• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark Roberts Interview on Skeptic Zone

We already did, in this thread. Specifically which parts of our analysis do you dispute? Cite the posts and statements, and clearly explain why you think they're wrong.

See how this works?

Further, see my comment above where very influential TM leader Fetzer praised Hufschmid's work. Hufschmid was featured in Penn & Teller's "Bull...." 9/11 episode. As I pointed out in this thread, the Loose Change leaders did an interview with Hufschmid, praised his work, and asked for his support.


Yes, Fetzer is a very influential truth movement leader.....thats why he is banned from 911blogger, his theories are banned from discussion at loose change and Mark Dice interviewed him with sounds of space beams in the background.
 
I'd like to remind people not to spend time on, or give unnecessary attention to, people who have demonstrated that they aren't amenable to reason and who can do nothing more than whine and move goalposts.

If constructive discussion is possible, proceed. If not, the ignore feature is your friend.
 
Last edited:
Have you actually been reading this thread?

Yes, clearly you have not since you dodged my posts several times in a row and have lost your own argument in the process. You have not only changed what Gravy said, but you've been arguing against a strawman as well.
 
I havent put forward a conspiracy theory to back up. I have only asked for evidence backing up the religion of the official story.

Too bad for you that there's no "official story", McChaps. You're going to have to deal with the evidence as much as you need to avoid it.
 
Have you actually been reading this thread?
Typical of Mark Roberts. Cant handle the truth so puts someone on ignore.

mchapman - I have continually bumped post 244, and you have continued to ignore it. I have to assume at this point that your inability to answer the question- and indeed your outright refusal to even acknowledge it- means that you are incapable of admitting that your rebuttal in regards to the anti-Semitism within the conspiracist movement is unparalleled. That kind of cognitive dissonance is reserved for folks who simply cannot reconcile their fantasy with the facts.

You also called me a proven liar, but were unable to substantiate that accusation as well- yet you demand to be taken seriously. You're a fraud, and you don't deserve any more attention.

Hah. :wow2:
 
Last edited:
Typical of Mark Roberts. Cant handle the truth so puts someone on ignore.

Typical of truthers. Can't handle the truth so keeps on spewing cherberish, making zero sense, and claims nothing of a position...but loves to ask ridiculous questions. Well played McChapman. We've seen your kind here before...and we find you amusing.
 
Typical of Mark Roberts. Cant handle the truth so puts someone on ignore.

Do you know your movement, your ideas are made up free of evidence. Your undefined ideas to the space beam. You are all the same, anti-intellectual false statement experts who use your own opinions as facts and evidence. Your ideas are the same as Fetzer's.

You have nothing to ignore.
 
Typical of truthers. Can't handle the truth so keeps on spewing cherberish, making zero sense, and claims nothing of a position...but loves to ask ridiculous questions. Well played McChapman. We've seen your kind here before...and we find you amusing.

Indeed, we have seen his kind before. It's an epidemic.
 
[truther mode/on] Who said there was a truth movement? Did I say that? Can you please point to the post where I claimed there was a truth movement? If you can't, you'll need to retract that statement. [truther mode/off]
 
Typical of Mark Roberts. Cant handle the truth so puts someone on ignore.

Y'know... purely as a question of psychology... I would love to know how close you come to actually believing that.

Come to think of it, I would also love to know how close you come to thinking that anyone else at all will believe it.
 
So who exactly ARE the leaders of the 'truth' movement then?

We dont need to look far for the leader of the debunking movement. He is on this very thread, ignoring facts and oozing righteous indignation, with all his followers dutifully defending him.
 
Y'know... purely as a question of psychology... I would love to know how close you come to actually believing that.

Come to think of it, I would also love to know how close you come to thinking that anyone else at all will believe it.

It's a fact not a question of belief.
 
So who exactly ARE the leaders of the 'truth' movement then?

I've been asking that question for years. I never got a satisfactory answer, when I asked directly.

When I asked obliquely, in the form of a survey, the answers were Dr. Steven Jones and Richard Gage.

Our newcomer appears to disagree with that sentiment, but the numbers are simply against him. Since he appears unwilling to answer this question -- or, indeed, virtually any question put to him so far, which is typical for the Truth Movement -- my previous result stands...
 
We dont need to look far for the leader of the debunking movement. He is on this very thread, ignoring facts and oozing righteous indignation, with all his followers dutifully defending him.

Careful... trolling is not taken lightly here.
 
We dont need to look far for the leader of the debunking movement. He is on this very thread, ignoring facts and oozing righteous indignation, with all his followers dutifully defending him.

Nice dodge, yet again. Since you've presented zero facts...there's nothing to ignore. Since Mark has does nothing but provide correct information and point you to useful resources...one can conclude that you seek anything but truth and offering nothing but empty rhetoric. Nothing to see here folks...it's just another useless troll poster...and this time he goes by the name McChapman.
 
It's a fact not a question of belief.

We don't take anything you conclude as fact...since you've provided no substance or relevant information. You rank right up there with CIT as far as credible or worthy of attention. It's ok lil' buddy...keep going on about nothing and thinking you have some sort of credence. Silly little guy.
 
We don't take anything you conclude as fact...since you've provided no substance or relevant information. You rank right up there with CIT as far as credible or worthy of attention. It's ok lil' buddy...keep going on about nothing and thinking you have some sort of credence. Silly little guy.

Your insults are amusing but do you have any evidence?
 

Back
Top Bottom