Christopher7
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 6,538
Wrong!The sulfur was explained,
NCSTAR 1-3C pg 232
6. No source for the sulfur was identified.
Wrong!The sulfur was explained,
There are tons of sulfur in the WTC.Wrong!
NCSTAR 1-3C pg 232
6. No source for the sulfur was identified.
You don't seem to know the difference between glowing and flowing, not to mention you are ignoring dipping and dripping.That is the temperature of molten steel; it glows, I saw it yesterday in my fireplace, I put in steel pan, it glowed, which is molten, the thread title.
Of course dear.I also put in Aluminum, it melted and had coals in it and it glowed because the organic junk was in there.
The only known way to get sulfur into steel and cause intergranular melting is thermate.There are tons of sulfur in the WTC.
Name another or stop claiming that.Thermite is not the only explanation.
Ever hear the one about the ant and the drawbridge?And that is not a melted beam. It looks perfectly straight to me which, how can it melt but remain in near perfect condition? I see a ripple in the steel behind the real bad damage.
Wrong. Sad you pick the insane thermite/thermate delusion made up by Jones in September 2005 out of the blue. 4 years after 911 Jones makes up lies due to Iraq, and here over 7 years after 911, you are fooled by a fraud.The only known way to get sulfur into steel and cause intergranular melting is thermate.
And you post a paper as your proof the WTC fell due to fire. This is coolWhat part of "melted" don't you understand. He was referring to partially melted girders.
melted: change from solid to liquid state.
You are talking in circles to justify your denial.
http://www.nistreview.org/WTC-ASTANEH.pdf
AcetyleneName another or stop claiming that.
Enough!No you would be putting incorrect words into my mouth like a dishonest person who is a proven liar. They could not tell if it was steel.
Enough!
I will no longer respond to any post in which you call me a liar.
Have a nice day.![]()
Dumb answer. Acetylene cannot account for the molten steel falling from the south tower or the tons of molten metal being dipped out of the debris pile in the buckets of excavators.Acetylene
Yes it can. "Thermite cutter charges" cannot account for the molten steel falling from the south tower or the tons of molten metal being dipped out of the debris pile in the buckets of excavators.Dumb answer. Acetylene cannot account for the molten steel falling from the south tower or the tons of molten metal being dipped out of the debris pile in the buckets of excavators.
Talk to yourself much?Because you are afraid of the truth.
Neither of us knows all there is to know about thermite and the ways it can be used.Admit that "thermite cutter charges" do not exist and even if they did they would not be able to cut a steel box column. If you do not accept this fact then you are in denial.
No. This is a truly pathetic response.Talk to yourself much?.
WE KNOW "THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES" DO NOT EXIST.Neither of us knows all there is to know about thermite and the ways it can be used.
"I can't figure out how that happened so it did not happen." is a denial catch phrase.
You don't know that.Yes it can. "Thermite cutter charges" cannot account for the molten steel falling from the south tower or the tons of molten metal being dipped out of the debris pile in the buckets of excavators.
No you don't!No. This is a truly pathetic response.
WE KNOW THERMITE CUTTER CHARGES DO NOT EXIST.
YES I DOYou don't know that.
Been there done that.There is no other explanation for the molten steel.
Come up with one or stop denying that it was thermite.
Show us a "thermite cutter charge" capable of cutting a steel box column that existed in 2001 or admit thermite is NOT an explanation. Anything less is a denial tactic.No you don't!
You just can't accept the reality of the situation.
You are in denial.
CRANKY OLD PENSIONER said:What melted the steel if not thermite.