• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The biblical jesus is a myth,based on older myths.

Well until you believe him you can't know him so I feel sorry for you for not believing in our very real, very alive Jesus!

The OP topic still stands that we can and do know the NT writers told the truth!
 
Last edited:
Well until you believe him you can't know him so I feel sorry for you for not believing in our very real, very alive Jesus!
Screaming "You must first believe in order to believe!!!" does not change reality. KK, do you realize how stupid this argument is?

The OP topic still stands that we can and do know the NT writers told the truth!
No. The OP has long been killed and crucified and you can't resurrected it just because you say so.
 
Well until you believe him you can't know him so I feel sorry for you for not believing in our very real, very alive Jesus!
Many people chose to leave the church and Christianity. The number of believers is falling at record rates.

Kathy, these people knew and believed in him as much if not more than you do? You know exactly why they leave. Jesus is neither alive or real. If he was it would be impossible to turn your back on him once you knew him.
 
Well until you believe him you can't know him so I feel sorry for you for not believing in our very real, very alive Jesus!
I don't need to believe in gravity to see evidence of it.
I don't need to believe in evolution to see evidence of it.
I don't need to believe in F=ma to see evidence of it.
I don't need to beleive in germ theory to see evidence of it.
I don't need to beleive in genetics to see evidence of it.
I don't need to believe in nuclear decay to see evidence of it.
I don't need to beleive in the 2nd law of thermodynamics to see evidence of it.



If your omnipotent/omniscient god is real, Why is he so much less powerful than these realities?
 
Religion is about FAITH. If you need FACTS to have FAITH, then you don't have FAITH

There are different kinds of faith. There is something called blind faith. For the most part it is impossible for an educated Christian to have blind faith since Christ and the apostles were historical people if we are to believe most historians.

And if you will notice this thread is in the history forum. We're for the most part talking cold facts in here, not faith, although I believe faith is important. Faith is also important in the belief of abiogenesis ( the belief that over time life came from non-living chemicals through non-intelligent random forces). This requires faith also because it has never been proven (just theorized).

The main theme of the book cited in post #1 of this thread is that after all the facts are examined (history, science, prophecy, etc.) it actually takes more faith to be an atheist than a Christian.
 
Last edited:
<snip> it actually takes more faith to be an atheist than a Christian.
No, No it doesn't.You know it doesn't. Several people have explained this to you several times, when you continue to repeat things that have been shown to you to be wrong it could leave people to think you are being intentionally dishonest. You don't want people to think you are a liar, do you DOC?
 
No, No it doesn't.You know it doesn't. Several people have explained this to you several times, when you continue to repeat things that have been shown to you to be wrong it could leave people to think you are being intentionally dishonest. You don't want people to think you are a liar, do you DOC?

Which of my 844 posts in this thread have been shown to be wrong and if you list any what is the evidence that it is wrong?
 
Facts? What facts? Did someone sneak a fact into that book when I wasn't looking?

So are you saying the 400+ page book "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist" cited in post #1 doesn't have any facts in it.
 
Which of my 844 posts in this thread have been shown to be wrong and if you list any what is the evidence that it is wrong?

Which of your 844 posts in this thread have been shown to be correct and if you list any what is the EVIDENCE that it is correct?
 
Because most of the threads started by intelligent reasonable people, capable of understanding an argument and either coming to an agreement, or agreeing to disagree without antagonism end up with everyone agreeing, or agreeing to disagree, usually in a calm polite manner, after a few pages.

The threads started by bat-guano insane idiots live on because the bat-guano insane idiots refuse to alter their stance one iota, regardless of what evidence is produced to prove that they are bat-guano insane idiots, and continue to argue their point endlessly, in the face of any evidence to the contrary, and most people here refuse to let the bat-guano insane idiots have the last word.

I think.
That's one of the pithiest smart answers I've ever read.
Congrats.
 
I never was served warm beer in Britain.I have no idea where this myth comes from.British beer is served cold,but not chilled beyond flavour.That might be the reason for this calumny.
Okay, here's the real skinny, as told me by my dad who was in Blighty in WWII.

It's so simple you'll be amazed.

Some taste better when at 'shelf' temperature.

Some taste better chilled.

But the real reason he couldn't get a cold beer was that most of the publicans couldn't afford refrigeration in those days.

There was a war on, you know.
 
There are different kinds of faith. There is something called blind faith. For the most part it is impossible for an educated Christian to have blind faith since Christ and the apostles were historical people if we are to believe most historians.
Believing that Jesus and the Apostles existed and lectured on how to treat your slaves is very different to believing Jesus is a type of magic god man who pretended to die but didn't really and now goes round not using his supposed ability to prevent people suffering.

You certainly have blind faith in the existence of your JesusGodthingy.
 
Which of my 844 posts in this thread have been shown to be wrong and if you list any what is the evidence that it is wrong?


DOC, most of those 844 posts in this thread just seem to say that you've already posted your evidence in your [insert number here] posts in this thread, which mostly say that you've posted your evidence in your [insert number here] posts in this thread.

Your ability to post is not evidence that the New Testament writers told the truth.

Rather than just repeatedly update us on your running total, why not link to the specific posts with the evidence? NB: that's partly rhetorical - I suspect that you don't want to get into specifics about what the evidence you've posted actually is because you've already seen it demolished.

Incidentally, the search function here truncates its results at 275. Have you really counted all of your 844 posts by hand? I guess that would explain the recent gap of over a fortnight between your posts.
 
Incidentally, the search function here truncates its results at 275. Have you really counted all of your 844 posts by hand? I guess that would explain the recent gap of over a fortnight between your posts.
If you click on the "number of replies" on the right side of the screen in the subforum thread list it tells you who has posted in that thread, and how many times.
 
Oh no!!! I've only posted 502 times compared to DOC? I need to pump up my posts so that DOC will shut up about his post count!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom