to Roosevelt's desire not to abandon the Poles and other Eastern European nations to the Soviets, due to his belief in self-determination (and possibly the fact that Poles and other Eastern European immigrants in America voted Democrat).

Pack of lies. In Yalta it was decided that Eastern-Europa shoud remain under the Soviet sphere of influence. It was Roosevelt who de facto agreed with it, regardless of what he 'believed' or 'wanted'. In his utter naivite Uzzy deplores that the alliance between the Anglo's and the Soviets came to an end, enforcing the idea that JREF harbors mainly crypto-communists.

Thankfully, being British, I know what works at fighting off the fascists.

Keep dreaming of your past 'greatness' (war effort: Russia 80%, US 15%, UK 5%). The story of Britain is over.
Latest export figures:

Country - Export (population base)
--------------------------------------
1. Germany - 1500B $ (80M)
2. China - 1430B (1300M)
3. US - 1300B (400M)
4. Japan - 782B (150M)
5. Netherlands - 634B (16M)

Britain nowhere to be seen. Dream on about your spitfires.

Europe will be the new planetary powerhouse after the inevitable fall of the US and it's greenback.

Basically you are a good lad. Keep looking for these evil fascists for us while we on the continent will watch with amusement how behind your back Britain will be gradually taken over by the Muslims. Nobody will miss you.

 

[9/11-investigator]

9/11 Investigator, why do you hate the Jews so much?

Why should I like people who are hell bent on the destruction of my society?

 

[Trojan]

The Blitz on London in 1940 came in response to the initiation of city bombing by Britain some months earlier.

Here is an easy question for you investigator - which came first Rotterdam or provocation for the Blitz?

Then tell me again who started indiscriminate bombing of civilians.

 

[Simon39759]

Hmmm... You seem to be unaware that UK is actually part of Europe...

 

[Simon39759]

Here is an easy question for you investigator - which came first Rotterdam or provocation for the Blitz?

Then tell me again who started indiscriminate bombing of civilians.

What about Guernica?
The whole operation was timed purposely to cause the highest level of civilian death possible.

Explain to me how the British are actually responsible for Guernica?

 

[9/11-investigator]

Hmmm... You seem to be unaware that UK is actually part of Europe...

Since Elizabeth-I Britain has defined itself as an anti-European nation ('splendid isolation'). Now that Europe is united, despite Britain's efforts, we can now ignore Britain (and support UKIP) and kick the UK out of the Union and finally should do what General de Gaulle always advocated: l'Europe des Patries or Euro-Siberia/Boreas without Britain. We can now kiss our Anglo-friends goodbye and wish them success on their way out with their Jewish invented 'diversity is our strength' philosophy (every 2nd child born in the US is now non-European). Good luck with your new Brasil/Zimbabwe. You will probably be as strong as these fine nations. Any other opinion would be racist.

Just in case a few Euro-Americans (80%?) would feel a desire to live in a European society we can organize an admission bureau somewhere (Ellis Island comes to mind) and let everybody go back to Europe with an IQ>120.

 

[NWO Sentryman]

Since Elizabeth-I Britain has defined itself as an anti-European nation ('splendid isolation'). Now that Europe is united, despite Britain's efforts, we can now ignore Britain (and support UKIP) and kick the UK out of the Union and finally should do what General de Gaulle always advocated: l'Europe des Patries or Euro-Siberia/Boreas.

Europe? United? don't make me laugh.

Nato is still functioning, Moldova and Ukraine are on the brink fo war, switzerland and norway are still non-members.

As well as that, Russia and Turkey are not members either.

You are cearly delusional.

The UK aint gonna get kicked out.

 

[Simon39759]

Of course they are not. They are one of the economic powerhouses of the Union!

I can't wait till Turkey gets invited too. If only because it will make 9/11 cry.

 

[Twiler]

Since Elizabeth-I Britain has defined itself as an anti-European nation ('splendid isolation'). Now that Europe is united, despite Britain's efforts, we can now ignore Britain (and support UKIP) and kick the UK out of the Union and finally should do what General de Gaulle always advocated: l'Europe des Patries or Euro-Siberia/Boreas without Britain. We can now kiss our Anglo-friends goodbye and wish them success on their way out with their Jewish invented 'diversity is our strength' philosophy (every 2nd child born in the US is now non-European). Good luck with your new Brasil/Zimbabwe. You will probably be as strong as these fine nations. Any other opinion would be racist.

Just in case a few Euro-Americans would feel a desire to live in a European society we can organize an admission bureau somewhere (Ellis Island comes to mind) and let everybody go back to Europe with an IQ>120.

You're NOT a Mugabe supporter? I suppose it's harder to explain away crimes that are happening this close to the present time.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Of course they are not. They are one of the economic powerhouses of the Union!

I can't wait till Turkey gets invited too. If only because it will make 9/11 cry.

Sure, America always advocated ascension of Turkey... as a means of weakening Europe. Ain't gonna happen.

A month or so ago Merkel, Berlusconi and even Sarkozy ruled out categorically membership of Turkey. And they call the shots and not you. You are history with your 50% read ink and no industry worth mentioning and a currency that is currently being quantitatively eased into oblivion.

 

[9/11-investigator]

The UK aint gonna get kicked out.

I indeed prefer that you UKIP yourself out, less messy.

Norway? Switzerland? Maybe 10 million inhabitants on a total of 500 million Europeans already in the EU? They will join anyway sooner or later. And if not, who cares?