• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark Roberts Interview on Skeptic Zone

mchapman said:
Typical of Mark Roberts. Cant handle the truth so puts someone on ignore.
Click to expand...

Wear it as a badge of honor. It means you have resisted childish insults, asked important questions, and recognized the deep flaws in his beliefs.
 
R.Mackey said:
I've been asking that question for years. I never got a satisfactory answer, when I asked directly.

When I asked obliquely, in the form of a survey, the answers were Dr. Steven Jones and Richard Gage.

Our newcomer appears to disagree with that sentiment, but the numbers are simply against him. Since he appears unwilling to answer this question -- or, indeed, virtually any question put to him so far, which is typical for the Truth Movement -- my previous result stands...
Click to expand...

How can there be leaders of a movement that does not exist?
 
RedIbis said:
Wear it as a badge of honor. It means you have resisted childish insults, asked important questions, and recognized the deep flaws in his beliefs.
Click to expand...

WOW..an endorsement from RedIbis. How so very...ummm...fortunate for you. He lends so much *cough* credibility to the truthers out there. Consider yourself very fortunate. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
How can there be leaders of a movement that does not exist?
Click to expand...
That is precisely the point. Just like wild horses couldn't drag a hypothesis from you lot, you won't tell us who you believe in, either. No approach works, be it polite questioning, leading, or statistical methods such as my survey.

This isn't the kind of thing you should be proud of.
 
mchapman said:
I havent put forward a conspiracy theory to back up. I have only asked for evidence backing up the religion of the official story.

You got that positive ID of the hijackers yet?
Click to expand...


Yes yes, we are very familiar with the cop outs. So long as you don't actually support your beliefs, then you don't have to worry about anyone holding you to the same criticism as you hold others. The evidence of the hijackers identities which is overwhelming has stood up in the court of law. Now if you want to imply that the hijackers were not on the plane, you then have to present a more plausible hypothesis. If you cannot present a more plausible hypothesis then you are a crackpot. Can you do this?

So yes, we have had positive ID of the hijackers for a long time and the case is closed (though not all the cases). Can you present a different hypothesis instead of trying to take pot shots at real research?
 
RedIbis said:
Wear it as a badge of honor. It means you have resisted childish insults, asked important questions, and recognized the deep flaws in his beliefs.
Click to expand...

It's nice to join such a select group.

We range from basic trolls to scientists like Frank Greening.

What's really amusing is that Roberts swore he was done with this altogether, but he started posting again just to get more members into his ignore club.
 
mchapman said:
We dont need to look far for the leader of the debunking movement. He is on this very thread, ignoring facts and oozing righteous indignation, with all his followers dutifully defending him.
Click to expand...

What facts is he ignoring no claimer?

And did you just include Frank Greening as part of your group? Does he know this?
 
R.Mackey said:
That is precisely the point. Just like wild horses couldn't drag a hypothesis from you lot, you won't tell us who you believe in, either. No approach works, be it polite questioning, leading, or statistical methods such as my survey.

This isn't the kind of thing you should be proud of.
Click to expand...

So now we have to believe in somebody? You're really putting the woo in twoof.
 
mchapman said:
Yes, Fetzer is a very influential truth movement leader.....thats why he is banned from 911blogger, his theories are banned from discussion at loose change and Mark Dice interviewed him with sounds of space beams in the background.
Click to expand...


That says more about the factionalism that has split the Truther movement into a thousand shreds then anything else.
And Alec Jones is Just as Batcrap Crazy as Fetzer, and Jones is pretty much the nearest the Twoofers have to a de facto leader.
 
mchapman said:
It's nice to join such a select group.

We range from basic trolls to scientists like Frank Greening.

What's really amusing is that Roberts swore he was done with this altogether, but he started posting again just to get more members into his ignore club.
Click to expand...

I'm reminded of Dwight Schrute with his shun on/shun off routine.
 
tomwaits said:
Also, I don't believe there was ever any actual proof that the Reichstag fire was false flag, other than some hearsay about Goering.
Click to expand...

The Reichstag fire is still the subject of debate among historians, although the trend is toward the opinion that the Nazis, although it came as a godsend to them, did not start the fire.
 
mchapman said:
It's nice to join such a select group.

We range from basic trolls to scientists like Frank Greening.

What's really amusing is that Roberts swore he was done with this altogether, but he started posting again just to get more members into his ignore club.
Click to expand...

Please understand...Frank Greening does NOT subscribe to the shallow fallacies of the those who believe 9/11 was an inside job. If you think he does...you must prove that.

As for Mark...he really threw a wrench into your charade...didn't he. I like how you try to discredit him, by actually giving him the credibility you so hate to give. Nice one again.
 
mchapman said:
They are used to having a religious belief in the official story. Independent thinking confuses them.
Click to expand...

Since when did "independent thinking" become a euphemism for lack of consensus?

Or maybe the "independent" part of "independent thinking" means thinking independent of facts or evidence... which is a contradiction, and not the least bit confusing... it can be summed up in one word: irrationality.
 
mchapman said:
They are used to having a religious belief in the official story. Independent thinking confuses them.
Click to expand...

When you actually have an independent thought in your head...let us know. As for a religious belief among debunkers...the last time using science, facts and irrefuatable evidence was a religion was when?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom