9/11 Commission records unsealed

[MikeW]

The summary of William Rodriguez Commission interview is now available here. Keep reading after the basic MFR for the original interview notes.

 

[ref]

The summary of William Rodriguez Commission interview is now available here. Keep reading after the basic MFR for the original interview notes.

Surprise, surprise, no mention about bombs! Not even a single hint indicating that Willie thought there were bombs, or that it was an inside job.

He immediately thought the explosion was caused by a generator. Shortly after the first explosion a second explosion rocked the building and caused the office's false ceiling to collapse. Following these explosions Felipe David, who was severely burned, ran into the office. Rodriquez said there was a third explosion and he believed then the explosions were caused by an earthquake.

He couldn't help mentioning this:

Rodriquez said he has been honored for his actions on 9/11 and is considered a hero in Puerto Rico.

Where are the mentions of his 20 expert witnesses who he claims to have heard explosions? Where is any mention of the 33rd floor, where he claims they heard what sounded like heavy equipment being dragged across the level above?
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/1219050.interview_the_untold_story_of_september_11/

 

[MikeW]

Good points! Be a little wary, though - I think I've another Rodriguez document somewhere, so it's possible that may contain further information. Let's not come to any definitive conclusions just yet. (They're probably right anyway, but it's best to be sure.)

 

[RedIbis]

Surprise, surprise, no mention about bombs! Not even a single hint indicating that Willie thought there were bombs, or that it was an inside job.



He couldn't help mentioning this:




Where are the mentions of his 20 expert witnesses who he claims to have heard explosions? Where is any mention of the 33rd floor, where he claims they heard what sounded like heavy equipment being dragged across the level above?
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/1219050.interview_the_untold_story_of_september_11/

I'm unaware of any time that Rodriguez has claimed that 9/11 was an Inside Job. If you have a link to such a reference, please post it. Also, Rodriguez never claims to know the origin of the explosions he experienced. The crux of his testimony is that the first explosion occurred below him in a sub basement level before the N. Tower is struck by the airplane.

 

[T.A.M.]

I'm unaware of any time that Rodriguez has claimed that 9/11 was an Inside Job. If you have a link to such a reference, please post it. Also, Rodriguez never claims to know the origin of the explosions he experienced. The crux of his testimony is that the first explosion occurred below him in a sub basement level before the N. Tower is struck by the airplane.

Well not quite confessing to it, but here,

http://bishoponair.com/index.php?q=node/2156

When asked about the 9/11 Commission, he does not hesitate to say “Cover up, total cover up ... Remember the 9/11 Commission was created and they spent more money on the Monica Lewinsky trial than on the investigation of the biggest crime scene in history, it is ridiculous. They didn’t do the right thing, it was a whitewash, I believe the commissioners were either tied up or they were lied to by the different intelligence agencies, but up to now five year after I believe that the report is just a bunch of bull.”

and here:

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/1219050.interview_the_untold_story_of_september_11/

ncredible though it seems, Rodriguez decided there could be only one explanation. It was a coverup.

And there could be only one reason for a cover-up - the US government itself was behind the attacks.

"My allegations were never investigated and the perpetrators never caught. The people they did question - the chiefs of the fire and police departments - weren't even in the building. It was a complete whitewash."

In desperation, Rodriguez turned to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which was investigating the collapse of the World Trade Centre, promulgating his theory about the explosion in the basement.

So what is meant by allegations?? The perpetrators never caught? Well unless he means the hijackers who died, he seems to be implying inside job, does he not????

TAM

 

[DavidJames]

So what is meant by allegations?? The perpetrators never caught? Well unless he means the hijackers who died, he seems to be implying inside job, does he not????

TAM

Listen carefully and you can hear the sound of the Semantics Scalpel^tm being sharpened in preparation for your post to be sliced and diced into RedIbis sized chunks of meaningless drivel.

 

[Disbelief]

I'm unaware of any time that Rodriguez has claimed that 9/11 was an Inside Job. If you have a link to such a reference, please post it.

Didn't he have a lawsuit against Bush and others claiming complicity to commit mass murder?

Here's a link:

http://rodriguezlawsuit.googlepages.com/RodriguezComplaint.pdf

 

[RedIbis]

Well not quite confessing to it, but here,

http://bishoponair.com/index.php?q=node/2156



and here:

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/1219050.interview_the_untold_story_of_september_11/





So what is meant by allegations?? The perpetrators never caught? Well unless he means the hijackers who died, he seems to be implying inside job, does he not????

TAM

But isn't it your explanation that the cover up was to CYA, as opposed to Inside Job? In other words, you should know as well as anyone that a cover up is not the same as an Inside Job.

 

[Disbelief]

But isn't it your explanation that the cover up was to CYA, as opposed to Inside Job? In other words, you should know as well as anyone that a cover up is not the same as an Inside Job.

