So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

You know, Roger, if you really want to prove your point, why not show us just one example of a 40+ story building being pulled before or after 9/11?

Didnt you tell Unsecured Coins that you would.....and now you cant?

Why is that, Roger.

:bs:
 
Yep, we read his statement....and he pulled the men out. Not sure where you got a crazy idea that he meant the building, since it has never been done on a 40+ story burning building before, or since.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Stop the lies, it only makes you look like a child.
Click to expand...

reported for rule 12 .

It's not our fault you have no evidence to back up your claim, and then lie to forum members about posting information.....after telling them on the phone that you would.

Yep, a typical truther tactic.
 
Gavron said:
Yep, we read his statement....and he pulled the men out.
Click to expand...

So please tell me did he pull the men out before of after the fire commander ordered him too after talking to Silverstien? Oh thats right Chief Nigro told him to pull them BEFORE the call.

Not sure where you got a crazy idea that he meant the building, since it has never been done on a 40+ story burning building before, or since.
Click to expand...

Because common sense shows that if the firemen were out of the building before the call then he could have only been talking about the building.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
1 more time.

READ CHIEF HAYDENS STATEMENTS, you will find the answer for yourself.

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html
Click to expand...


You mean this part?
By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse.
Click to expand...
Or this part?
but by about 2 o'clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
Click to expand...
Or this part?
We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
Click to expand...
Or this one?
Yeah, we had to pull everybody back. It was very difficult. We had to be very forceful in getting the guys out. They didn't want to come out. There were guys going into areas that I wasn't even really comfortable with, because of the possibility of secondary collapses. We didn't know how stable any of this area was. We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon.
Click to expand...
Or maybe this one?

At that point in time, it seemed like a somewhat smaller event, but under any normal circumstances, that's a major event, a 47-story building collapsing. It seemed like a firecracker after the other ones came down, but I mean that's a big building, and when it came down, it was quite an event. But having gone through the other two, it didn't seem so bad. But that's what we were concerned about. We had said to the guys, we lost as many as 300 guys. We didn't want to lose any more people that day.
Click to expand...
Which is pretty much what Silverstein said.

It looks to me they didn't have to do anything, the building was going to come down by itself anyway.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Because common sense shows that if the firemen were out of the building before the call then he could have only been talking about the building.
Click to expand...


common sense?

It makes sense to you that the fire dept would demolish a 40+ story burning building....which has never been done before or since, rather than let it burn?

:i:

Didnt you yourself say a building hadnt collapsed before from fire....but hang on, WTC7 is different so we need ninjas to rush in with "kicker charges" and "beam cutters", and keep it all secret from the public and never do it ever again?
 
Last edited:
Gavron said:
common sense?

It makes sense to you that the fire dept would demolish a 40+ story burning building....which has never been done before or since, rather than let it burn?
Click to expand...

The facts speak for themselves, unless your trying to say the fire chiefs are lying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom