no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[BirdyBuddy]

A report from the NTSB about the wheel matching AA77.

Which you agree has not been released. How would you expect Beachnut or anyone else to have access to them. Again, it's a bit unfair to ask.

But my question was what other form of proof would you find acceptable?

I ask you this, because at some point in the future documents may be released that may have the info you are looking for. (I qualify that because I have no idea, really.)
Either you can wait patiently, or argue in an endless circle that will never get you an answer because it seems you will accept no other source than unknown, unreleased documents.

 

[Gavron]

Sorry but evidence from the Moussaoui trail has nothing to do with the crime scene invetigation on the crash sites.

But evidence used in the Moussaoui trial was collected as part of the criminal investigation at the crash sites. That evidence was found to be convincing in a court of law.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Which you agree has not been released. How would you expect Beachnut or anyone else to have access to them. Again, it's a bit unfair to ask.

To show him that he cannot pot evidence.

But my question was what other form of proof would you find acceptable?

Actual evidence that can be verified.

 

[ULTIMA1]

But evidence used in the Moussaoui trial was collected as part of the criminal investigation at the crash sites. That evidence was found to be convincing in a court of law.

NO the evindece was used in a trial not a crime scene investigation.

 

[Jackanory]

NO the evindece was used in a trial not a crime scene investigation.

Pointless drivel. Please clarify this statement

 

[Gavron]

A report from the NTSB about the wheel matching AA77.

You mean the report from the NTSB that hasnt been released yet?



Bravo, Roger....tell us something else you havet said repeatedly for the past few years.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Pointless drivel. Please clarify this statement

How simple can i make it?

The evidence was not gathered for a criminal investigation but for trail evidence.

 

[Gavron]

trail investigation? They building a walking path around the Pentagon?

 

[BirdyBuddy]

To show him that he cannot pot evidence.

You are asking posters to provide specific evidence to which you acknowledge has not been released. How can anybody make that possible. You are holding Beachnut to an exceptionally high standard you yourself can't even meet.

Actual evidence that can be verified.

Again, help me here. What that would be? Please qualify what you would consider verifiable evidence.

 

[Jackanory]

You mean the report from the NTSB that hasnt been released yet?



Bravo, Roger....tell us something else you havet said repeatedly for the past few years.

Perhaps Roger should send a FOIA to the NTSB - oops.

Or perhaps Roger could ask his peers at the NSA what they know, then he wouldnt need to come here - he could go to the authorities or the press. Surely the man from the NSA knows more than JREF.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You are asking posters to provide evidence specifically to which you acknowledge has not been released. How can anybody make that possible. You are holding Beachnut to an exceptionally high standard you yourself can't even meet.

No i am aksing them to provide what they ask me to me provide.

I am not holding beachnut to any higher standard that he holds me.



Again, help me here. What that would be? Please qualify what you would consider verifiable evidence.[/QUOTE]


I am seeking actual evidnece that can be verified. Actual evdence not something that the media has told everyone to believe.

 

[Gavron]

Why do you keep asking posted for information you know has not been released yet, Roger?

Why are you afraid to use evidence proven in a court of law?

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html

 

[ULTIMA1]

Perhaps Roger should send a FOIA to the NTSB - oops.

Will you if i do? Or are you afraid of the truth?

Or perhaps Roger could ask his peers at the NSA what they know, then he wouldnt need to come here - he could go to the authorities or the press. Surely the man from the NSA knows more than JREF.

I have done more research and sent more FOIA requests then most poeple on here put together. Oh and for the record most of my fellow employess are with me on this.

I come here to try to get poeple on here to try to find and accept the truth instead of just accepting whats been told.

 

[A W Smith]

Whats the significance?

A report from the NTSB about the wheel matching AA77.

Why a wheel and not a flight data recorder? Why is the rest of the evidence not good enough? I know. Because today. The wheel is just one "gotcha" for the truth movement. Once the wheels serial number are released to the public if ever and tied to flight 77. You will move onto something else. Like the toilet seat or galley sink or the flight tray tables or seat cushions or the blankets and pillows.

Edited by Gaspode: 

Removed breach of Rule 12

 

[Jackanory]

Actual evdence not something that the media has told everyone to believe[/COLOR].

Roger - The majority of what you post is from some media based or second hand source - and you believe it.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Why do you keep asking posted for information you know has not been released yet, Roger?

To show people that it has not been released and that means they do not know what happened that day like they keep stating they do.

Why are you afraid to use evidence proven in a court of law?

I would if it was verified to be good evidence for a crime scene investigation and not just used for a trial.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Roger - The majority of what you post is from some media based or second hand source - and you believe it.

NO most of the evidence posted comes from or can be verified by government and profesional research sources.

 

[DGM]

Tell me why again the NTSB would produce a report? Do these "truthers" think they have nothing better to do?

9/11 had nothing to do with what they are tasked to do, period end of story.

 

[Jackanory]

NO most of the evidence posted comes from or can be verified by government and profesional research sources.

Then post those sources Roger, and not the junk you keep posting. If you want to be taken seriously you have to do something different.

 

[BirdyBuddy]

No i am aksing them to provide what they ask me to me provide.
I am not holding beachnut to any higher standard that he holds me.

Then you have access to unreleased documents? Because that is what you're asking for specifically, as you have not stated what else you would consider acceptable evidence.

I am seeking actual evidnece that can be verified. Actual evdence not something that the media has told everyone to believe.

I asked you to qualify - meaning describe - what you would consider verifiable evidence. You did not answer my question. Maybe if you could give me a specific example of what you would expect to see.