TheLoneBedouin
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 733
There has to be a point where logical rational individuals choose to accept evidence rather than deny it.
How much validation will it take before you accept this evidence?
The north side evidence is not a theory. It is what all the witnesses unanimously report.
The number of north side witness accounts has now increased to 13 and the critical independently confirmed flyover witness account of Roosevelt Roberts Jr. has now been released.
View evidence here.
The initial reaction and seemingly unanimous consensus regarding the citgo witnesses presented in The PentaCon from the "skeptic" community here at jref has been that they were all innocently mistaken in the exact same way.
Does it really make sense to suggest that such a drastic mistake could be repeated over and over?
If the citgo witnesses were a strange coincidental fluke can you honestly continue to tell yourself that this fluke has been repeated 9 more times from different perspectives while not a single independently confirmed south side account exists?
Reheat tried to suggest that the "NoC flight path is impossible" but in order to do so he had to rely on the notion that there was no visble bank or wing tilt reported from the witnesses.
This is no longer the case as the north side bank has not only been documented and corroborated by the ANC workers but also by heliport air traffic controller Sean Boger.
Of course the citgo witnesses did not see the plane on the approach like the Arlington Cemetery workers did from the area right in front of the maintenance buildings which is why one set of witnesses saw the bank while the others did not.
Furthermore the approach speed has now been established as significantly slower than reported by the NTSB or estimated from previous accounts.
William Middleton and Sean Boger are very valuable corroborating witnesses to this slower speed.
Naturally this and the now definitive bank changes the entire dynamic of Reheat’s paper rendering it irrelevant to the evidence presented.
In light of this new evidence the true critical thinkers in this forum will be left with a choice. You can join Caustic Logic as the sole individual willing to accuse the witnesses of being operatives sent out to deliberately lie while taking part in a vast disinfo conspiracy to incorrectly demonstrate the official story false……or you can accept the undeniable implications of this clearly fatal contradiction to the official 9/11 narrative and join the true skeptics, CIT, in their quest to uncover this military deception and expose the fraudulent permanent global war on terror.
How much validation will it take before you accept this evidence?
The north side evidence is not a theory. It is what all the witnesses unanimously report.
The number of north side witness accounts has now increased to 13 and the critical independently confirmed flyover witness account of Roosevelt Roberts Jr. has now been released.
View evidence here.
The initial reaction and seemingly unanimous consensus regarding the citgo witnesses presented in The PentaCon from the "skeptic" community here at jref has been that they were all innocently mistaken in the exact same way.
Does it really make sense to suggest that such a drastic mistake could be repeated over and over?
If the citgo witnesses were a strange coincidental fluke can you honestly continue to tell yourself that this fluke has been repeated 9 more times from different perspectives while not a single independently confirmed south side account exists?
Reheat tried to suggest that the "NoC flight path is impossible" but in order to do so he had to rely on the notion that there was no visble bank or wing tilt reported from the witnesses.
This is no longer the case as the north side bank has not only been documented and corroborated by the ANC workers but also by heliport air traffic controller Sean Boger.
Of course the citgo witnesses did not see the plane on the approach like the Arlington Cemetery workers did from the area right in front of the maintenance buildings which is why one set of witnesses saw the bank while the others did not.
Furthermore the approach speed has now been established as significantly slower than reported by the NTSB or estimated from previous accounts.
William Middleton and Sean Boger are very valuable corroborating witnesses to this slower speed.
Naturally this and the now definitive bank changes the entire dynamic of Reheat’s paper rendering it irrelevant to the evidence presented.
In light of this new evidence the true critical thinkers in this forum will be left with a choice. You can join Caustic Logic as the sole individual willing to accuse the witnesses of being operatives sent out to deliberately lie while taking part in a vast disinfo conspiracy to incorrectly demonstrate the official story false……or you can accept the undeniable implications of this clearly fatal contradiction to the official 9/11 narrative and join the true skeptics, CIT, in their quest to uncover this military deception and expose the fraudulent permanent global war on terror.
