The north side evidence validated to the point of redundancy

[TC329]

U R debunked. [Edited for civility].

Great. More high school mentality from truthers. Whood-a-thunk?

"TAM' POST #3 : CIT, PFT, are jokes...

"QUAD4_72" POST #5 : Can anyone explain what this crazed lunatic is talking about?

"DRUDGEWIRE" POST#6 : There's also option three, which is to point and laugh at you. I like option three.

"JIMBENARM" POST#22 : CIT = Citizen's Investigative Team. Kinda like a retarded Scooby-Do and gang. PFT = Pilots For Truth. Kinda like a retarded CIT.

RON WEICK POST#40 : your tiny group of low-IQ liars

RON WEICK POST#44 : I ask the liars this question repeatedly

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Oh! It looks like yet another subintellectual truther bites the dust. Mods?

Some people don't have the self esteem to withstand being OMGWTFPWNED!!!!!111ONE1ROFLMAO so they have to resort to name-calling.

 

[TC329]

Oh! It looks like yet another subintellectual truther bites the dust. Mods?

ooooooooohhhhhhhhhh cross your fingers.

 

[TC329]

What was in that video that you wanted me to see?

Father McGraw confirms that the plane hit the lamp post.

obviously and not suprisingly you didn't watch the video because Father McGraw admits to not having actually seen that happen only deducing by seeing the downed poles after the fact.......

how typical of you "researchers"......thats why i call you guys duh-bunkers.

 

[Drudgewire]

"DRUDGEWIRE" POST#6 : There's also option three, which is to point and laugh at you. I like option three.

Hey, he's the one who said there were only two choices. I was simply pointing out the error and backing it up with anecdotal evidence. v

v

 

[Mince]

"TAM' POST #3 : CIT, PFT, are jokes...

"QUAD4_72" POST #5 : Can anyone explain what this crazed lunatic is talking about?

"DRUDGEWIRE" POST#6 : There's also option three, which is to point and laugh at you. I like option three.

"JIMBENARM" POST#22 : CIT = Citizen's Investigative Team. Kinda like a retarded Scooby-Do and gang. PFT = Pilots For Truth. Kinda like a retarded CIT.

RON WEICK POST#40 : your tiny group of low-IQ liars

RON WEICK POST#44 : I ask the liars this question repeatedly

Dude, bad behavior does not allow or excuse other bad behavior. I thought that would be obvious to an intellectual such as yourself. And I don't cross my fingers, but I will hope very hard.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

obviously and not suprisingly you didn't watch the video because Father McGraw admits to not having actually seen that happen only deducing by seeing the downed poles after the fact.......

how typical of you "researchers"......thats why i call you guys duh-bunkers.

So TC. What did hit the light poles if not a plane? Or where they planted in real-time in front of hundreds of people on the road?

 

[beachnut]

"TAM' POST #3 : CIT, PFT, are jokes...

"QUAD4_72" POST #5 : Can anyone explain what this crazed lunatic is talking about?

"DRUDGEWIRE" POST#6 : There's also option three, which is to point and laugh at you. I like option three.

"JIMBENARM" POST#22 : CIT = Citizen's Investigative Team. Kinda like a retarded Scooby-Do and gang. PFT = Pilots For Truth. Kinda like a retarded CIT.

RON WEICK POST#40 : your tiny group of low-IQ liars

RON WEICK POST#44 : I ask the liars this question repeatedly

You are a liar if you say 77 did not hit the Pentagon. Simple stuff.

Did you say 77 did not hit the Pentagon?
Did you say 77 did not knock down the lampposts?
Did you say 77 flew north of the CITGO?

If you answered yes to any of these statements you are a liar. There is enough proof to show you are wrong, but you fail to use it. If you would not lie about these things, then you are not a liar.

Don't get upset, even my brother lies. You are in great company, like with Bush, your favorite, you make up bigger lies! Good job, you can be president, just like Bush, but ...

What is worse you make up the fake evidence to support your lies, that is pathetic.

Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, you are making up lies. With false ideas you make up about 77, you sell DVDs. Stop getting upset and go sell your lies, you know they are lies. If you don’t know you are making up lies, you have a problem.

 

[WildCat]

proof?

Overwhelming eyewitness and physical evidence.

 

[The Big Dog]

obviously and not suprisingly you didn't watch the video because Father McGraw admits to not having actually seen that happen only deducing by seeing the downed poles after the fact.......

how typical of you "researchers"......thats why i call you guys duh-bunkers.

Plane flies over his car, light poles crash to the ground, plane crashed into the Pentagon. Yeah, he only "deduced" that the plane hit the pole.

Wow, ya got him!

And he said he didn't realize he was next to the Pentagon when the plane hit the Pentagon!

That is crack debunking!

By the way, Dom, still waiting for your explanation why Pickering thinks you and your pals are a bunch of frauds.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

All the knocked over lamp posts were on the south side of the citgo.

Physical evidence > eyewitnesses.

U R bedunked.

[CIT]Not if that evidence was planted! And it was! Because we said so![/CIT]

I absolutely love how they feel their stupendously complicated fantasy is somehow more plausible than upwards of 13 people being simply mistaken about something.

 

[Athyrio]

you haven't explained what knocked those light poles down because not a single eyewitness saw it happen.

U R debunked. [Edited for civility]

Did you find any eyewitnesses who observed NWO operatives dismantling those lightpoles and strategically placing them as they were found, or see the guy who lopped off the treetop?

Do you ever follow the stream of your illogical scenarios?

Is this way too big for your little mind?

 

[WildCat]

I absolutely love how they feel their stupendously complicated fantasy is somehow more plausible than upwards of 13 people being simply mistaken about something.

And all 13 say Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

 

[Confuseling]

[CIT]Not if that evidence was planted! And it was! Because we said so![/CIT]

I absolutely love how they feel their stupendously complicated fantasy is somehow more plausible than upwards of 13 people being simply mistaken about something.

I'm sticking with coached and misrepresented, until I'm given the unexpurgated original interviews.

[Psssst. CIT. THAT'S YOUR CUE...]

 

[WildCat]

And I'll also point out that the engine sucking in the top of that tree explains the smoke trail in the video.

 

[bje]

TLB changes his story.

There has to be a point where logical rational individuals choose to accept evidence rather than deny it.

You already agreed with me that CIT denies the evidence

How much validation will it take before you accept this evidence?

As you yourself agreed, it would take an investigation of ALL of the evidence and all of the key eyewitnesses.

The north side evidence is not a theory. It is what all the witnesses unanimously report.

You already agreed with me that the so-called "North Side witnesses" were not all the witnesses.

Tell us all here why you changed your mind, TLB? Did CIT have to pay you a lot of money to change your story? How is it that over 1,000 witnesses magically turned into 13 witnesses?

Remember, TLB, you're on record in this forum.

 

[Drudgewire]

Do you ever follow the stream of your illogical scenarios?

Regardless of which theory they support, which questions they think are the most valid, which clique they fall into, there are two words they all have to work into the equation somehow:

Popular Mechanics

If PM isn't "in on it," there's not a single 9/11 CT which can begin to make sense, because they couldn't possibly be SO thorough and just be mistaken. They either truly confirm the mythical "official version," or they systematically engaged in the cover-up with smoke and mirrors in an attempt to stifle the "truth."

Popular Mechanics is, for the most part, a car magazine. A magazine which has been around since 1902. Their explanation is "people were asking questions, we wanted to find the answers. We're into that sort of thing."

For PM to be on it, there are only two possible scenarios:

1. The NWO had been running a magazine for 99 years preparing to use it as a tool for when their grand plan would finally come to fruition... the whole time masquerading as an innocuous dentist's office mag talking about crank shafts.

2. The NWO took over an entire writing staff, or spent years filtering them into their positions, and replaced the original science geeks with their own disinfo scientists without anyone ever complaining or noticing for that matter. And finally, presenting this fraud to a public (including some smart guys) who just weren't smart enough to see through the lies theologians and paranoids do.


Now, what was that about being illogical?

 

[DGM]

Did you find any eyewitnesses who observed NWO operatives dismantling those lightpoles and strategically placing them as they were found, or see the guy who lopped off the treetop?

Do you ever follow the stream of your illogical scenarios?

Is this way too big for your little mind?

Didn't you know, the NWO has a time machine? That's the only way I can figure they could have done the hours of work it would have taken to set up the scene as perfect as it was.

Hey, tell me this idea isn't anymore moronic than everything the "truthers" have come up with.

 

[John Blonn]

I prefer the west side of the CITGO theory myself.

Oh, and ask me about the flyunder! Flyunder makes more sense because it explains why no one saw a plane fly away.

 

[DGM]

I prefer the west side of the CITGO theory myself.

Oh, and ask me about the flyunder! Flyunder makes more sense because it explains why no one saw a plane fly away.

Retractable lawn. Now your thinking outside the box. Just add the time machine and we got ourselves a real solution.