Pilots For 9/11 Truth Present Their Math

[chillzero]

Now look what you've done, JREF. This is supposed to be the one day of the year in which people forget about all their worries and get together with their families and just enjoy themselves, and you've got these poor guys doing math. Shame on you.

You've all ruined CIT's Christmas. I hope you're happy.

Well.... if they wanted they could wait til after Boxing Day, since it's unlikely any of us will be here to comment for around 48hrs from xmas day (or did you forget the downtime notice?).

 

[dtugg]

I hope that I've helped ruin Ranquisamo's Xmas. It's little presentation is guaranteed to be crap and a good laugh for us.

 

[double_o]

Aerodynamically Possible - Witness Compatible

Is that means they are going to show AA77 crashing into the Pentagon?
Because that's is the only witness compatible path I can think of.

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Well.... if they wanted they could wait til after Boxing Day, since it's unlikely any of us will be here to comment for around 48hrs from xmas day (or did you forget the downtime notice?).

Ah-HA! They've timed their release to coincide with our downtime. They will then tout the lack of response on JREF for 48 hours as unequivocal proof of its accuracy, as we will be rendered speechless for two solid days at its brilliance.

 

[chillzero]

Ah-HA! They've timed their release to coincide with our downtime. They will then tout the lack of response on JREF for 48 hours as unequivocal proof of its accuracy, as we will be rendered speechless for two solid days at its brilliance.

Of course

 

[dtugg]

Is that means they are going to show AA77 crashing into the Pentagon?
Because that's is the only witness compatible path I can think of.

You don't understand. There is evidence cooberated 13 times over proving that the plane flew NoC. Since the plane in question couldn't have caused the damage to the Pentagon and hit the light poles, that 100% proves a military deception. The only place it could have gone is over the Pentagon. The fact that the witnesses say it hit the Pentagon only proves that they were deceived by the greatest, most elaborate magic trick of all time. I mean, this is the NWO that we are talking about, of course they can do whatever they want to, even fool eyewitnesses into believing a large plane hit the largest office building in the world when it really flew over it.

 

[double_o]

You don't understand. There is evidence cooberated 13 times over proving that the plane flew NoC. Since the plane in question couldn't have caused the damage to the Pentagon and hit the light poles, that 100% proves a military deception. The only place it could have gone is over the Pentagon. The fact that the witnesses say it hit the Pentagon only proves that they were deceived by the greatest, most elaborate magic trick of all time. I mean, this is the NWO that we are talking about, of course they can do whatever they want to, even fool eyewitnesses into believing a large plane hit the largest office building in the world when it really flew over it.

Oh, now I get it. So the fact that they all saw the plane hit the pentagon is a proof that it didn't hit it. That makes prefect sense.

 

[dtugg]

Oh, now I get it. So the fact that they all saw the plane hit the pentagon is a proof that it didn't hit it. That makes prefect sense.

Wrong! The proof is that the 13 cooberated witnesses have it flying NoC. The fact that they say it hit the Pentagon only proves that the military deception which was the greatest magic trick of all time worked. Too bad for the NWO that there are really smart, competent, honest investigators that can figure this all out.

 

[The Big Dog]

Well, here is the absolutely documented and fully corroborated forensic flight path as described by Craig and Aldo and their witnesses:

Over the Navy annex, banked North of Citgo, descended below the tree line, pulled out of the bank, pulled out of the descent and then pulled up into an ascent right before the wall and over the impact site at the Pentagon, and then flew into the south parking lot after the explosion.

Do the math for that Flight path, Cap'n Bob.

 

[Bobert]

Now look what you've done, JREF. This is supposed to be the one day of the year in which people forget about all their worries and get together with their families and just enjoy themselves, and you've got these poor guys doing math. Shame on you.

You've all ruined CIT's Christmas. I hope you're happy.

Christmas was originally planned by the NWO as a diversion because they knew that ONE DAY the CIT WOULD BRING THEM DOWN!

 

[Bobert]

DAMMIT!
Just when I change my subtitle to Government Loyalist^TM Craig goes and changes us to "War Crime Apologists^TM"

 

[The Big Dog]

DAMMIT!
Just when I change my subtitle to Government Loyalist^TM Craig goes and changes us to "War Crime Apologists^TM"

My Lord, Craig is so freaking manic he cannot even put together a coherent sentence anymore.

However, he has established that "the math" will be presented in the form so familiar to mathematicians over the years:

A YouTube video.

Face palm.

 

[A W Smith]

My Lord, Craig is so freaking manic he cannot even put together a coherent sentence anymore.

However, he has established that "the math" will be presented in the form so familiar to mathematicians over the years:

A YouTube video.

Face palm.

 

[nicepants]

Aerodynamically Possible

If they are already saying that it's "aerodynamically possible" then either:

1 - They have already done the calculations confirming this and apparently aren't very interested in getting the word out quickly. (Perhaps they need the time to make DVDs, T-shirts, etc)

2 - They havent done the calculations, but they have already concluded that it is aerodynamically possible, therefore have to structure their calculations to reflect such.

Over the Navy annex, banked North of Citgo, descended below the tree line, pulled out of the bank, pulled out of the descent and then pulled up into an ascent right before the wall and over the impact site at the Pentagon, and then flew into the south parking lot after the explosion.

Something tells me that the math to be presented won't include all of the above aspects.....either that or it ignores the physical and aerodynamic limitations of a Boeing 757.

 

[jhunter1163]

Can you affirm the consequent with math?

 

[DGM]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_ENbUHAXYM&e

It's a trailer from PfT.
It says "The math is coming Christmas Day 2008"

I was waiting for the 'download now for $9.95'.

Hey guy's let's wait until Christmas to blow the lid off the largest cover-up in history.

"Truthers" should find it insulting that PFT thinks that they're stupid enough to fall for this round of BS.

 

[X]

Can you affirm the consequent with math?

They did last time.

Until it was pointed out that 30-some-odd G's was preposterous. And 11-something wasn't any better.

Mind you, they ignored (until, it seems, recently) those trivial details.

 

[TjW]

Well, you can present correct math on Youtube.

 

[Arus808]

well its xmas. its 4 pm pst and i see nothing from the Guide who lie any math or youtube video.

guess this will go up there with the Cretinous Investigoogle Team's smoking gun video (the one that was promised 2 years ago).

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

Reheat, Beachnut, Mackey: The Three Stooges

Here's the link to the presentation that exposes your pseudoskeptism.

Of course, Reheat's idiocy is so clearly bs that it can be refuted without any math at all (see Regarding "Debunking the North of Citgo Theory").

I eagerly await your cognitive dissonance and illogical responses.