• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Molten Steel

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/index.html
Click to expand...


NIST explain the eroded beam from the Tower and also give some examples of sources. They quite categrically state it happened in the pile.

Did you not read it?
 
Sunstealer said:
It's utterly mad! I don't know whether to laugh or put my head in my hands. It really does show the inside of a truther mind though. Can you imagine the impracticalities of doing this? That one in a million chance that a fire couldn't be fought or a plane smashing into a building so hey lads lets wire the building up just in case! :confused:

I don't know how many tons of explosives demolition companies use but could you imagine the risk of these being stolen? An electrical fault could set of charges, explosives have a shelf life, the whole loony plan is fraught with danger.

Imagine the conversation between the insurer and owner of the building! Our premiums should be less because we have tons of explosives in our building!
Click to expand...
ahh see, but now you are inviting the truthers to add another layer to their already supercomplex theory.

Now they will say that the NWO, well aware of these risks, developed top secret hardware, in the form of a waterproof, fireproof, electrical proof casing to surround the applicator for the thermite. This applicator insures the simultaneous application of an equal amount of thermite completely around the steel beam, and maintains its horizontal positioning thoughout, to insure a nice horizontal cut through the steel...

TAM:D
 
Last edited:
JimBenArm said:
You really should move here, though. You get to see all kinds of things, like unicorns, BigFoot, and Nessie!
My favorite BigFoot, George, and I are going out to dinner tonight. Wanna join us?
Click to expand...

Depends, will there be cake? There must be cake.

TAM;)
 
well I'm in. I'll leave my brain, logic, and rationality at the door though...don't wanna stand out you know.

TAM:)
 
funk de fino said:
NIST explain the eroded beam from the Tower and also give some examples of sources. They quite categrically state it happened in the pile.

Did you not read it?
Click to expand...

I read it when I began looking into 9/11 but I don't do NIST anymore I'm afraid except for occasional reference.
 
Last edited:
yes, why bother when you have the Journal for 9/11 Retards and other great collections of science to confirm your conclusions.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
yes, why bother when you have the Journal for 9/11 Retards and other great collections of science to confirm your conclusions.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

One great advantage of said Journal, admittedly, is the complimentary box of Crayolas accompanying each issue.:D
 
J. Wellington Wimpy said:
One great advantage of said Journal, admittedly, is the complimentary box of Crayolas accompanying each issue.:D
Click to expand...
Yeah, but it's only the 16-color set, not the big 64-color one, with the built-in sharpener. Of course, considering who's handling them, it's a good thing the sharpener is not included.
 
JimBenArm said:
Yeah, but it's only the 16-color set, not the big 64-color one, with the built-in sharpener. Of course, considering who's handling them, it's a good thing the sharpener is not included.
Click to expand...

Yes you have to subscribe to Gage's full set of DVDs to get that prize.

TAM;)
 
bill smith said:
I read it when I began looking into 9/11 but I don't do NIST anymore I'm afraid except for occasional reference.
Click to expand...

So you have read it and failed to understand what it says about the beam?

You do know that NIST sent steel samples out to independant contractors who agreed with their findings?

What did the NIST reports say about that beam and why would the lying morons you keep linking to be a better source than them?
 
funk de fino said:
So you have read it and failed to understand what it says about the beam?

You do know that NIST sent steel samples out to independant contractors who agreed with their findings?

What did the NIST reports say about that beam and why would the lying morons you keep linking to be a better source than them?
Click to expand...

The government can lean on anybody it wants to especially if they want to survive in business. I'd say some of those contractors were about as independent as the Purdue nalysis.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
The government can lean on anybody it wants to especially if they want to survive in business. I'd say some of those contractors were about as independent as the Purdue nalysis.
Click to expand...

Did you have an actual argument to make? Or will you be standing by your incredulous implied belief that the U.S. Government has sufficient omniscience to persuade virtually every engineer in every country of the world to publicly support that which they privately believe to be scientifically inaccurate?
 
GStan said:
Did you have an actual argument to make? Or will you be standing by your incredulous implied belief that the U.S. Government has sufficient omniscience to persuade virtually every engineer in every country of the world to publicly support that which they privately believe to be scientifically inaccurate?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say publicly support as much as not publicly deny
 
bill smith said:
The government can lean on anybody it wants to especially if they want to survive in business. I'd say some of those contractors were about as independent as the Purdue nalysis.
Click to expand...

You underestimate the power and will of people who, if your assertions are true, saw their friends die due to a government crime.

There is no "eyewitnesses for truth" or "first responders for truth" group.

I wonder why.
 
BigAl said:
You underestimate the power and will of people who, if your assertions are true, saw their friends die due to a government crime.

There is no "eyewitnesses for truth" or "first responders for truth" group.

I wonder why.
Click to expand...
there is a' firefighters for 9/11 truth group'.
The latest one is 'Religous leaders for 9/11 truth'.
'Medical Professionals for 9/11 truth and Lawyers for 9/11 truth are fairly recent additions as well..

planty more too...
 
Last edited:
There is no "eyewitnesses for truth" group. I meant to type, "there is no "WTC first-responders for truth" group".

As for all the members of all the other groups, nobody knows why any of these people believe whatever it is they believe because they won't speak in public, make their case using whatever professional expertise they have, and then address polite, relevant questions from others with similar expertise. Most of them parrot Truther boilerplate assertions as if there is a standard script somewhere.

None of these people seem to feel strongly enough about about the biggest crime in history to speak in public and use their professional connections and expertise to spread the word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom