ok you guys must be getting desperate your taking quotes from other people to try and make it look as if i said those things ,then debunking them .Reminds me of history channel.
in response to questions directed against me
1.Wheres the device which shoots nanothermite.
a. Possibly it doesnt exist because, a solgel nanothermite could be applied to steel in a foam or spray on manner.
b.the devices were destroyed by either
-nanothermite reaction
-the explosive nature of the event( remember computers werent found in the dust either.Just steel and dust.
-the cleanup workers such as as fbi at freshkills removed any left over devices (least likely too risky)
2.Finding common metal oxides in dust isnt uncommon?
- Yes that is true but to find all these combined into one sphere is.
3.Sound of explosion.
-A hot jet of air isnt that noisy, remember oxy cetalene torches dont make Boom noises.
- I wouldnt be so sure that explosions werent heard.There are many witnesses who heard them,in the 1993 wtc bombing witness couldnt hear the explosions from the other tower.
Finally if you listen to the Video ,Why cant you hear Tonnes of Steel hit the ground as if that wouldnt make a loud boom sound either.
So the audio recording devices and or tampering with audio must be taken into consideration.
1a.) One of the identifying characteristics of a foam is that it isn't as dense as the solid from which it is made.
Given the large amounts of thermite (or micro, nano, pico, or femtothermite) necessary to melt through a column, foam would make a very large volume package to try to wrap around a column. And now you have to smuggle a spray or foam applicator rig in, use it, allow the stuff to cure... This isn't even grasping at straws. It's just imagining that you're pretending that somewhere there is a straw to grasp.
1b.) The end result of a thermite reaction is iron. There was no report of pieces of column that were mysteriously thicker than they should have been. Thinner, eroded by a well-understood process involving sulphur, yes. Thicker, no.
1c.) Apparently you see how unlikely this is, so why bring it up?
2.) No. You're just wrong. There are lots of microspherules around. They're extremely common, because they are made of common elements and can be created by all sorts of everyday activities such as welding and grinding and burning stuff in furnaces. If you are specifically referring to the particles that Jones is on about, the silicon in them is inconsistent with their creation by thermite.
3.) If the reaction is explosive, then there's a shockwave. That's the whole point of an explosion. It's the shockwave that does the damage. In a shaped charge, it is the shockwave that is shaped. No shockwave? No directionality. No directionality? It becomes much more difficult to cut a column.
And if you have a shockwave, you have a boom. A shockwave large enough to cut a column makes a very large boom indeed. The 1993 bombing did do damage, but came nowhere near cutting a column.
I'm certain explosions were heard. Large fires tend to have explosions. They're not necessarily from explosives. Did you happen to see the Mythbusters episode in which they examined whether a fire extinguisher placed in a fire would explode and put out the fire? I'd characterize that as an explosion, if I heard it.
But intentional demolitions are characterized by the explosions being just before the collapse.
As to why you can't hear tonnes of steel hit. I don't know. You've got me. The recordings I heard did have sounds emanating from the collapse. Recording devices have a limited dynamic range, so I'm certain that the actual event was much louder and more detailed than what I heard.
Really, is your argument reduced to: "The recordings of the collapse didn't sound like what I thought they should, therefore we could have missed the explosions."? You should bear in mind that for the explosion to have caused the collapse, it would have to happen in the relative quiet
before the collapse begins.
And yet, I think you're on to something with the foamy thermite idea. The fuel
was sort of a foam. Like a foam, much of the fuel was some distance away from the columns. It was dispersed across all the floors in the form of wood, and carpet, and paper, and laminated desktops, and epoxy circuit boards, and plastic bezels and upholstery materials. It was non-uniform, and so it was extremely difficult to light. But with ten thousand gallons of kerosene as an igniter, it lit anyway.
