Split Thread What happened to Flight 93?

RedIbis said:
Where did I say there were no hijackers?
Click to expand...

Well since you don't believe a plane crashed in the Pentagon and in Shanksville, those two flights had to go somewhere.

Please, at least show a little consistency in your theories.
 
Pardalis said:
Well since you don't believe a plane crashed in the Pentagon and in Shanksville, those two flights had to go somewhere.

Please, at least show a little consistency in your theories.
Click to expand...

Contesting whether Flight 93 crashed into that ditch in Shanksville has little to do with whether or not terrorists hijacked those planes. You understand that right?
 
RedIbis said:
Contesting whether Flight 93 crashed into that ditch in Shanksville has little to do with whether or not terrorists hijacked those planes. You understand that right?
Click to expand...

No, actually I don't.

Please explain.

They hijacked the planes and flew them where? There were no other plane crashes that day.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
No, actually I don't.

Please explain.

They hijacked the planes and flew them where? There were no other plane crashes that day.
Click to expand...

Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
 
RedIbis said:
Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
Click to expand...

Since UA93 did "crash into that ditch," there is no need to think of any other possibilities.
 
Red, it's not really absolutism, but what we have here is a finite number of planes, and a finite number of passengers.

If we both agree that the laws of physics can't be broken, you have to account for where they went.
 
RedIbis said:
Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
Click to expand...

It may have become self-aware and set up a kiosk on Canal Street making balloon animals.

It didn't, so I'm not bloody well going to look for it there.

Given that no evidence of any kind exists to suggest it did anything but plow into the ground at Shanksville, looking for it in other places seems like a bit of a wasted effort, wouldn't you agree?
 
So we have Saudi patsy hijackers, who hijacked the planes (so therefore not patsies, since they really are hijackers :boggled:), but they didn't crash the planes and instead flew them somewhere never to be found again.

Is that pretty much it, Red?

And why did they hijack the planes to begin with?
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
So we have Saudi patsy hijackers, who hijacked the planes (so therefore not patsies, since they really are hijackers :boggled:), but they didn't crash the planes and instead flew them somewhere never to be found again.

Is that pretty much it, Red?

And why did they hijack the planes to begin with?
Click to expand...

the hijackers only thought they were flying the planes
you know
like those cute lil NASA monkeys :D
 
RedIbis said:
Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
Click to expand...

Please Red, here is another direct question, which you say you always answer...

Please provide us with your best description of what happened on 9/11, howit was done, and who carried it out.

I think it would be interesting to see your ideas, your "conjurings" that put all the pieces in place...since you do not believe the official account, which fits so nicely.

TAM:)
 
RedIbis said:
Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
Click to expand...

What you are looking for would be in the fiction section, over there ---------->.
 
RedIbis said:
Contesting whether Flight 93 crashed into that ditch in Shanksville has little to do with whether or not terrorists hijacked those planes. You understand that right?
Click to expand...


What is your point given that we know that 19 hijackers grabbed 4 planes . One of them was Flight 93 and they crashed it into Shanksville.
 
BigAl said:
What is your point given that we know that 19 hijackers grabbed 4 planes . One of them was Flight 93 and they crashed it into Shanksville.
Click to expand...

If you concider the 360 degree of twooferism then RedIbis is at about 290 again. Should be back to 2005 in just under a week or so then start all over again.
 
RedIbis said:
Are you that much of an absolutist that you can't conjure up any other possibilities if Flight 93 does not crash into that ditch?
Click to expand...

Hang on a sec...are we supposed to use our imaginations to determine what happened in Shanksville, or to figure out what YOU BELIEVE happened in Shanksville?

Why don't you just tell us what you believe, and we'll decide if it's reasonable.
 
T.A.M. said:
Please Red, here is another direct question, which you say you always answer...

Please provide us with your best description of what happened on 9/11, howit was done, and who carried it out.

I think it would be interesting to see your ideas, your "conjurings" that put all the pieces in place...since you do not believe the official account, which fits so nicely.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I answer sincere, direct questions, not unrealistic requests for hundreds of pages of speculation. As you guys say, "that's so 2006."
 
Why don't you just tell us what you believe, and we'll decide if it's reasonable.
Click to expand...

Sounds like fun. Then we get to ask the questions.

Have it ever been like that? In the early days of thrutherism?
 
RedIbis said:
I answer sincere, direct questions, not unrealistic requests for hundreds of pages of speculation. As you guys say, "that's so 2006."
Click to expand...

Do you accept the fact that Flight 93 was hijacked and flown into the ground at Shanksville?

YES [ ]
No [ ]

It's a sincere and direct.
 
RedIbis said:
I answer sincere, direct questions, not unrealistic requests for hundreds of pages of speculation. As you guys say, "that's so 2006."
Click to expand...

No no no no no Red. You use the same tactic as all twoofers.

You Pose a question or conspiracy conundrum.

You Pause for awhile to see what response you get.

Then your supposed to Pounce with a diffinitive 'smoking gun' answer to convince us.

Unfortunately, all twoofers fail at the Pounce stage because you have nothing. Never will.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom