no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[Homeland Insurgency]

Let's highlight the question you frauds ALWAYS run from as it helps us to understand the nature of your game. My point is that you know perfectly well that you're telling lies. You dismiss all evidence inconvenient to your insane delusions, fully aware that your position is absurd and untenable.

I wrote in an earlier post:

You have the opportunity to strike a blow for honest debate. Tell us, very simply, if there has ever been a crash of a commercial jetliner where the identity of the plane has been in question. Please--we are waiting to hear about the "mystery" crash and how it was solved. You "truthers" insist that the real crash investigators and avionics techs are wrong when they explain that serial numbers played no significant role in identifying the four planes hijacked on 9/11/01. I won't waste time asking what you know that the experts don't. No "truther" will ever touch that question, for obvious reasons.
Just tell us when a commercial airliner crashed and there was a mystery surrounding its identity.

You don't want people to get the idea that you have fabricated nonsense again.

I've noticed something about you. You really don't completely read the threads you are in before you post do you?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

So how many plane parts were found on 9/11 debunkers?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

you only posted a serial number for the entire plane
you can get that from the FAA

as for parts they found
heres 1
[qimg]http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/8107/enginemurray1.jpg[/qimg]

notice the size of the rotor and shaft, look familiar? lol

Did the plane that came from have only one engine and was it one of a kind?

lol?

LOL

 

[FineWine]

I've noticed something about you. You really don't completely read the threads you are in before you post do you?

I've noticed something about you. You respond to penetrating questions that expose your dishonesty with dull-witted insults. You NEVER get around to answering the questions.

Tell us about the crash of a commercial airliner where there was serious doubt about the identity of the plane.

 

[dtugg]

tsk tsk

How do you know it was on purpose if you can't even identify it?

I realize that you need to to lie about this in order to keep your insane fantasy alive, but it was identified. To sane people DNA, the FDR, RADAR, eyewitnesses, and the fact that there is no other American Airlines 757 missing is enough to establish for a fact that it was AA77.

In an accident, investigators with carefully examine parts and their serial numbers in order to establish why the plane crashed. 9/11 was clearly not an accident.

Is this simple concept too difficult for you to understand or are you just trolling?

 

[FineWine]

Did the plane that came from have only one engine and was it one of a kind?

lol?

LOL

Given that you will continue your flight from my inconvenient question, I will shove it in your face again. You babble nonsense in reply to detailed explanations provided by crash investigators and avionics techs. I believe that you are an uninformed fraud who promotes nonsense. You can put me in my place by showing that there have been crashes where the identity of the airliner is difficult to determine.

I can't think of any such crash. I STRONGLY DOUBT THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.

 

[BenBurch]

He cannot provide an example because there isn't any to provide, and he is too dishonest to admit he is wrong about anything no matter how trivial.

 

[tsig]

Did the plane that came from have only one engine and was it one of a kind?

lol?

LOL

Laugh now. Your plane is boarding.

 

[FineWine]

He cannot provide an example because there isn't any to provide, and he is too dishonest to admit he is wrong about anything no matter how trivial.

Of course he can't provide any examples. He is willing to play a sick smoke-and-mirrors game in the hope that nobody will pay attention to the crash investigators and avionics techs. The frauds invent a totally baseless myth, that serial-numbered parts are necessary to determine the identity of a crashed airliner. Then they engage in elaborate deceptions to conceal the FACT that serial numbers do NOT play a significant role in identifying the aircraft. There is never a mystery, and there certainly wasn't doubt on 9/11 about which flights were missing.

 

[Justin39640]

Did the plane that came from have only one engine and was it one of a kind?

lol?

LOL

heres the magnesium alloy casing from the other one

 

[Baylor]

I answered exactly what was asked.

Why was an article written how the plane was identified and list the registration and serial numbers as evidence?

That's your explanation? Another nonsensical question. Great. As already pointed out, your own source disagrees with you.

I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model and specific registration number of the aircraft and in most cases the precise cause of the accident.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

How many plane parts were found on 9/11?

 

[A W Smith]

Irrelevant

How many plane parts were found on 9/11?

Start a new thread, The OP of this thread

no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

which you and others have failed to prove.

 

[dtugg]

How many plane parts were found on 9/11?

I don't know, nor do I care what the exact number of plane parts found was. Why does it matter? Is there some magical number that it should have been? If you actually cared beyond your purposes of trolling you would ask the FBI, NTSB, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

Here is some questions that you will almost certainly ignore: How many plane parts were found from TWA 800? I will rightly assume that you have no idea. Do you doubt that it was TWA 800 that crashed in the ocean? Explain your answer.

 

[Justin39640]

I don't know, nor do I care what the exact number of plane parts found was. Why does it matter? Is there some magical number that it should have been? If you actually cared beyond your purposes of trolling you would ask the FBI, NTSB, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

Here is some questions that you will almost certainly ignore: How many plane parts were found from TWA 800? I will rightly assume that you have no idea. Do you doubt that it was TWA 800 that crashed in the ocean? Explain your answer.

it sounds like hes implying that no matter how severe an airliner crash is
you should find every single part that came out of it
like it was a lego model that was dropped on a hardwood floor lol

 

[NobbyNobbs]

Yes he has shown it a lot, Just too bad he cannot back it up with real evidence, or show physcial evidence.

You do know that AA77 was off screeen for seerveral minutes?

Someone check me to see if I understand this correctly.

What Ultima is saying about the radar : what really happened :: NBC going off the air for the night : me simply switching off my TV set.

Am I close?


Oh, and I found this hysterically funny, and am surprised no one else mentioned it. First...

Why can't you provide the serial numbers i have been asking for since being in this forum?

And then, in the very next post...

I have been doing research but the FAA will not release serial numbers for the planes.

 

[Shalamar]

Perhaps the twoofer terrorists believe that the planes can only be identified if the planes can be perfectly rebuilt and reassembled from the crash debris? Otherwise.. INSIDE JOBBY JOB!

Though they do seem to be on a 'no plane' kick again. Can't ID the plane wreckage from the serial numbers on the parts scattered about? OMG! There was no plane!

There is more than one way to identify a subject in a crash. Several ways. If one cannot be used, there are many others which have been shown over and over again.

 

[BenBurch]

If we had all the parts and all the numbers, they would just claim that a duplicate aircraft was built and stored in Area-51 (next to the flying saucer) in preparation for 9/11.

 

[Dave Rogers]

A senior official at the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) in Tokyo says the FedEx MD-11F's registration number is N526FE. According to Flight's ACAS database FedEx owns this aircraft, which has a serial number of 48600, and it was built in 1994.

The follow up question was "what evidence did they look at to determine which aircraft it was?" We have here the identity of the aircraft, defined by its registration and serial numbers. How was that identity established? Was it by careful and painstaking sifting through the wreckage, finding serial numbered parts, and tracking those parts back through the manufacturers' records? Or did someone, at some point, have the sense to phone FedEx and say "Which plane was it that crashed in Tokyo?"

Dave

 

[stateofgrace]

So how many plane parts were found on 9/11 debunkers?

Why do you need to know this ?

Why is this so important to you ?

Did they list all the plane parts of TWA 800 or Pam Am 103 ?

Maybe you could set an example and provide a list of the plane parts from these incidents and show how they were used to identify the aircrafts.