Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean you just do it for fun? Sucker!

*goes to polish my bathtub full of diamonds*
I let my personal assistant do that. It gives me a reason to fire up that MRI machine I won as a door prize at the NWO Festival of Bacchus. Gods, I hope those pictures never get leaked!
 
reading all of that brought me back to the stone age...................
 
Yes. All his attempts were deleted. I believe now it is six attempts...

not to further derail, but according to Darat, Ultima1 (Roger) is now threatening the JREF with legal action.

TAM:rolleyes:
 
I guess you are right, although it is not directly related to 9/11 CTs, so for that reason it might be considered a derail.

TAM:)
 
Here is the review page for DRG's latest book. There is not one single negative review. Here's one example:

"This latest book by David Ray Griffin is scholarly research at its best. Meticulous empirical investigation and painstaking analysis are combined to refute the official 9/11 narrative. Every event surrounding the tragic events of September 11, 2001, is subjected to close scrutiny, ultimately with a view to revealing the lies and upholding the truth. In this fascinating and skillfully researched exposé, Griffin demonstrates unequivocally that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job."--Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics and author of "America's War on Terrorism"

A number of the reviews use the same language and some are repeated so the whole thing looks a bit fishy to me.
 
Here is the review page for DRG's latest book. There is not one single negative review. Here's one example:



A number of the reviews use the same language and some are repeated so the whole thing looks a bit fishy to me.

Well if you go down the list of his reviewers, it is a rehash of truthers...McQueen, Ventura, Asner, McGovern, etc...

No surprises here...get your famous or semi famous followers to say something good about your new gospel.

TAM:)
 
Well if you go down the list of his reviewers, it is a rehash of truthers...McQueen, Ventura, Asner, McGovern, etc...

No surprises here...get your famous or semi famous followers to say something good about your new gospel.

TAM:)
not to mention more than half the reviews have no reference

and they are double posted

sane ppl wouldnt waste their money on that thing in order to give it a review
 
Here is the review page for DRG's latest book. There is not one single negative review. Here's one example:



A number of the reviews use the same language and some are repeated so the whole thing looks a bit fishy to me.

That's not the new book. Unless I'm mistaken, the new book is about OBL.
 
Here is the review page for DRG's latest book. There is not one single negative review. Here's one example:

A number of the reviews use the same language and some are repeated so the whole thing looks a bit fishy to me.

The whole book is a rehash. Why not rehash the reviews as well?

Vanity publication at its finest!
 
I just noticed the funny tags on this thread :D

Truth doesn't taste as good without gravy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom