ps I take it you have read my post to you and that you accept your collapse scenario was false? Or are you just ignoring the facts and moving on to the next conspiracy talking point?
You appear to be answering a reply here that I made to another poster who made a simple statement about jet fuel burning temperature in open air without any argument or evidence. I said that the steel was reported molten weeks after 9/11, I did not claim that it was a "fact" that steel was molten. In wartime the enemy (the global common masses) are fed a lot of bogus stories "to muddy the water" and this, plus the residual heat stories during the winter of 2001/2, out at the Fresh Kills spoil location, may conceivably be bogus. However the reports exist and they were not officially addressed by the official US regime conspiracy theories for the event.
Google: Dust To Dust: The Health Effects Of 9/11
I have now found your reply to one of my posts elsewhere and you appear to be stating things as incontrovertible "facts" when I would consider such statements of "fact" as epistemologically unsound, since they are based on data sources that might have been corrupted. You appear to acknowledge this when you said sarcastically "NIST et al are all government shill liars, but you're going to quote their figures anyway" when I was simply quoting their figures to illustrate that their own theory was internally flawed. When you said: "not including the core sections up to 60 stories which stood even longer" you must understand that such an observation is completely beside the point as far as roof level material estimations for ground level impact time. Seismic data may also deal with stuff tumbling around the pile heap, behind the dust cloud, long after the roof level material was out of the sky. Anyway, in short, when anybody starts saying that they are spouting "facts" about anything I tend to suspect that they have minds untrained to think philosophically about any extrinsic phenomena whatsoever. When you say "Be very careful when accusing people of war crimes and mass murder. It is inflammatory and irresponsible to do this when you clearly lack the knowledge to judge." I am merely pointing out that the US regime launched an illegal war of aggression on a bogus WMD (+9/11 fear-mongering) pretext that led to mass murder (plus torture etc.) in Iraq and that under UN and Nuremberg rules it was indeed an "illegal war of aggression". Recorded war criminal acts (the Iraq war itself being criminal) inside Iraq (and acts inside Afghanistan) also contravened the Hague Conventions and the Geneva Conventions. This pretty clearly makes the imperialist US regime a rogue, pariah, war criminal regime, by any reasonable international law definition. Therefore it is hardly surprising that much of the world suspects that rogue elements within the evil US industrial military complex engineered 9/11 for global strategic objectives. Orchestrated a Hegelian Dialectic Thesis, a global war pretext that will continue to be very unpleasant for the majority of the economically farmed masses of the USA. That 9/11 was a militaristic political coup or putsch that in "the global grand chess game" will ultimately and deliberately wreck the USA so that international forces of capital can make even greater, huge, profits. Alternatively, some facile minded people appear to favour the simplistic theory that 19 foreign grumpy young men (who apparently simply "hated freedom" as a motive) got very lucky 3 times out of 4 on 9/11. History will see where things go, but I suspect that the USA will be, ultimately, in very deep trouble (economically, politically, spiritually, internationally and socially) from a very sophisticated, awesomely brilliant, 9/11 chess move.
