On topic:
TLB, can you please explain to me how does the CiT reconcile the facts that; all their witnesses recall differing flight paths but they all (the great and vast, overwhelming majority of all witnesses do) agree on one aspect of the flight path, that it ended when the plane hit the building, and; the CiT choses to discard the single point of agreement in favor of lumping all the differing reports as being NoC.
Off topic:
Well you better run with whatever you can as an excuse for that because the north side evidence isn't going anywhere even if TheLoneBedouin is banned and CIT completely disappears.
If you get banned it will be due to your actions and it will mean that there is one less person taking action on the 911 cause in the time honoured CiT/PfT fashion of argueing on the internet.
The evidence is real and it's only going to grow.
So far it has only grown by vulgar quote mining, willfully ignoring the vast bulk of evidence and twisting of witness and media statements.
That's why you are all so afraid to talk to any witnesses!
The witnesses have already spoken. IF YOU have a problem with what they said before then YOU contact them. Of those witnesses who the CiT actually asked if they saw a flyover all replied that it did not fly over, it hit the building.
You don't want to confirm what you already know is truth.
Actually I and I daresay all who argue against you here, already know what the truth is and it has been confirmed many times over. The CiT and PfT however "know" what occured in the same way that a fundementalist "knows" how the Universe began, pure unwavering belief. In the same fashion by which a fundementalist will twist and distort science to try and 'prove' their point, the CiT twist and distort it to try to bolster their contentions.
There are plenty more north side witnesses and there are plenty more flyover witnesses as indicated to the CMH only weeks after 9/11 by ANC witness Erik Dihle.
No, you have a very small, perhaps even non-existant, subset of witnesses who you claim are flyover witnesses.
The fact is that you have lost this debate so you are doing your best to abandon it as you recline into a comfortable position of ridicule and denial.
The CiT refuses to take their supposedly concrete, solid, irrefutable evidence to a courtroom. So does the PfT. Both groups steadfastly refuse to alter their method of getting the message out. Both groups fail utterly to explain the vast amount of physical evidence at the Pentagon can be reconciled with their contentions. All they can do is state that anything that contradicts them is obviously fake. Why is it obviously fake? Mostly because it contradicts their contentions.
But it will keep haunting you and you'll keep doing your best to respond with spin, diversions, and lawyer-like deceptions while pretending like you don't really care.
Actually Mackey has been the most tireless advocate of using math and science to refute the nonsense spewing forth from both CiT and the PfT.
But you DO care and you won't ignore it that's for sure!
Should you not add;
"Muuhahahaha"
Just like Gravy couldn't stay away after his big public departure from this sub-forum. It's always funny watching you guys squirm as you pretend like you are forcing yourselves to chime in while trying to claim that you just took us off "ignore" or whatever.
As explained in many ways and at many times, most here simply cannot abide the propigation of idiocy in the name of science and truth. That people who do get under our skin is hardly a suprise.
The point I made about people appealing to your authority wasn't necessarily meant to suggest that it was happening from an argumentative stand-point at that moment.
So you meant it in the best possible way?
Their "appeal to authority" is much more shallow than that and merely used as an emotional crutch to help boost the group-think morale.
Speaking for myself anytime that Mackey has produced a tech fact or used a math formula I have actually checked the math and application of the formulae for myself. I daresay that the CiT collectively have their eyes gloss over if confronted with a + sign much less the application of physical formulas. PfT is not much better. I see that Cappy Bobby still cannot conceive of what I was doing with the bank angle formula. That indicates his incomplete understanding of how to work vectors.
There really isn't anything intellectual about it at all.
About the CiT, correct.
You see what I meant is that the core members here will for the most part desperately hurl insults and be their usual immature obnoxious selves
SOME members here do that. I personally do not condone it and I try not to partake in it myself(not always successfully), but have you looked at what occurs on PfT or CiT's forum? To my mind its a lot worse and on PfT one DOES get banned simply and solely for being in disagreement with the stance of the majority on the site. That does not occur here.
looking all silly until you jump in with some hollow pseudo-technical rhetoric with all the confidence of "R.Mackey NASA scientist extraordinaire" causing them to fawn all over you as if you made everything all better again.
Which I suppose you will think I am doing now.
Let me know when you are able to
scientifically refute the evidence for real.
When the CiT learns how to actually do an interview and what is and isn't 'science', get back to us with that knowledge.