What does this matter in light of the link I provided that clearly shows he believes it was an inside job. Fron page 10 of the link (highlight mine):

a. Scientific data clearly indicates that the World Trade Center buildings, including the
little-discussed Building 7, were destroyed by means of controlled demolitions, of the sort that
take weeks or months to prepare and could only have been an "inside job"; there were large
explosive charges in the sub-basements of both of the Twin Towers, as well as smaller charges
used to bring the buildings down in an orderly fashion, and neither tower collapsed due solely to
the aircraft impacts or heat generated by the burning of jet fuel on the aircraft;

 

[TexasJack]

I think it is prety clear in the link Disbelief linked that he's claiming inside job

THE WTC TWIN TOWERS, AS WELL AS WTC BUILDING #7, WERE
DESTROYED BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, AS CLEARLY PROVEN
BY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS; THIS DEMOLITION COULD ONLY HAVE
BEEN AN "INSIDE JOB."……………………………………………………

http://rodriguezlawsuit.googlepages.com/RodriguezComplaint.pdf

 

[Pardalis]

I'm unaware of any time that Rodriguez has claimed that 9/11 was an Inside Job.

Is that why he's part of the Truth Movement and gives all these conferences on the subject?

The crux of his testimony is that the first explosion occurred below him in a sub basement level before the N. Tower is struck by the airplane.

He doesn't say that in his released testimony.

He also mentions something about an earthquake, which is a new thing to me. Since you believe his word is gospel, was there an earthquake that day in the East Coast?

 

[funk de fino]

I cannot for the life of me understand why Red feels the need to make a fool of himself and defend the lying POS Willie?

 

[johnny karate]

But isn't it your explanation that the cover up was to CYA, as opposed to Inside Job? In other words, you should know as well as anyone that a cover up is not the same as an Inside Job.

Where was your semantic pedantry when you outright lied about FDNY Captain Currid's testimony?

 

[beachnut]

But isn't it your explanation that the cover up was to CYA, as opposed to Inside Job? In other words, you should know as well as anyone that a cover up is not the same as an Inside Job.

You should know how to resreach after 7 years. right?

http://rodriguezlawsuit.googlepages.com/RodriguezComplaint.pdf

THE WTC TWIN TOWERS, AS WELL AS WTC BUILDING #7, WERE
DESTROYED BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, AS CLEARLY PROVEN
BY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS; THIS DEMOLITION COULD ONLY HAVE
BEEN AN "INSIDE JOB."……………………………………………………P. 38

You made an error. Willy clearly uses "inside job" in a document sent to a court. Willy takes action and says what you missed he said because you failed to research 911, or Willy before you hit the button to post your false post.

You have to do some work to post reality; you can post like you do all the time, pure opinions with no real work but your own ideas based on pretty much nothing.

Willy’s proven by the laws of physics. Funny, Willy and 911Truth both have a big zero in the physics column. Why?

 

[MikeW]

I found the second Rodriguez pages! They're just more (handwritten) interview notes. See them here.

 

[MikeW]

Well, well, well.

Sure, it comes with a proviso, but look what I found:

 

[T.A.M.]

beachnut:

thanks for the find man. I didn't have the time earlier to day to go through all of the things that Rodriguez had said, over the years, but I knew for certain, somewhere, he had declared that he believed 9/11 was an inside job.

TAM

 

[RedIbis]

I found the second Rodriguez pages! They're just more (handwritten) interview notes. See them here.

They're quite difficult to decipher but I don't see anything inconsistent with Rodriguez's later testimony. He reports an explosion that he thought might be a generator in the basement. Then he heard another explosion that cracked the ceilings and walls.

I know you guys love to pile on and fire up a good ol’ fashioned witch hunt, but you should pay much closer attention to the specifics of Rodriguez's testimony. I don't think the people trapped and screaming in the elevator would use the crude language being used here to describe Rodriguez, the guy who finds a very long electrician's ladder, sends it down the elevator shaft (the freight elevator has an open roof), to free several people, all at great risk to his own life. This is just one example of how he was able to save people that day. I wonder how many people here would have had the presence of mind to accomplish what he did in a very short amount of time.

 

[johnny karate]

They're quite difficult to decipher but I don't see anything inconsistent with Rodriguez's later testimony. He reports an explosion that he thought might be a generator in the basement. Then he heard another explosion that cracked the ceilings and walls.

Good points. Especially the portion I bolded. Because as we all know:

How people choose to interpret their experience later on is often of little consequence compared to the value of that first, unadulturated account.

So you must agree that Rodriguez's initial impression was the correct one: He experienced nothing more sinister than a generator explosion. I'm glad we got that settled.

 

[ref]

Well, well, well.

Sure, it comes with a proviso, but look what I found:

http://911myths.com/images/thumb/c/cd/Mineta_peoc.png/800px-Mineta_peoc.png

Nice, nice. I wonder what Griffin's reaction to that will be. Oh wait, I know that already. It says the times may not be reliable, so they can easily ignore it.